Skip to main content
Log in

A Break Away from the (Hetero)norm?: Lawrence v Gallagher [2012] 1 FCR 557; [2012] EWCA Civ 394

  • Case Notes
  • Published:
Feminist Legal Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Lawrence v Gallagher, the issue as to what constitutes an equitable division of assets in the event of civil partnership dissolution arose for the first time. It had been hoped that the case would mark a break away from the heavy reliance upon heteronormativity that had been characteristic of the previous ancillary relief case law. However, it is argued here that what we see within the judgment is the Court of Appeal presenting the problem (and, so, the parties) in Lawrence so as to ‘fit’ within the pre-existing framework. Even at this early stage, it seems that legal actors are approaching civil partnerships on the basis of gendered assumptions and expectations. There is a need to raise awareness of this inability to get past ideas about heteronormativity, and to highlight their possible incompatibility with the lives of lesbian and gay couples, before their radical potential is lost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See White v White [2001] 1 AC 596.

  2. Ibid at 605, per Lord Nicholls.

  3. Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] 2 AC 618 at 632, per Lord Nicholls.

  4. Lawrence v Gallagher [2012] 1 FCR 557 at 566.

  5. Ibid at 564.

  6. Ibid at 567.

  7. B v B [2010] 2 FLR 1214.

  8. Radmacher v Granatino [2011] 1 AC 534.

  9. Lawrence v Gallagher [2012] 1 FCR 557 at 560 per Lord Justice Thorpe.

References

  • Adam, Conrad. 2008. Financial provision on dissolution. Family Law Journal 73(2): 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendell, Terry. 1995. Fathers and divorce. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auchmuty, Rosemary. 2013. With dissolution comes revelation: Civil partners discover the economic basis of marriage. Feminists@law 3/1. http://journals.kent.ac.uk/index.php/feministsatlaw/article/view/71/193. Accessed 14 September 2013.

  • Barker, Nicola. 2012. Not the marrying kind: A feminist critique of same sex marriage. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, Susan. 1999. Family law and sexuality: Feminist engagements. Social & Legal Studies 8(3): 369–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 1986. Sex and gender in Simone de Beauvoir’s Second sex. Yale French Studies 72: 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 1993. Critically queer. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 1(1): 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 1999. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, Christopher. 1999. No place like home: Relationships and family life among lesbians and gay men. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, Samuel. 2003. Telepistemology of the closet; Or, the queer politics of Six feet under. Journal of American Culture 26(1): 24–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Winnie. 2013. Cohabitation, civil partnership, marriage and the equal sharing principle. Legal Studies 33(1): 46–65.

  • Collier, Richard. 1995. Masculinity, law and the family. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, Gillian. 1997. Lesbian lifestyles: Women’s work and the politics of sexuality. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, Martha. 2008. The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 20(1): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, Rob. 2012. Lawrence v Gallagher [2012] EWCA Civ 394—Playing a straight bat in civil partnership appeals? Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law 34(3): 357–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring, Jonathan. 2012. Breaking bonds. New Law Journal 162: 703–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Paul. 2011. Challenging the heteronormativity of marriage: The role of judicial interpretation and authority. Social & Legal Studies 20(3): 349–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, Moya. 2007. Judith Butler: From norms to politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millward, David. 2013. Women delay careers to have children. The Telegraph, 28 July.

  • Peel, Elizabeth, and Rosie Harding. 2004. Divorcing romance, rights and radicalism: Beyond pro and anti in the lesbian and gay marriage debate. Feminism & Psychology 14(4): 588–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Rosie Harding and the anonymous reviewer for their comments on earlier drafts of this case note.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlotte Bendall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bendall, C. A Break Away from the (Hetero)norm?: Lawrence v Gallagher [2012] 1 FCR 557; [2012] EWCA Civ 394. Fem Leg Stud 21, 303–310 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-013-9247-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-013-9247-8

Keywords

Navigation