Skip to main content
Log in

Hermeneutics and symbolic interactionism: The problem of solipsism

  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bellah, R.N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. and Jepton, S. (1985).Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American Life. Berkeley: The University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. (1963).Invitation to sociology. Garden City: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P.L., Berger, B. and Kellner, H. (1974).The homeless mind: Modernization and consciousness. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. and Luckman, T. (1966).The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, A. (1971). Theorizing. In J. Douglas (Ed.),Understanding everyday life. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, A. (1974). Sociology, wrongdoing, and akrasia: An attempt to think Greek about the problem of theory and practice. In R.A. Scott and J. Douglas (Eds.),Theoretical perspectives on deviance. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, A. and McHugh, P. (1984).Self-reflection in the arts and sciences. Atlantic Highlands: NJ: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory.American Journal of Sociology 19: 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969).Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charon, J. (1989).Symbolic interactionism: An introduction, an interpretation, an integration, 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, J. (1988).The predicament of culture: Twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couch, C. (1988). Doing research: What Blumer told us to do and what he did not tell us but should have. Paper presented at the 1988 Annual Qualitative Research Conference, Windsor, Ontario.

  • Collins, R. (1985).Three sociological traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallmayer, F. (1989). Hermeneutics and deconstruction: Gadamer and Derrida in dialogue. In D.P. Michelfelder and R.E. Palmer (Eds.),Dialogue and deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida encounter, 75–92. Albany: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallmayer, F. and McCarthy, T. (Eds.) (1977).Understanding and social inquiry. Notre Dame: Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, L. (1990). Hermeneutics and qualitative sociology: The problem of concept formation. Paper presented at the 1990 Qualitative Research Conference: Exploring New Frontiers, York University, Toronto.

  • Denzin, N. (1991). The spaces of postmodernism: Reading Plummer on Blumer.Symbolic Interaction 13(2): 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, B. (1975).Social theory and political practice. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friel, B. (1980).The faith healer. London and Boston: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1975).Truth and method. New York: The Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1986).The idea of the good in Platonic Aristotelian philosophy. Trans. P.C. Smith. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1989). Hermeneutics and logocentrism. In D.P. Michelfelder and R.E. Palmer (Eds.),Dialogue and deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida encounter. Albany: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967).Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1988).The theory of communicative action, Vol. II:Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Cambridge, England: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (1984).Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K. and Mulkey, M. (Eds.) (1983).Science observed. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, C. (1978).The culture of narcissism. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (Eds.) (1970).Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979).Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlejohn, S. (1989).Theories of human communication. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maines, D. (1989a). Repackaging Blumer: The myth of Herbert Blumer's astructural bias.Studies in Symbolic Interaction 10: 383–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maines, D. (1989b). Herbert Blumer on the possibility of science in the practice of sociology. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 18(2): 160–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, P., Raffel, S., Foss, D. and Blum, A. (1974).On the beginnings of social inquiry. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, R. (1969).Hermeneutics. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato (1956).Apology. Trans. F.J. Church. Trans. revised R.D. Cumming. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, K. (1991). Staying in the empirical world: Symbolic interactionism and postmodernism.Symbolic Interaction 13(2): 155–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prus, R. (1988). Where are the social sciences (un)headed?: Contemporary challenges to a theory grounded in action. Paper presented at the 1988 Qualitative Research Conference: A Tribute to Herbert Blumer, Windsor, Ontario.

  • Sharrock, W. and Anderson, B. (1986).The ethnomethodologists. Sussex: Ellis Horwood Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidmore, W. (1975).Theoretical thinking in sociology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1977). Interpretation and the sciences of man. In F. Dallmayer and T. McCarthy (Eds.),Understanding and social inquiry. Notre Dame: Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. (1974).Ethnomethodology. Middlesex: Penguin Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R., and Wolf, A. (1991).Contemporary sociological theory: Continuing the classical tradition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1947).The theory of social and economic organization. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1958).The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: Scribner's.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T.P. (1970). Normative and interpretive paradigms in sociology. In J.D. Douglas (Ed.),Understanding everyday life. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. and Wieder, D.L. (1970). Ethnomethodology and the problem of order: Comment on Denzin. In J.D. Douglas (Ed.),Understanding everyday life. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonner, K. Hermeneutics and symbolic interactionism: The problem of solipsism. Hum Stud 17, 225–249 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323603

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323603

Keywords

Navigation