Skip to main content
Log in

A problem of sociological praxis

The case for interventive observation in field work

  • Published:
Theory and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Adorno, Theodor W.,Zur Metakritik der Erkenntnisstheorie. Studien uber Husserl und die phanomenologischen Antinomien, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, Louis,Pour Marx, Paris: Maspero, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apthorpe, Raymond, “Comment,” in Jarvie (1969).

  • Becker, Howard S. “Whose Side Are We On?”,Social Problems, 14 (Winter), 1967, pp. 239–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • — “Reply to Riley's ‘Partisanship and Objectivity,’”American Sociologist, 6 (February, 1971, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beissner, Friedrich,Der Erzaehler Franz Kafka, Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter L.,Invitation to Sociology, Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • — “Sociology and Freedom”.American Sociologist, 6 (February), 1971, pp. 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter L. and Thomas Luckmann,The Social Construction of Reality, Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum Norman, “The Crisis in Marxist Sociology,”Social Research 35 (Summer), 1968, pp. 348–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, Egon, “Objectivity and Realism in Sociology,” in Psathas, (1973), pp. 109–125.

  • Bottomore, T. B. (ed.),Karl Marx. Selected Writings in Sociology and Social Philosophy, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunt, Lodewijk, “Comment” in Nash and Wintrob (1972).

  • Coser, Lewis A., “Participant Observation and the Military, An Exchange,”American Sociological Review, 24. 1959, pp. 397–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dictionnaire de l'Economie Politque, Paris, Quillanmin, 1854.

  • Dollard, John,Caste and Class in a Southern Town, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreitzel, Hans-Peter, “Social Science and the Problem of Rationality: Notes on the Sociology of Technocrats,”Politics and Society, 2 (Winter), 1972, pp. 165–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, Kai T., “A Comment on Disguised Observation in Sociology,”Social Problems, 14 (Spring), 1967, pp. 366–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, Henry, “Sociology and Praxis,”Social Theory and Practice, 1, 1971, pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowits, Henry and Gerald M. Schaflander, “A Manifesto for Sociologists: Institution Formation — a New Sociology,”Social Problems, 15 (Spring), 1968, pp. 399–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrarotti, Franco, “A proposito Kurt Wolff in occasione del suo 60° compleanno,”La Critica Sociologia, 25 (Spring), 1973, pp. 181–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortune, R., “Arapesh Warfare,” inAmerican Anthropologist, 41, 1939, pp. 22–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt Institute for Social Research: Aspects of Sociology, Boston: Beacon Press, 1972. (First published as:Soziologische Exkurse, Frankfurt: Europaische Verlagsanstalt, 1956).

  • Freire, Paolo,Pedagogy of the Oppressed, New York: Seabury Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Werner, “Empirische Socialforschung als Politische Aktion,”Soziale Welt. Zeitschrift für Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung und Praxis, 1970, pp. 21–22 fasc. 1.

  • Galliher, John F., “The Protection of Human Subjects: A Reexamination of the Professional Code of Ethics,”The American Sociologist, 8 (August), 1973, pp. 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, Herbert J.,The Urban Villagers; Group and Class in the Life of Italian Americans, New York: The Free Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Levittowners, New York: Random House-Vintage Books, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving,Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Immates, Garden City: Anchor Books, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göhre, Paul,Three Months in a Workshop. A Practical Study, London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co. 1895. (Originally as:Drei Monate Fabrikarbeiter und Handwerksbursche. Eine praktische Studie, Leipzig: F. W. Grunow, 1891.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, Raymond L., “Roles in Sociological Field Observations,”Social Forces,1958, pp. 217–223.

  • Gouldner, Alvin W., “Marxism and Social Theory,”Theory and Society, 1, 1974, pp. 17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, Alvin W., “The Sociologist as Partisan: Sociology and the Welfare State,”The American Sociologist, 3 (May), 1968, pp. 103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutkind, Peter, “Comment” in Jarvie (1969).

  • Habermas, Jürgen,Theory and Practice, Boston: Beacon Press, 1973. (Partial translation ofTheorie und Praxis, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verl., 1967.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindess, Barry, “The ‘Phenomenological’ Sociology of Alfred Schutz,”Economy and Society, 1 (February), 1972, pp. 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, Alan R., “Participant Intervention in the Field,”Human Organization, 14 (Spring), 1955, pp. 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, Alan R., “The Research and Development Approach to the Study of Change,”Human Organization, 17 (Spring), 1958, pp. 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harowitz, Irving L., “Mainliners and Marginals: The Human Shape of Sociological Theory,” in: Llewellyn Gross (ed.)Sociological Theory: Inquiries and Paradigms, New York: Harper and Row, 1967, pp. 358–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Everett C.,The Sociological Eye. Selected Papers on Work, Self, and the Study of Society, Chicago and New York: Aldine Atherton, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • “The Place of Field Work in Social Science,” in: Buford H, Junker,Field Work: An Introduction to the Social Sciences, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960. (Reprinted in Hughes (1971) pp. 496–506.)

  • “Teaching as Field Work.”The American Sociologist, 5, (February) 1970. (Reprinted in: Hughes (1971) pp. 566–576.

