Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton April 1, 2016

Does one truly need to belong?: A case for the need to meaningfully exist

  • Mariana Bockarova EMAIL logo
From the journal Semiotica

Abstract

Baumeister and Leary’s (1995) seminal work on the “Belonging Hypothesis” proposed an important theory that catalyzed an abundance of research predicated on the hypothesized essential need for humans to establish and preserve interpersonal relationships. However, this premise cannot fully explain certain human phenomena that have historically occurred, and still continue to occur today, including the existence of psychopathology, self-selected seclusion, and unrequited love. Thus, the need to belong is unlikely to be a vital motivation capable of encompassing the needs of all human beings. Instead, this paper proposes the need to meaningfully matter, or, to find meaning within one’s life, regardless of one’s relation to others, as a primary motivation from which the need to belong emerges.

References

Bandura, Albert. 1977. Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.Search in Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., & M. R. Leary. 1995. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin 117. 497–529.10.4324/9781351153683-3Search in Google Scholar

Boscawen, W. St. Chad. 1903. The first of empires: “Babylon of the Bible” in the light of latest research. London: Harper.Search in Google Scholar

Erikson, Erik. H. 1994. Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: W. W. Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Horton, Donald & R. Richard Wohl. 1956. Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance, Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes 19. 215–229.10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049Search in Google Scholar

Joy, Annamma. 2001. Gift giving in Hong Kong and the continuum of social ties. Journal of Consumer Research 28(2). 239–256.10.1086/322900Search in Google Scholar

Lilienfeld, Scott O. & Hal Arkowitz. 2007. What “psychopath” means. Scientific American Mind 18(6). 80–81.10.1038/scientificamericanmind1207-80Search in Google Scholar

Long, Christopher R. & James R. Averill. 2003. Solitude: An exploration of benefits of being alone. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 33(1). 21–44.10.1111/1468-5914.00204Search in Google Scholar

Maslow, Abraham. 1954. Motivation and personality. New York: Harper.Search in Google Scholar

Max-Neef, Manfred. 1992. Development and human needs. In M. Max-Neef & P. Ekins (eds.), Real-life economics: Understanding wealth creation, 197–213. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Olds, Jacqueline & Richard S. Schwartz. 2009. The lonely American: Drifting apart in the twenty-first century. Boston: Beacon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pettinger, Tejvan. 2006. Biography of Emily Dickinson. http://www.biographyonline.net/poets/emily_dickinson.html (accessed 21 February 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Piaget, Jean. 1995. Sociological studies. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Sommer, Jeffrey D. 1999. The Shanidar IV “flower burial”: A re-evaluation of Neanderthal burial ritual. Cambridge Archeological Journal 9. 127–129.10.1017/S0959774300015249Search in Google Scholar

Wishart, Alfred Wesley. 1902. A short history of monks and monasteries. Trenton, NJ: A. Brandt.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-4-1
Published in Print: 2016-5-1

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 27.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2016-0026/html
Scroll to top button