Skip to main content
Log in

Embarrassment

  • Published:
The Journal of Value Inquiry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. I draw this example form Sabini and Silver, 5, p. 10. The following case – number 6 – which uses the same details yet alters them, is my own.

  2. Taylor, 6, p. 69; Deonna, Rodogno, and Teroni, 1, p. 115; Purshouse, 7, p. 520. See also Edelman, 2, p. 206, which is not a philosophical analysis but rather an article dealing with empirical psychology.

  3. Taylor, 6, p. 70; Sabini and Silver, 5, p. 14, note 13.

  4. Szabados, 8–90, p. 345.

  5. Taylor, 6, p. 74.

  6. Shame, unlike embarrassment, has gained extensive attention from philosophers aiming to analyze its nature. In fact, some of the portrayals of embarrassment which I discuss in this article are taken from books or articles that deal with shame, and refer to embarrassment mainly for purposes of comparison. As my aim is to offer an account of embarrassment, and not of shame, I will not deal with the latter. Suffice it to say that shame does not necessarily involve the notion of public interaction that I ascribe to embarrassment. One can be ashamed of her thoughts, views, impulses, etc., without interacting, or even imagining an interaction, with anybody else. Another difference between the two is that shame has to do with seeing ourselves in a negative light, while embarrassment, as case #7 manifests, can be connected to a positive appraisal. Also, even when embarrassment is connected to a negative feature of ours, it is often not a grave one. The negative features of ours that we are embarrassed about seem to be lesser in degree than the ones we are ashamed of. This last notion is one that I will attend to in my discussion.

  7. Sabini and Silver, 5, p. 11.

  8. Szabados, 8–90, p. 345.

  9. Sabini and Silver, 5, p. 11.

  10. Taylor, 6, p. 75.

  11. Goffman, 3, p. 268.

  12. Purshouse, 7, pp. 530–531.

  13. Ibid, p. 532.

  14. I am indebted to an anonymous referee for this remark.

  15. Ibid, p. 537.

  16. Julien A. Deonna, Raffaele Rodogno, and Fabrice Teroni, 1, p. 116.

  17. Sabini and Silver, 5, p. 11.

  18. Harré, 4, p. 197.

  19. C.f. Purshouse, 7, p. 528.

  20. Goffman, 3, p. 266.

  21. Purshouse, 7, p. 530.

  22. Ibid.

  23. Ibid, p. 531.

  24. Ibid, note 22.

References

  1. Deonna, Julien A., Raffaele Rodogno, and Fabrice Teroni. 2012. In Defense of Shame. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Edelmann, Robert J. 1990. Embarrassment and blushing: A component-process model, some initial descriptive and cross-cultural data. In Shyness and Embarrassment: Perspectives From Social Psychology, ed. W. Ray Crozier, 205–229. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Goffman, Erving. 1956. Embarrassment and social organization. American Journal of Sociology 62: 264–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Harré, Rom. 1990. Embarrassment: A conceptual analysis. In Shyness and Embarrassment: Perspectives From Social Psychology, ed. W. RayCrozier, 181–204. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Sabini, John, and Mauri Silver. 1997. In defense of shame: Shame in the context of guilt and embarrassment. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 27: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor, Gabriele. 1985. Pride, Shame, and Guilt: Emotions of Self-Assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Purshouse, Luke. 2001. Embarrassment: A philosophical analysis. Philosophy 76: 515–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Béla Szabados. 1989–1990. Embarrassment and self-esteem. Journal of Philosophical Research 15: 341–349.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yotam Benziman.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benziman, Y. Embarrassment. J Value Inquiry 54, 77–89 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-019-09685-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-019-09685-6

Navigation