Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bell's theorem and the nature of reality

  • Part I. Invited Papers Dedicated To John Stewart Bell
  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We rediscuss the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in Bohm's spin version and oppose to it Bohr's controversial point of view. Then we explain Bell's theorem, Bell inequalities, and its consequences. We describe the experiment of Aspect, Dalibard, and Roger in detail. Finally we draw attention to the nonlocal structure of the underlying theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. S. Bell, “Bertlmann's socks and the nature of reality,”J. Phys. 42, Colloque C-2, suppl. au No. 3, March 1981; see also J. S. Bell, Ref. 44, p. 139.

  2. D. M. Greenberger, ed., “New Techniques and Ideas in Quantum Measurement Theory,”Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 480, 1 (1986);

  3. A. van der Merwe, F. Selleri, and G. Tarozzi, eds.,Microphysical Reality and Quantum Formalism (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1988);

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, eds.,Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1985);

    Google Scholar 

  5. Laura M. Roth and Ahira Inomata, eds.,Fundamental Questions in Quantum Mechanics (Gordon & Breach, New York, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. A. Schilpp, Hrsg.,Albert Einstein als Philosoph und Naturforscher (Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1983); English edition: P. A. Schilpp, ed.,Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist (Open Court, La Salle, Illinois, 1949).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen,Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. N. Bohr,Phys. Rev. 48, 696 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Bohm,Quantum Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Einstein-Max Born Briefwechsel 1916–1955, (rororo Rowohlt, Reinbeck, Hamburg, 1972); English edition:The Born-Einstein Letters (Macmillan, London, 1971).

  11. A. Petersen,Bull. At. Sci.,XIX (7), 8 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Stöckler, “EPR, relativity and realism,” in Ref. 12, p. 301;

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Stöckler, “Philosophen in der Mikrowelt—ratlos?”Z. allgem. Wissenschaftstheorie XVII (1), 68 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. R. Popper, “Realism and a proposal for a simplified new variant of the EPR experiment,” in Ref. 12, p. 227;

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. R. Popper,Found. Phys. 12, 971 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Putman,Phys. Bl. 42 (4), 107 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Weingartner and G. Dorn, eds.,Foundations of Physics (Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. Kanitscheider, Hrsg.,Moderne Naturphilosophie (Königshausen und Neumann, Würzburg, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  19. K. Przibram Hrsg.,Schrödinger, Planck, Einstein, Lorentz-Briefe zur Wellenmechanik (Springer, Vienna, 1963), p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. von Neumann,Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik (Springer, Berlin, 1932); English edition: J. von Neumann,Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. J. Sakurai,Modern Quantum Mechanics (Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. Bohm,Phys. Rev. 85, 166, 180 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. Bohm and B. J. Hiley,Found. Phys. 14, 255 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. S. Bell,Int. J. Quant. Chem. (Quantum Chemistry Symposium)14, 155 (1980);

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. S. Bell, “Quantum mechanics for cosmologists,” in C. J. Isham, R. Penrose, and D. W. Sciama, eds.,Quantum Gravity 2 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1981), p. 611.

    Google Scholar 

  26. H. D. Zeh,Found. Phys. 18, 723 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  27. F. J. Belinfante,A Survey of Hidden-Variables Theories (Pergamon, New York, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. S. Bell,Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  29. F. Selleri, “The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox fifty years later,” in H. Kleinpoppen, J. S. Briggs, and H. O. Lutz, eds.,Fundamental Processes in Atomic Collision Physics (Plenum, New York, 1985), p. 421.

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. S. Bell,Physics 1, 195 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. S. Bell, “Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiments,” inProceedings, Symposium on Frontier Problems in High-Energy Physics, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, 1976, p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  32. B. d'Espagnat,Phys. Rep. 110, 201 (1984);

    Google Scholar 

  33. B. d'Espagnat,Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Benjamin, Reading, Massachusetts, 1976);

    Google Scholar 

  34. B. d'Espagnat, InSearch of Reality (Springer, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  35. F. Selleri, ed.,Quantum Mechanics versus Local Realism: The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox (Plenum, New York, 1988);

    Google Scholar 

  36. F. Selleri, “History of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox,” in Ref. 27(a), p. 1;

    Google Scholar 

  37. H. P. Stapp, “Are faster-than-light influences necessary?,” in Ref. 27(a), p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  38. P. H. Eberhard, “The EPR paradox: Roots and ramifications,” preprint Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory LBL-24199, 1987;Quantum Theory and Pictures of Reality, W. Schommers, ed. (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1989).

  39. K. Baumann and R. Sexl,Die Deutungen der Quantentheorie (Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  40. F. Selleri,Die Debatte um die Quantentheorie (Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1983);Quantum Paradoxes and Physical Reality (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  41. M. Jammer,The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  42. J. F. Clauser and A. Shimony,Rep. Prog. Phys. 41, 1881 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. B. d'Espagnat,Sci. Am., Nov. 1979, p. 128.

