Abstract
Guiding our response in this essay is our view that current efforts to demarcate the role of the clinical ethicist risk reducing its complex network of authorizations to sites of power and payment. In turn, the role becomes susceptible to various ideologies—individualisms, proceduralisms, secularisms—that further divide the body from the web of significances that matter to that body, where only she, the patient, is located. The security of policy, standards, and employment will pull against and eventually sever the authorization secured by authentic moral inquiry. Instead of asking “What do I need to know?”, the question animating the drive to standardize will be “What is the policy or standard?” The claims of the authors in this issue of HEC Forum confirm these suspicions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andre, J. (2002). Bioethics as practice. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Babbie, E. (2004). The practice of social research (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomason.
Bishop, J. P. (2009). Foucauldian diagnostics: Space, time, and the metaphysics of medicine. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 34(4), 328–349.
Bishop, J. P., Fanning, J. B., & Bliton, M .J. (2009). Of goals and goods and floundering about: A dissensus report on Clinical Ethics Consultation. HEC Forum, 21(3), 275–291.
Bliton, M. J., & Finder, S. G. (2010). A brief reflection on the experience of responsibility in ethics consultation. Forthcoming in Formosan Journal of Medical Humanities.
Canadian Bioethics Society. (1999). Annual General Meeting Minutes. Unpublished document.
Chidwick, P., Bell, J., Connolly, E., Coughlin, M., Frolic, A., Hardingham, L., Webster G., & Zlotnik Shaul, R. (2010). Exploring a model role description for ethicists. HEC Forum, 22(1). doi: 10.1007/S10730-010-9126-5.
Engelhardt, H., & Tristram, Jr. (2009). Credentialing strategically ambiguous and heterogeneous social skills: The emperor without clothes. HEC Forum, 21(3), 293–306.
Fisher, P. (2004). The importance of variable names. In E. Babbie (Ed.), The practice of social research (10th ed., pp. 130–131). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomason.
Foucault, M. (1991). Birth of the clinic: an archaeology of medical perception (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books. Originally published under the title of Naissance de la clinique by Presses Universitaires de France in 1963.
Frolic, A., & Chadwick, P. (2010a). A qualitative study of “conflicts of interests and/or conflicting interests” among Canadian bioethicists, Part 1: Five cases, experiences and lessons learned. HEC Forum, 22(1). doi: 10.1007/S10730-010-9124-7.
Frolic, A., & Chadwick, P. (2010b). A qualitative study of “conflicts of interests and/or conflicting interests” among Canadian bioethicists, Part 2: Defining and managing conflicts. HEC Forum, 22(1). doi: 10.1007/S10730-010-9125-6.
Galbraith, K. L., & Perry, J. E. (2009). Saturday morning in the clinic. Hastings Center Report, 39(5), 24–26.
Mokwunye, N. O., Brown, V. A., Lynch, J. J., & DeRenzo, E. G. (2010). Hiring a hospital staff clinical ethicist: Creating a formalized behavioral interview model. HEC Forum, 22(1). doi: 10.1007/S10730-010-9121-x.
Pellegrino, E. D., & Thomasma, D. C. (1981). Philosophical basis for medical practice: Toward a philosophy and ethic of the healing professions. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pickstock, C. (1998). After writing: The liturgical consummation of philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.
Swiderski, D. M., Ettinger, K. M., Webber, M., & Dubler, N. N. (2010). The clinical ethics credentialing project: Preliminary notes from a pilot project to establish quality measures for ethics consultation. HEC Forum, 22(1). doi: 10.1007/S10730-010-9122-9.
Young, K. (1997). Presence in the flesh: The body in medicine. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zaner, R. M. (1988). Ethics and the clinical encounter. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10730-010-9132-7
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bishop, J.P., Fanning, J.B. & Bliton, M.J. Echo Calling Narcissus: What Exceeds the Gaze of Clinical Ethics Consultation?. HEC Forum 22, 73–84 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-010-9123-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-010-9123-8