Abstract
Patients with mental illness, and depression in particular, present clinicians and surrogate decision-makers with complex ethical dilemmas when they refuse life-sustaining non-psychiatric treatment. When treatment rejection is at variance with the beliefs and preferences that could be expected based on their premorbid or “authentic” self, their capacity to make these decisions may be called into question. If capacity cannot be demonstrated, medical decisions fall to surrogates who are usually advised to decide based on a substituted judgment standard or, when that is not possible, best interest. We propose that in cases where the patient meets the widely accepted cognitive criteria for capacity but is making decisions that appear inauthentic, the surrogate may best uphold patient autonomy by following a “restorative representation” model. We see restorative representation as a subset of substituted judgement in which the decision-maker retains responsibility for deciding as the patient would have, but discerns the decision their “truest self” would make, rather than inferring their current wishes, which are directly influenced by illness. Here we present a case in which the patient’s treatment refusal and previously undiagnosed depression led to difficulty determining the patient’s authentic wishes and placed a distressing burden on the surrogate decision-maker. We use this case to examine how clinicians and ethicists might better advise surrogates who find themselves making these clinically and emotionally challenging decisions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Appel, J. M. (2022). Trial by triad: Substituted judgment, mental illness and the right to die. Journal of Medical Ethics, 48(6), 358–361. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-107154. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
Appelbaum, P. S., & Grisso, T. (1988). Assessing patients’ capacities to consent to treatment. New England Journal of Medicine, 319(25), 1635–1638. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198812223192504. Erratum in: N Engl J Med 1989;320(11):748.
Appelbaum, P. S., & Roth, L. H. (1982). Competency to consent to research: A psychiatric overview. Archives of General Psychiatry, 39(8), 951–958. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290080061009
Baruth, J. M., & Lapid, M. I. (2017). Influence of psychiatric symptoms on decisional capacity in treatment refusal. AMA J Ethics, 19(5), 416–425. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.5.ecas1-1705
Batteux, E., Ferguson, E., & Tunney, R. J. (2019). On the likelihood of surrogates conforming to the substituted judgment standard when making end-of-life decisions for their partner. Medical Decision Making, 39(6), 651–660. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X19862800
Breitbart, W., Rosenfeld, B., Pessin, H., Kaim, M., Funesti-Esch, J., Galietta, M., Nelson, C. J., & Brescia, R. (2000). Depression, hopelessness, and desire for hastened death in terminally ill patients with cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284(22), 2907–2911. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.22.2907
Brudney, D. (2019). Changing the question. Hastings Center Report, 49(2), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.988
Butler, J. M., Hirshberg, E. L., Hopkins, R. O., Wilson, E. L., Orme, J. F., Beesley, S. J., Kuttler, K., & Brown, S. M. (2016). Preliminary identification of coping profiles relevant to surrogate decision making in the ICU. PLoS One, 11(11), e0166542. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166542
Craigie, J. (2013). Capacity, value neutrality and the ability to consider the future. Int J Law Context, 9(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552312000444
Dialectical behavioral therapy. (2023). https://dialecticalbehaviortherapy.com/
Elliott, C. (1997). Caring about risks. Are severely depressed patients competent to consent to research? Archives of General Psychiatry, 54(2), 113–116. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830140021003
Ganzini, L., Lee, M. A., Heintz, R. T., Bloom, J. D., & Fenn, D. S. (1994). The effect of depression treatment on elderly patients’ preferences for life-sustaining medical therapy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151(11), 1631–1636. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.151.11.1631
Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1998). Assessing competence to consent to treatment: A guide for physicians and other health professionals. Oxford University Press.
Guenther, C. L., Zhang, Y., & Sedikides, C. (2023). The authentic self is the self-enhancing self: A Self-Enhancement Framework of authenticity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1461672231160653. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231160653
Halpern, J. (2012). When concretized emotion-belief complexes derail decision-making capacity. Bioethics, 26(2), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01817.x. Epub 2010 May 17.
Hass, B. (2022). The values and rules of capacity assessments. Journal of Medical Ethics, 48(11), 816–820. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2021-107923
Hawkins, J., (2023). Affect, Values and problems assessing decision-making capacity. The American Journal of Bioethics, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2023.2224273
Hawkins, J., & Charland, L. C. (2020). Decision-making capacity. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/decision-capacity
Hindmarch, T., Hotopf, M., & Owen, G. S. (2013). Depression and decision-making capacity for treatment or research: A systematic review. BMC Medical Ethics, 14, 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-14-54
Illinois Health Care Surrogate Act 755 ILCS 40/5 (1998). Available at https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=2111&ChapterID=60. Last accessed July 12, 2023.
