Skip to main content

Theoretical Perspectives Concerning Modeling Consumer Behavior Influences on CSR and Marketing Roles in Shaping Consumer Perceptions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Current Issues in Corporate Social Responsibility

Abstract

Consumers are stakeholders of an organization in many ways having a complex dimension. They are primarily ultimate beneficiaries of products and services. Consumers are also members of society interested in environmental issues and fair trade, members of local community (where the organization has its headquarters in the region), can be employed, relatives or friends of employees, can be shareholders of the organization. Consumers can play an important role in the regulation of entrepreneurial behavior if they are willing to reward socially responsible organizations by changing their purchasing behavior (preferring products and services of those organizations that invest in social responsibility programs). In this paper we propose to create a theoretical framework to determine the influence of CSR actions on the purchasing behavior (using the seven core subjects of ISO 26000) and the impact of marketing and CSR communication (its channels and tools) on purchasing decisions. Within these bidirectional approaches we will focus on three issues: consumer expectations on CSR activities, the managers’ perception on these expectations, and the decisions of managers on CSR actions and marketing tools and channels used for communicating CSR. Since there is a gap between these three aspects, it is highly important not only evaluating CSR activities but also consumer perceptions over these activities, and the effectiveness of marketing channels and tools used for communicating CSR. The proposed instrument allows organizations to evaluate these aspects and managers to make the best decisions concerning the selection of appropriate CSR activities, choosing channels and marketing tools to enable effective communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the s back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreu, L., Mattila, A. S., & Aldás, J. (2011). Effects of message appeal when communicating CSR initiatives. In S. Okazaki (Ed.), Breaking new ground in theory and practice, Advances in advertising research (Vol. 2, pp. 261–275). Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auger, P., Burke, P., Devinney, T., & Louviere, J. (2003). What will consumers pay for social product features? Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 281–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barone, M. J., Miyazaki, A. D., & Taylor, K. A. (2000). The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: Does one good turn deserve another? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 248–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, S. C. (2006). Consumers’ perceptions of and responses to CSR: So little is known so far. In M. Morsing & S. C. Beckmann (Eds.), Strategic CSR communication (pp. 163–183). Copenhagen: DJOF Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, S. C., Morsing, M., & Reisch, L. (2006). Strategic CSR communication: An emerging field. In M. Morsing & S. C. Beckmann (Eds.), Strategic CSR communication (pp. 11–36). Copenhagen: DJOF Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berens, G., van Riel, C. B. M., & van Bruggen, G. H. (2005). Corporate associations and consumer product responses: The moderating role of corporate brand dominance. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 35–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BignĂ©, E., Currás-PĂ©rez, R., & Aldás-Manzano, J. (2012). Dual nature of cause-brand fit influence on corporate social responsibility consumer perception. European Journal of Marketing, 46(3/4), 575–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britt, D. L., & Perks, J. K. (2015). The influence of interactive, non-interactive, implicit and explicit CSR communication on young adults’ perception of UK supermarkets’ corporate brand image and reputation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(2), 178–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creyer, E. H., & Ross, W. T. (1997). The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: Do consumers really care about business ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(6), 421–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisend, M. (2006). Source credibility in marketing communications. Marketing: Journal of Research and Management, 2(1), 43–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, D. A., Avila, M. G., & de Faria, M. D. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and consumers’ perception of price. Social Responsibility Journal, 6(2), 208–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folkes, V. S., & Kamins, M. A. (1999). Effects of information about firms – ethical and unethical actions on consumer attitudes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), 243–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, T., & Peloza, J. (2011). How does corporate social responsibility create value for consumers? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(1), 48–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (1992). The general theory of marketing ethics: A retrospective and revision. In N. C. Smith & J. A. Quelch (Eds.), Ethics and marketing (pp. 775–784). Homewood, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economic. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., & Hult, G. T. M. (1999). Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 455–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business Horizons, 52(4), 357–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megicks, P., Memery, J., & Williams, J. (2008). Influences on ethical and socially responsible shopping: Evidence from the UK grocery sector. Journal of Marketing Management, 24(5-6), 637–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L., & Webb, D. (2005). The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(1), 121–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M., Schultz, M., & Nielsen, K. U. (2008). The Catch 22 of communicating CSR: Findings from a Danish study. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 92–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, Company. (2008). Corporate ethics and fair trading: A Nielsen global consumer report. New York: The Nielsen Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ă–berseder, M., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Murphy, P. E. (2013). CSR practices and consumer perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1839–1851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implication for future research (SERVQUAL). The Journal of Marketing, 49, 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phole, G., & Hittner, J. (2008). Attaining sustainability growth through corporate social responsibility. New York: IBM Global Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podnar, K. (2008). Guest editorial: Communicating corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomering, A., & Dolnicar, S. (2009). Assessing the prerequisite of successful CSR implementation: Are consumers aware of CSR initiatives? Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomering, A., & Johnson, L. W. (2009). Advertising corporate social responsibility initiatives to communicate corporate image: Inhibiting scepticism to enhance persuasion. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 14(4), 420–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisch, L. (2006). Communicating CSR to consumers: An empirical study. In M. Morsing & S. C. Beckmann (Eds.), Strategic CSR communication (pp. 185–211). Copenhagen: DJOF Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeltz, L. (2012). Consumer-orientated CSR communication: Focusing on ability or morality? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 17(1), 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serpa, D., & Fourneau, L. (2007). O Consumidor Etico Brasileiro: Realidade ou Ficcao? Revista de Administracao Contemporanea, 11(3), 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, J. A. (2009). Both sides now: Aligning external and internal branding for a socially responsible era. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 27(5), 681–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. C., Palazzo, G., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2010). Marketing’s consequences: Stakeholder marketing and supply chain CSR. INSEAD Working Paper Series, 2010/17/ISIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaen, V. (2002). Consumers’ perceptions, evaluations and reactions to CSR activities. 10th international conference of the Greening of Industry Network, Göteborg, Sweden, June 23–26, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaen, V., & Vanhamme, J. (2004). When “what you say” matters less than “where you say it”: Influence of corporate social responsibility arguments and source of information on consumers’ reactions and attitudes toward the company. Proceedings of the 33rd European Marketing Academy (EMAC) Conference. Murcia: University of Murcia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turban Daniel, B., & Greening Daniel, W. (1996). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, Vol., 40(3), 658–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlachos, P. A., Tsamakos, A., Vrechopoulos, A. P., & Avramidis, P. K. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: Attributions, loyalty, and the mediating role of trust. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(2), 170–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. (2000). Integrity and mindfulness: Foundations of corporate citizenship. In M. McIntosh and A. Warhurst (Eds.), 2000 Annual Warwick Corporate Citizenship Conference, 10–11 July. Coventry: University of Warwick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, T., Bicen, P., & Hall, Z. R. (2008). The dark side of retailing: Towards a scale of corporate social irresponsibility. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 36(2), 124–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, A., & Anderson, R. B. (2011). A multi-staged model of consumer responses to CSR communication. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 41(2), 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, D. J., Mohr, L. A., & Harris, K. E. (2008). A re-examination of socially responsible consumption and its measurement. Journal of Business Research, 61(2), 91–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, K., MacDonnell, R., & Ellard, J. H. (2012). Belief in a just world: Consumer intentions and behaviors toward ethical products. Journal of Marketing, 76(1), 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catalina Sitnikov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bocean, C.G., Sitnikov, C., Tudor, S. (2018). Theoretical Perspectives Concerning Modeling Consumer Behavior Influences on CSR and Marketing Roles in Shaping Consumer Perceptions. In: Idowu, S., Sitnikov, C., Simion, D., Bocean, C. (eds) Current Issues in Corporate Social Responsibility. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70449-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics