Skip to main content
Log in

Belief, Apparitions, and Rationality: The Social Scientific Study of Religion after Wittgenstein1

  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal I pursue is to redefine the study of religious epistemology on the basis of an ethnomethodological extension of Wittgenstein. This approach shows that the nature of religious belief and its relation to facts, proofs, and empirical reality are matters that are dealt with by ordinary members of society. The examination of this lay epistemology reveals that – far from being a settled and established entity – religious belief is a polymorphous phenomenon. Religious belief is a pragmatic resource whose configuration is shaped to allow the accomplishment of interactional moves within specific contexts. I defend this thesis by analyzing accounts pertaining to a contemporary religious apparition claim.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beattie, J. (1964). Other Cultures. London: Cohen and West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, T.E. (1978). Wittgenstein’s Lectures on Religious Belief: A Re-Consideration. In E. Beinfillner et al. (Ed.), Wittgenstein and His Impact on Contemporary Thought. Vienna: Holder-Pichler-Tempsky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cioffi, F. (1981). Wittgenstein and the Fire-Festivals. In I. Block (Ed.), Perspectives on Wittgenstein. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couglhan, M.J. (1986). Wittgensteinian Philosophy and Religious Belief. Metaphilosophy 17: 230–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, J. (1979). The Social Construction of Mind. Totowa: Rowan and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, J. (1989). Mind in Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1965). The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. Transl. J.W. Swain. New York: The Free Press.

  • Eliade, M. (1976). Patterns of Comparative Religion. London: Sheed and Ward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazer, J. (1958). The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M. and Livingston, E. (1981). The Work of a Discovering Science Construed with Materials from the Optically Discovered Pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11: 131–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geivett, D. and Sweetman, B. (1992). Introduction. In D. Geivett and B. Sweetman (Eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on Religious Epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, M. and Lukes, S. (Eds.) (1982). Rationality and Relativism. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, R. (1970). African Traditional Thought and Western Science. In B. Wilson. (Ed.), Rationality. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, F. (1986). Theology After Wittgenstein. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klass, M. (1995). Ordered Universes; Approaches to the Anthropology of Religion. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, E. (1986). The Ethnomethodological Foundations of Mathematics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (1982). Relativism in its Place. In M. Hollis and S. Lukes (Eds.), Rationality and Relativism. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1985). Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, N. (1975). The Groundlessness of Belief. In S.C. Brown (Ed.), Reason and Religion. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. (1954). Magic, Science and Religion and Other Essays. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. (1984). On Certainty and Religious Belief. Religious Studies 20: 593–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, F.M. (1978/1873). Introduction to the Science of Religion. New York: Arno Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, R. (1972). Belief, Language, and Experience. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D.Z. (2003). Wittgenstein, Wittgensteinianism, and Magic: A philosophical tragedy? Religious Studies 39: 185–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, D. (2001). Missing the Entire Point: Wittgenstein and Religion. Religious Studies 37: 161–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satris, S.A. (1978). Wittgenstein and the Philosophy of Religion. In E. Leinfillner et al. (Ed.), Wittgenstein and His Impact on Contemporary Thought. Vienna: Holder-Pichler-Tempsky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharrock, W.W. and Anderson R.J. (1985). Magic, Witchcraft and the Materialist Mentality. Human Studies 8: 357–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, H. (1877). The Principles of Sociology. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanesby, D. (1985). Science, Reason and Religion. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tambiah, S.J. (1990). Magic, Science and Religion, and the Scope of Rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooker, D.E. (1992). Identity Systems of Highland Burma: ‘Belief,’ Akha Zan, and a Critique of Interiorized Notions of Ethno-Religious Identity. Man 27: 799–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, E.B. (1891). Primitive Culture. London: Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, P. (1970). Understanding a Primitive Society. In B.R. Wilson (Ed.), Rationality. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B.R. (Ed.) (1970). Rationality. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1966). Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief, C. Barrette (Ed.), Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1972). On Certainty. G.E.M. Anscombe and G.H. von Wright (Ed.), Harper Torchbook: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1979). Remarks on Frazer’s golden bough. In C.G. Luckhardt (Ed.), Wittgenstein: Sources and Perspectives. Sussex: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Culture and Value. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward Berryman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berryman, E. Belief, Apparitions, and Rationality: The Social Scientific Study of Religion after Wittgenstein1 . Hum Stud 28, 15–39 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-005-3595-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-005-3595-6

Keywords

Navigation