  • Humphreys, Laud,Tea Room Trade, Chicago: Aldine, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, Del (ed.),Reinventing Anthropology, New York: Random House, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvie, I. C., “The Problem of Ethical Integrity in Participant Observation,”Current Anthropology, 10 (December) 1969, 505–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzardo, Dario, “Intervento socialista nella lotta operaia: l'inchiesta operaia di Marx,”Quaderni Rossi, 5, 1965.

  • Levine, Donald N. (ed. and transl.),Georg Simmel. On Individuality and Social Forms, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971 (Orig. publ. 1908.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Oscar,Life in a Mexican Village: Tepoztlán Restudied, Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukacs, Georg,History and Class Consciousness. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1971. (First published as:Geschichte und Klassenbewusstsein, Berlin: Malik, 1923.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynd, Robert,Knowledge For What? Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macciocchi, Maria Antonietta,Lettere dal Interno del P.C.I. a Louis Althusser, Milano: Feltrinelli, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, Bronislaw,Argonauts of the Western Pacific, New York: E. P. Dutton, 1961 (Reprint of work orig. publ. in 1922).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maquet, Jacques J., “Objectivity in Anthropology,”Current Anthropology, 5, 1964, pp. 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich.Werke (“MEW”) vols. 4 and 19 Berlin: Dietz Verlag.

  • Mead, Margaret,Sex and Temperament in Three Primitive Societies, New York: W. W. Morrow, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M., “The Participant Observer and the ‘Over-Rapport,’”American Sociological Review, 17, 1952, pp. 97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molotch, Harvey M. and Marilyn Lester, “Accidents, Scandals, and Routines: Resources for Insurgent Methodology,”The Insurgent Sociologist, 3. (Summer), 1973, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, Dennison and Ronald Wintrob, “The Emergence of Self-Consciousness in Ethnography,”Current Anthropology, vol. 13, 5, 1972, pp. 527–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaus, Martin, “The Professional Organization of Sociology: A View from Below,”The Antioch Review, 24, 1969.

  • Panzieri, Raniero, “Uso socialista dell ‘inchiesta operaia,’”Quaderni Rossi, 5, 1965.

  • Peattie, Lisa R., “Interventionism and Applied Science in Anthropology,”Human Organization, 17 (Spring), 1958, pp. 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powdermaker, Hortense,After Freedom: A Cultural Study in the Deep South, New York: Viking Press, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psathas, George (ed.),Phenomenological Sociology: Issues and Applications, New York, London: John Wiley and Sons, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfield, Robert,Tepoztlán: A Mexican Village, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, Gresham, “Partisanship and Objectivity in the Social Sciences,”American Sociologist, 6 (February), 1971 pp. 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubel, Maximilien (ed.),Karl Marx. Oeuvres, vol. 1. Paris: Gallimard, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubel, Maximilien,Karl Marx: Essai de biographie intellectuelle, Paris: Marcel Rivière, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Morris S. and Charlotte Green Schwartz, “Problems in Participant Observation,”American Journal of Sociology, 60, 1955, pp. 343–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Morris S., “The Uses of Sociology in the Mental Hospital,”Social Problems (Winter), 1963, pp. 219–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shokeid, Moshe, “Field Work as Predicament Rather than Spectacle,”Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 11, 1970, pp. 111–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shostak, Arthur (ed.),Sociology in Action. Case Studies in Social Problems and Directed Social Change, Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg, Gideon (ed.),Ethics, Politics and Social Research, Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spranger, Eduard, “Der psychologische Perspektivismus im Roman. Eine Skizze zur Theorie des Romans erläutert an Goethes Hauptwerken,” Frankfurt A.M.:Jahrbuch des Freien Deutschen Hochstifts, 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tax Sol, “The Fox Project,”Human Organization, 17 (Spring) 1958, pp. 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, Barrie,Resisting the Draft: An Ethnography of the Draft Resistance Movement, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Brandeis University, 1971.

  • Vidich, Arthur J., Joseph Bensman, Maurice R. Stein (eds.),Reflections on Community Studies, New York, London, Sydney: John Wiley and Sons, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallraff, Günter,13 unerwünschte Reportagen, Cologne: Kiepenheuer und Witsch, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wax, Murray L., “Tenting With Malinowski,”American Sociological Review, 37 (February), 1972, pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Hilde, “Die Enquête Ouvrière von Karl Marx,”Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung. voll fasc. 1: 1936, pp. 76–98. (Reprinted in: Friedrich Fuerstenberg,Industriesoziologie. Neuwied: Luchterhand, 1959. pp. 81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, Kurt H., “Values in Action: A Comment.”Human Organization 17 (Spring) 1958, pp. 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Surrender and Community Study: The Study of Loma,” in: Vidich et al. (1964), pp. 233–263.

  • Versuch zu einer Wissenssoziologie, Berlin und Neuwied: Luchterhand, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Toward Radicalism in Sociology and Every Day,” in: Psathas, George (ed.) (1973), pp. 47–58.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michal Bodemann, Y. A problem of sociological praxis. Theor Soc 5, 387–420 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01701852

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01701852

Navigation