Abstract
The article discusses the possibility of using the cognitive tools of semiotics (theory of signs) for theoretical considerations of social structures from the anthropological perspective. In the literature on the subject, this approach is defined as semiotic anthropology, a term coined by Milton Singer. The article emphasizes the possibilities, untapped within Singer’s work, of further epistemological research within the scope of the “cultural theory of signs” and reduction of the paradigms of research on culture from philosophical and philological as well as anthropological and ethnographic paradigms to a semiotic paradigm, enabling the analysis of meanings of cultural messages (as broadly understood), from architecture and painting and even eating habits (e.g., cooking) to systems of values and literature. In this sense, semiotic anthropology represents the position of “mild holism” and becomes a tool supporting the exploration of culture.
References
Ayer, Alfred J. 1940. The foundations of empirical knowledge. London: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar
Ayer, Alfred J. 1956. The problem of knowledge. London: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar
Ayer, Alfred J. (ed.). 1959. Logical positivism: The library of philosophical movements. New York: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar
Barker, Graeme. 2006. The agricultural revolution in prehistory: Why did foragers become farmers? Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199281091.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1964. Eléments de semiology. Communications 4(1). 91–135.10.3406/comm.1964.1029Search in Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1965. Le degré zéro de l’ecriture, suive de: Eléments de semiology. Paris: Gonthier.Search in Google Scholar
Boroch, Robert. 2013. Na marginesie semiotyki kultury: Problemy tzw. nauk kulturoznawczych. In M. Guławska-Gawkowska and G. Zeldowicz (eds.), Znaki czy nie znaki?, 21–39. Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.10.31338/uw.9788323520252.pp.21-40Search in Google Scholar
Boroch, Robert. 2017. Bagrationovsk 2015 (Russia) – Anthropological reconnaissance: Proposal for a field work. Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology 2. 92–99.10.23951/2307-6119-2017-2-92-99Search in Google Scholar
DʼAndrade, Roy. 1995. The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166645Search in Google Scholar
Janus, Elżbieta, Maria Renata Mayenowa, Stefan Żółkiewski & Jerzy Faryno. 1975. Semiotyka kultury. Warsaw: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.Search in Google Scholar
Leach, Edmund. 1985. Review of man’s glassy essence: Explorations in semiotic anthropology. American Ethnologist 12. 154–156.10.1525/ae.1985.12.1.02a00130Search in Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1963. Structural anthropology, Claire Jacobson (trans.). New York: Basic.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Jurij. 2008. Uniwersum umysłu: Semiotyczna teoria kultury, Bogusław Żyłko (trans.). Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.Search in Google Scholar
Metz, Elizabeth. 2007. Semiotic anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology 36. 337–353.10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094417Search in Google Scholar
Ogborn, Jon. 2015. Science and commonsense. https://web.phys.ksu.edu/icpe/Publications/teach2/Ogborn.pdf (accessed 29 January 2015).Search in Google Scholar
Parmentier, Richard J. 1994. Signs and society: Studies in semiotic anthropology. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. & V. Welby-Gregory. 1998. Semiotic and significs: The correspondence between C. S. peirce and victoria, lady welby. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Roger, J. 1997. Buffon: A life in natural history, S. L. Bonnefoi (trans.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Scruton, Roger. 2012. Modern philosophy: An introduction and survey. London: Bloomsbury Reader.Search in Google Scholar
Singer, Milton. 1972. When a great tradition modernizes: An anthropological approach to Indian civilization. New York: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar
Singer, Milton. 1978. For a semiotic anthropology. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Sight, sound, and sense, 202–231. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Singer, Milton. 1984. Man’s glassy essence: Explorations in semiotic anthropology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Singer, Milton. 1985. Comments on semiotic anthropology. American Ethnologist 12(3). 549–553.10.1525/ae.1985.12.3.02a00150Search in Google Scholar
Singer, Milton. 1991. Semiotics of cities, selves, and cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110857757Search in Google Scholar
Stopa, Roman. 1948. Narodziny myśli i mowy ludzkiej: Studium z pogranicza psychologii, socjologii i praindoeuropeistyki. Kraków: Nauczycielska Spółka Wydawnicza Książnica Powszechna.Search in Google Scholar
Tylor, Edward B. 1871. Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, art, and custom. Boston: Estes and Lauriat.Search in Google Scholar
White, Leslie Alvin. 1949. The science of culture: A study of man and civilization. New York: Grove Press.Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward O. 2012. The social conquest of earth. New York: W. W. Norton.Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
