This essay follows the strategy of Kant's "Copernican turn" bearing pragmatic features. It tries to show that this strategy is unjustified, that it forms theses about the character of reality and that it cannot provide the basis for "antirealism" developed--following Kant--by Richard Rorty. These problems indicate deficiencies of nominalist empiricism which Kant hasn't managed to refute and which today calls for further critical analyses of experience. Phenomenology in this context proves to be of particular importance.
CITATION STYLE
Blecha, I., & Vinkler, J. (2001). Kant, Pragmatic Antirealism and Husserl’s Phenomenology (in Slovenian). Phainomena, 10(37-38) 143-170.
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.