Abstract
The term flow refers to a particular type of experience characterized by feelings of fusion with an on-going activity, effortlessness and fluidity. This article concerns the results of an empirical investigation and phenomenological analysis of this type of experience. The analysis yields a distinction between three phenomenological structures, identified as arising in different combinations within concrete experiences of flow. These results are discussed in relation to the theories of Alfred Schutz and Erving Goffman regarding the organization of experience in everyday life, and in relation to the theory of Otto Friedrich Bollnow regarding moods in everyday life. The results of the analysis are also discussed in relation to different uses of the flow concept in a variety of contexts found in recent theoretical contributions. These differences of usage and approach are explained in the light of the results of the phenomenological analysis, which distinguishes qualitatively different varients within the phenomenon termed flow experience. In conclusion, the need to adopt a broader concept of experience in sociological analysis is emphasized, as well as the need for further empirical studies of the contextual frames of different variants of flow experiences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, P. (1981). Momentum. A Theory of Social Action. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Allison, Maria T. and Duncan, M.C. (1989). Women, Work and Flow. In M. Csikszentmihalyi and I.S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal Experience, pp. 118-138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bech, H. (1998). A Dung Beetle in Distress: Hans Christian Andersen Meets Karl Maria Kertbeny, Geneva, 1860: Some Notes on the Archaeology of Homosexuality and the Importance of Tuning. Journal of Homosexuality 35(3/4): 139-161.
Bergson, H. (1889/1980). Det Umiddelbare i Bevidstheden. Haderslev: Vinten. In French: Essai sur les données immédiates de la conscience. Paris: Bibliotheque de Philosophie Contemporaine.
Bloch, C. (1994). Er flow moderne. In A.O. Madsen et al. (Eds.), Den kultursociologiske Omtanke, pp. 287-305. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.
Bloch, C. (1996). Flowoplevelser-fænomenologi og teoretisk reflektion. Psyke og Logos 17(2): 416-434.
Bloch, C. (1997). Quality of Life in the Everyday Life of Modern Society. In C.J. Kristensen (Ed.), The Meeting of the Waters, pp. 55-75. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
Bollnow, O.F. (1941/1974). Das Wesen der Stimmungen. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.
Carli, M., Fave A.D. and Massimini, F. (1989). The quality of experience in the flow channels: comparison of Italian and U.S. students. In M. Csikszentmihalyi and I.S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal Experience, pp. 288-307. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975a). Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975b). Play and Intrinsic Rewards. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 5(3): 41-65.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Csikszentmihalyi I.S. (Eds.) (1989). Optimal Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). The Evolving Sense of self. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
Dayan, D. and Katz, E. (1988). Articulating consensus: The ritual in rhetoric of media events. In J. Alexander (Ed.), Durkheimian Sociology: Cultural Studies, pp. 161-186. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Denzin, N.K. and Keller, C.M. (1981). Frame Analysis Reconsidered. Contemporary Sociology 10(1): 52-60.
Denzin, N.K. (1984). On Understanding Emotion. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Durkheim, E. (1912/1995). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: The Free Press.
Eckartsberg, R. von (1986). Life-world Experience. Washington: Centre for Advanced Research in Phenomenology and University Press of America.
Giddens, A. (1994). Beyond Left and Right. Oxford: Polity Press.
Giorgi, A. Fischer, C.T. and Murray E.L. (Eds.) (1975). Duquesnes Studies in Phenomenological Psychology. Vol 1. Pittsburgh.
Goffman, E. (1974/1986). Frame Analysis. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Heidegger, M. (1927/1972). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Hetherington, K. (1996). Identity Formation, Space and Social Centrality. Theory, Culture and Society 13(4): 33-52.
Hycner, R.C. (1985). Some Guidelines for the Phenomenological Analysis of Interview Data. Human Studies 8: 279-303.
MacAloon, J.J. (1984). Olympic Games and the Theory of Spectacle in Modern Society. In J.J. MacAloon, (Ed.), Rite, Drama, Festival and Spectacle, pp. 141-182. Philadelphia.
Maslow, A. (1976). Religion, Values and Peak-experiences. New York: Penguin Books.
Nietzsche, F. (1911). Nachgelassene Werke. Vol. 16. Leipzig.
Paget, M.A. (1990). Unlearning not to speak. Human Studies 13: 147-161.
Rothenbuhler, E.E. (1988). The Liminal Fight: Mass Strikes as Ritual and Interpretation. In J. Alexander (Ed.), Durkheimian Sociology: Cultural Studies, pp. 66-89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schutz, A. (1962/1973). Collected Papers 1. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Turner, V.W. (1983). Liminal to Liminoid in Play, Flow and Ritual. An Essay in Comparative Symbology. In J.C. Harris and R.J. Park (Eds.), Play, Games and Sports, pp. 123-164. Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers.
Zerubavel, E. (1991). The Fine Line. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bloch, C. Flow: Beyond Fluidity and Rigidity. Human Studies 23, 43–61 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005510527727
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005510527727