  44. N. D. Mermin,Physics Today, April 1985, p. 38.

  45. J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt,Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969);

    Google Scholar 

  46. J. F. Clauser and M. A. Horne,Phys. Rev. D 10, 526 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  47. J. S. Bell, “Introduction to the hidden-variable question,” inFoundations of Quantum Mechanics (Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”), B. d'Espagnat, ed. (Academic Press, New York, 1971), p. 171.

    Google Scholar 

  48. A. Aspect,Phys. Rev. D 14, 1944 (1976);

    Google Scholar 

  49. A, Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger,Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460 (1981);

    Google Scholar 

  50. A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger,Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91 (1982);

    Google Scholar 

  51. A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger,Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982);

    Google Scholar 

  52. A. Aspect and P. Grangier,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 43, 345 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  53. S. J. Freedman and J. F. Clauser,Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 938 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  54. A. Zeilinger,Phys. Lett. 118A, 1 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  55. H. Rauch, W. Treimer, and U. Bonse,Phys. Lett. 47A, 369 (1974);

    Google Scholar 

  56. G. Badurek, H. Rauch, and D. Tuppinger, “Polarized neutron interferomtry,” in Ref. 2a, p. 133.

    Google Scholar 

  57. D. M. Greenberger, “The neutron interferometer and the quantum mechanical super-position principle,” in Ref. 2d, p. 117;

    Google Scholar 

  58. S. Werner, “Neutron Interferometry at Missouri,” in Ref. 2a, p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Y. Aharanov and D. Bohm,Phys. Rev. 115, 485 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. A. Tonomura, T. Matsuda, R. Suzuki, A. Fukuhara, N. Osakabe, H. Umezaki, J. Endo, K. Shinagawa, Y. Sugita, and H. Fujiwara,Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1443 (1982);

    Google Scholar 

  61. A. Tonomura, “Experimental confirmation of the Aharanov-Bohm effect by electron holography,” in Ref. 2d, p. 169.

    Google Scholar 

  62. J. S. Bell,Speakable and Unspeakable in quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987). This is a collection of Bell papers concerning quantum mechanics.

    Google Scholar 

  63. G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, and T. Weber,Phys. Rev. D 34, 470 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. J. S. Bell, “Are there quantum jumps?,” in C. W. Kilmister, ed.,Schrödinger-Centenary Celebration of a Polymath (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987), p. 41; see also J. S. Bell, Ref. 44, p. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  65. J. S. Bell, “Beables for quantum field theory,” preprint CERN-TH.4035/84, 1984; see also J. S. Bell, Ref. 44, p. 173.

  66. F. M. Pipkin, in D. R. Bates, and B. Bederson, eds.,Advances in Atomic and Molecular Physics (Academic Press, New York, 1978), Vol. 14, p. 281.

    Google Scholar 

  67. A. J. Duncan and H. Kleinpoppen, “The experimental investigation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen question and Bell's Inequality,” in Ref. 27a, p. 175.

    Google Scholar 

  68. N. A. Törnqvist, “Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiments using the decays of η c orJ/Ψ into\(\Lambda \bar \Lambda \to \pi ^ - p\pi ^ + \bar p\),” in Ref. 27a, p. 115.

    Google Scholar 

  69. D. Home, “Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox for the\(K^\circ \bar K^\circ \) and\(B^\circ \bar B^\circ \) systems,” in Ref. 27a, p. 133.

    Google Scholar 

  70. R. A. Holt and F. M. Pipkin, “Quantum mechanics versus hidden variables: polarization correlation measurement on an atomic mercury cascade,” Harvard preprint, 1974.

  71. J. F. Clauser,Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 1223 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  72. E. S. Fry and R. C. Thompson,Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 465 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  73. W. Perrie, A. J. Duncan, H. J. Beyer, and H. Kleinpoppen,Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1790, 2647 (E) (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  74. L. R. Kasday, J. D. Ullmann, and C. S. Wu,Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 15, 586 (1970);Nuovo Cimento B 25, 633 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  75. G. Faraci, D. Gutkowski, S. Notarrigo, and A. R. Pennisi,Nuovo Cimento Lett. 9, 607 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  76. A. R. Wilson, J. Lowe, and D. K. Butt,J. Phys. G 2, 613 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  77. M. Bruno, M. D'Agostino, and C. Maroni,Nuovo Cimento B 40, 143 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  78. G. Bertolini, E. Diana, and A. Scotti,Nuovo Cimento B 63, 651 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  79. M. Lamehi-Rachti and W. Mittig,Phys. Rev. D 14, 2543 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Wien, Boltzmanngasse 5, Vienna, Austria

    R. A. Bertlmann

Authors
  1. R. A. Bertlmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Dedicated to J. S. Bell on his 60th birthday.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bertlmann, R.A. Bell's theorem and the nature of reality. Found Phys 20, 1191–1212 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01889465

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01889465

Keywords

Search

Navigation