Jardas, E. J., Wasserman, D., & Wendler, D. (2022). Autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor. Journal of Medical Ethics, 48(5), 304–310. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2021-107629. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
Jimenez, X. F., Esplin, B. S., & Hernandez, J. O. (2015). Capacity consultation and contextual complexities: Depression, decisions, and deliberation. Psychosomatics, 56(5): 592-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psym.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
Kim, S. Y. H. (2016). The place of ability to value in the evaluation of decision-making capacity. In D. Moseley & G. Gala. (Ed.), Philosophy and psychiatry: Problems, intersections and new perspectives. Routledge.
Lutz, P. K., Newman, D. B., Schlegel, R. J., & Wirtz, D. (2023). Authenticity, meaning in life, and life satisfaction: A multicomponent investigation of relationships at the trait and state levels. Journal of Personality, 91(3), 541–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12753. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
Owen, G. S., Martin, W., & Gergel, T. (2018). Misevaluating the future: Affective disorder and decision-making capacity for treatment - A temporal understanding. Psychopathology, 51(6), 371–379. https://doi.org/10.1159/000495006. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
Rodríguez-Prat, A., Balaguer, A., Booth, A., & Monforte-Royo, C. (2017). Understanding patients’ experiences of the wish to hasten death: An updated and expanded systematic review and meta-ethnography. British Medical Journal Open, 7(9), e016659. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016659
Rosenblat, J. D., Kurdyak, P., Cosci, F., Berk, M., Maes, M., Brunoni, A. R., Li, M., Rodin, G., McIntyre, R. S., & Carvalho, A. F. (2020). Depression in the medically ill. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 54(4), 346–366. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
Roth, L. H., Meisel, A., & Lidz, C. W. (1977). Tests of competency to consent to treatment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 134(3), 279–284. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.134.3.279
Rubin, J., & Prager, K. M. (2018). Guide to considering nonpsychiatric medical intervention over objection for the patient without decisional capacity. Mayo Clin Proc, 93(7): 826–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 May 24.
Srebnik, D., & Russo, J. (2008). Use of psychiatric advance directives during psychiatric crisis events. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 35(4), 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-008-0172-0
Sullivan, M. D., & Youngner, S. J. (1994). Depression, competence, and the right to refuse lifesaving medical treatment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151(7), 971–978. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.151.7.971
Sutton, A. (2020). Living the good life: A meta-analysis of authenticity, well-being and engagement. Personality and individual differences, 153, 109645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109645. ISSN 0191–8869.
Swanson, J., Swartz, M., Ferron, J., Elbogen, E., & Van Dorn, R. (2006). Psychiatric advance directives among public mental health consumers in five U.S. cities: Prevalence, demand, and correlates. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 34(1), 43–57.
Tan, D. J., Hope, P. T., Stewart, D. A., & Fitzpatrick, P. R. (2006). Competence to make treatment decisions in anorexia nervosa: Thinking processes and values. PhilosPsychiatr Psychol, 13(4), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2007.0032
Torke, A. M., Alexander, G. C., & Lantos, J. (2008). Substituted judgment: The limitations of autonomy in surrogate decision making. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23(9), 1514–1517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0688-8 Epub 2008 Jul 10.
Tunzi, M., & Spike, J. P. (2014). Assessing capacity in psychiatric patients with acute medical illness who refuse care. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.14br01666
Vymĕtal, J. (2002). Autenticita v psychologii a psychoterapii [Authenticity in psychology and psychotherapy]. Sbornik Lekarsky, 103(3), 313–321.
Wendler, D. (2021). A call for a patient preference predictor. Critical Care Medicine, 49(6), 877–880. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004949
Wilkins, J. M. (2018). Narrative interest standard: A novel approach to surrogate decision-making for people with dementia. The Gerontologist, 58(6), 1016–1020. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx107
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Berkowitz, E., Trevick, S. Non-Psychiatric Treatment Refusal in Patients with Depression: How Should Surrogate Decision-Makers Represent the Patient’s Authentic Wishes?. HEC Forum (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-024-09522-9
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-024-09522-9