Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How HECs can better relate to physicians

  • Articles
  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fletcher JC, Hoffmann DE. Ethics committees: Time to experiment with standards. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1994; 120:335–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegler M. Ethics committees: Decisions by bureaucracy. Hastings Center Report. 1986; 16:22–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ross JW, et al., Health care ethics committees: The next generation, Chicago, IL: American Hospital Publishing; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fleetwood J, Unger SS. Institutional ethics committees and the shield of immunity. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1994; 120:320–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lo B. Behind closed doors: Promises and pitfalls of ethics committees. New England Journal of Medicine. 1987; 317:46–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barlotta FM, Scheirton LS. The role of a hospital ethics committee in educating members of the medical staff. HEC Forum. 1989; 1:151–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Medical College of Wisconsin. “bioethics-line” (listproc@its.mcw. edu).

Download references

Authors
  1. Eugene V. Boisaubin M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boisaubin, E.V. How HECs can better relate to physicians. HEC Forum 8, 157–167 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00115875

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00115875

Search

Navigation