Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate power and employee relations

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corporations have not sufficiently yielded to social pressures for humanitarian reforms. To make such reforms requires that management give up some control. Giving up control contradicts traditional managerial philosophy. The bureaucratic structure of corporations gives management the power to virtually eliminate most social influences. An alternative to the bureaucratic corporation is a shared ownership corporation where investors, management, and low ranking employees all own the corporation. This alternative balances the power by giving all participants in the corporation power to influence policy. Without this redistribution of power, or something like it, any hope for significant humanitarian reforms is vain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, Lawrence C.: 1977,Property Rights: Philosophic Foundations (Routledge and Kegan Paul, Boston), pp. 100–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, Warren G.: 1966, ‘The Coming Death of Bureaucracy’, fromThink Magazine (IBM publishing), reprinted inOrganizational Shock, W. Clay Hammer (ed.) (John Wiley and Sons, New York 1980), pp. 390–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, Jeremy: 1802,Principles of the Civil Code (French ed.), inThe Theory of Legislation, C. K. Ogden (ed.) (Kegan Paul, London, 1931); reprinted inProberty: Mainstream and Critical Positions, C. B. MacPherson (ed.) (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1978), pp. 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, E. K.: 1981,Property and Prophets (fourth ed.) (Harper and Row Publ., New York), pp. 66–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, Rosabeth M: 1979, ‘Power Failure in Mangement Circuits’, inThe Harvard Business Review (President and Fellows of Harvard College) inOrganizational Shock, Hammer, pp. 404–417.

  • Locke, John: 1689,Second Treatise of Government, taken fromTwo Treatises of Government: A Critical Edition with an Introduction and Apparatus Criticus (revised ed.), Peter Laslett (ed.) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1964); reprinted inProperty: Mainstream and Critical Positions, C. B. MacPherson (ed.) pp. 000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, John, Stewart: 1871,Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy (seventh ed.), inCollected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume II, John M. Robson (ed.) (University of Toronto Press, London, 1965); reprinted inProperty: Mainstream and Critical Positions, C. B. MacPherson (ed.) (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1978), pp. 75–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, Charles: 1974, ‘Is Business Really Changing?’, fromOrganizational Dynamics (AMCOM pub.); reprinted inOrganizational Shock Hamner, pp. 418–429.

  • Smith, Adam: 1776,The Wealth of Nations, Book I and IV, reprinted by University of Chicago Press, (Chicago), 1976 inEthical Issues in Business, Donaldson and Werhane (ed.) (1979), pp. 134–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, Arnold A.: 1962, ‘Control in Organizations: Individual Adjustment and Organizational Performance’,Administrative Science Quarterly 7, pp. 236–257; reprinted inClassics of Organizational Behavior, Walter E. Natemeger, (ed.) (Moore Publ., Inc., Oak Park, Ill., 1978), pp. 267–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biesinger, G.G. Corporate power and employee relations. J Bus Ethics 3, 139–142 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02388815

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02388815

Keywords

Navigation