Skip to main content
Log in

Learning to Be Job Ready: Strategies for Greater Social Inclusion in Public Sector Employment

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

‘Learning to be job ready’ (L2BJR) was a pilot scheme involving 16 long-term unemployed people from a range of backgrounds being offered a 6-month paid placement within the care department of a city council in Northern England. The project was based on a partnership with the largest college in the city specialising in post-16 education and training for residents and employees. The college targeted people as potential candidates for the programme through their prior attendance on or interest in care courses at the college, rather than the council employing more traditional methods of recruitment. Surveys, focus groups and interviews were utilised to capture the views and experiences of the participants, project workers and line managers, and also evidence of the project’s impact on service delivery in the care department. The article adds to our conceptual and practical knowledge of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the public sector in three distinct ways. From a social and business perspective, the findings of the research highlight a potentially more robust strategy for matching long-term unemployed citizens to training and job opportunities in the public sector than is otherwise possible through the more conventional route of the job centre. Secondly, through this approach and with appropriate pre-training, a greater understanding of and empathy for the service users can be developed in the new organisational members, strengthening the subsequent ethical delivery and quality of the service. Finally, a re-conceptualisation of Carroll’s influential model of CSR, which also specifically incorporates the ethical and social inclusion duties of public sector organisations not only as service providers but also as potential employers, offers a more tailored paradigm for understanding this unique yet under-researched element of CSR theory and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arvidsson, S. (2010). Communication of corporate social responsibility: A study of the views of management teams in large companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(3), 339–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty, E., Beatty, C., Foden, M., Lawless, P., Pearson, S., & Wilson, I. (2010). The new deal for communities experience: A final assessment. Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Report to the Department for Communities and Local Government.

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of social corporate responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34, 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1998). The four faces of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 100(101), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, J. (2008). Explaining local government: Local government in Britain since 1800. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, C. (1991). In the way of women: Men’s resistance to sex equality. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2004). Business ethics: A European perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, R., Batty, E., Cole, I., & Robinson, D. (2009). Work and worklessness in deprived neighbourhoods: Policy assumptions and personal experiences. London: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, L. (1999). Beyond the business case: A three-pronged approach to equality action. Human Resource Management Journal, 9(1), 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, L. (2006). Re-regulation for gender equality: From ‘either/or’ to ‘both’. Industrial Relations Journal, 37(4), 299–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, L. (2007). The road is long: Thirty years of equality legislation in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 45(3), 463–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T., & Bierema, L. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: Issues for human resource development professionals. International Journal of Training and Development, 12(1), 24–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government Equalities Office. (2010). Equality Act 2010. Accessed April 26, from www.equalities.gov.uk/equality_bill.aspx.

  • Grosser, K. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and gender equality: Women as stakeholders and the European Union sustainability strategy. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(3), 290–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosser, K., & Moon, J. (2005). Gender mainstreaming and corporate social responsibility: Reporting workplace issues. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(4), 327–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. (2010). Self-regulation, corporate social responsibility, and the business case: Do they work in achieving workplace equality and safety? Journal of Business Ethics, 92(4), 585–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, T. (2002). The non-profit sector, government and business: Partners in the dance of change—an Irish perspective. Public Management Review, 4(2), 257–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, J., & Norman, W. (2004). Stakeholder theory, corporate governance and public management: What can history of state-run enterprises teach us in the post-Enron era? Journal of Business Ethics, 53(3), 247–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebson, G., Grimshaw, D., & Marchington, M. (2003). PPPS and the changing public sector ethos: Case-study evidence from the health and local authority sectors. Work, Employment & Society, 17(3), 481–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandola, R., & Fullerton, J. (1998). Managing the mosaic: Diversity in action. London: Institute of Personnel Development Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, N. (2004). Template analysis. In C. M. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 118–134). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirton, G., & Greene, A. (2005). The dynamics of managing diversity: A critical approach. Oxford: Butterworth and Heinneman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauring, J., & Thomsen, C. (2009). Ideals and practices in CSR identity making: The case of equal opportunities. Employee Relations Journal, 31(1), 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledwith, S., & Colgan, F. (1996). Women in organisations. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, A., Moon, J., & Visser, W. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in management research: Focus, nature, salience and sources of influence. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markel, K., & Barclay, L. (2009). Addressing the underemployment of persons with disabilities: Recommendations for expanding organizational social responsibility. Employment Responsibility and Rights Journal, 21(4), 305–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, G., Blair, S., & McDougall, M. (2001). Edging towards managing diversity in practice. Employee Relations, 23(5), 468–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, P. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehan, J., Meehan, K., & Richards, A. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: The 3C-SR model. International Journal of Social Economics, 33(5), 386–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otley, D., & Berry, A. (1994). Case study research in management accounting and control. Management Accounting Research, 5, 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, P., Mills, A., Elmes, M., & Prasad, A. (1997). Managing the organizational melting pot: Dilemmas of workplace diversity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randle, H., & Haunch, P. (2008). Corporate social responsibility—good for employers, good for trade unions? International labour process conference, Dublin, March 2008.

  • Ridley-Duff, R., & Bull, M. (2011). Understanding social enterprise: Theory and practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M., & Carroll, A. B. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: A three-domain approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 503–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullberg, J. (2004). Illusions of corporate power: Revisiting the relative powers of corporations and governments. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(4), 325–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1993). Applications of case study research. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. J. W. Bennett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bennett, A.J.W. Learning to Be Job Ready: Strategies for Greater Social Inclusion in Public Sector Employment. J Bus Ethics 104, 347–359 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0913-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0913-y

Keywords

Navigation