Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate sponsored image films

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The vast number of high quality corporate image and advocacy films, combined with the many other instruments of persuasion and control by corporations, powerfully direct the attitudes of the populace. In the absence of equal access, the best protection against deception from any powerful institution is skepticism — minds trained in critical thinking. But technically proficient, expensive films (costing from $50,00 to $600,000) encourage credulity instead of thought. The schools should train young people, therefore, how to resist corporate film propaganda by teaching them the kinds of questions to ask. An analysis of Chesebrough-Pond Corporation's Family offers an effective method through combining traditional rhetorical awareness of the speaker in a communication, knowledge of informal fallacies, the National Council of Teachers of English Committee on Public Doublespeak's ‘intensify/downplay’ approach, and Richard Ohmann's method in ‘Doublespeak and Ideology in Ads’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Additional information

James Richard Bennett is Professor of English at the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. He is the Editor of Style, a Journal of Stylistics. He won the Fulbright Teaching Award in Yugoslavia in 1968–69. His most important publication is: Prose Style: A Historical Approach Through Studies, 1971.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bennett, J.R. Corporate sponsored image films. J Bus Ethics 2, 35–41 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382711

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382711

Keywords

Navigation