At the Verge of ‘Is’ and ‘Could Be’: Storytelling as Medium to Develop Critical Ethical Skills

Botes, Marietjie; Rossi, Arianna

doi:10.1007/978-3-031-51560-6_17

Marietjie Botes^28,29 &
Arianna Rossi²⁸

Part of the book series: The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology ((ELTE,volume 42))

52 Accesses

Abstract

Stories about the socio-technical impact of the outcomes of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) on the world may create a concrete sense of the future consequences they may cause. Such stories may offer students and early career researchers who (will) develop, test, and deploy such technologies insights into their effects on individuals, other living beings, the environment, and society. In this paper, we argue that this method, known as storytelling in academic literature, can be effectively used to embed ethics in higher learning curricula through its power to appeal to students’ hearts and minds. Through storytelling, ethics lessons that emerged throughout history can be taught in a memorable way and raise empathetic skills, while fictional stories may allow students to identify with the characters and contemplate possible ethical outcomes of a decision in a safe manner. We provide an overview of various fictional and nonfictional forms that can be used to improve students’ motivation and equip them with some innovative tools that can support ethical decision-making, including science fiction, digital storytelling, Virtual Reality, and videogames. In addition, we recommend that ethics training via storytelling should be embedded as early as possible as integrated nodes into existing STEM curricula to stimulate empathy and critical thinking skills in students and to supplement existing rule-based education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

eBook: USD 16.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Hardcover Book: USD 129.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

1.
https://www.plurality-university.org/projects/narratopias

References

Adashi, Eli Y., LeRoy B. Walters, and Jerry A. Menikoff. 2018. The Belmont report at 40: Reckoning with time. American Journal of Public Health. 108 (100): 1345–1348. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304580.
Article Google Scholar
Addison, R. 1995. Detour: Brain deconstruction ahead. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 15 (2): 14–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.364998.
Article Google Scholar
Aldous, Peter. 2006. Illness simulators boost medical empathy. New Scientist. 2546. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19025466-400-illness-simulators-boost-medical-empathy/. Accessed 16 Jan 2023.
Annas, Julia. 2002. Moral knowledge as practical knowledge. Social Philosophy and Policy 18 (2): 236–256. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500002971.
Article Google Scholar
Auger, James. 2013. Speculative design: Crafting the speculation. Digital Creativity 24 (1): 11–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.767276.
Article Google Scholar
Bleecker, Julian. 2022. Design fiction. In Machine learning and the city, 561–578. Hoboken: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119815075.ch47.
Chapter Google Scholar
BMJ. 1996. The Nuremberg code (1947) and declaration of Helsinki (1964). British Medical Journal. 313 (7070): 1448. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7070.1448.
Article Google Scholar
Briggle, Adam, and Carl Mitcham. 2012. Ethics and science: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Book Google Scholar
Broad, William J., and Nicholas Wade. 1982. Betrayers of the truth: Fraud and deceit in the halls of science. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Google Scholar
Burton, Emanuelle, J. Goldsmith, and Nicholas Mattei. 2018. How to teach computer ethics through science fiction. Communications of the ACM. 61 (8): 54–64.
Article Google Scholar
Byrne, Emmet. 2019. Too much truth: A conversation with David Kirby. In Designs for different futures, 160–164. Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Byrne, Emmet, and Susannah Schouweiler. 2015. The future never gets old. On Julian Bleecker. In Made up: Design’s fictions, 28–33. Actar Art Center Graduate Press.
Google Scholar
Callahan, Daniel. 1980. Goals in the teaching of ethics. In Ethics teaching in higher education, 61–80. Boston: Springer.
Chapter Google Scholar
Cavazza, Marc, Jean-Luc Lugrin, David Pizzi, and Fred Charles. 2007. Madame Bovary on the Holodeck: Immersive interactive storytelling. In ACM Multimedia, 651–660. https://doi.org/10.1145/1291233.1291387.
Chapter Google Scholar
Chalfen, R. 2012. Differentiating practices of participatory visual media production. In Margolis: The Sage handbook of visual research methods, 186–200. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268278.N10.
Chapter Google Scholar
Currie, Gregory. 2020. Imagining and knowing: The shape of fiction. Vol. 81, 142–147. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzaa081.
Book Google Scholar
Davis, Erik. 2004. TechGnosis. New York: Harmony Books.
Google Scholar
de Jager, Adele, Andrea Fogarty, Anna Tewson, Caroline Lenette, Katherine Boydell, and M. 2017. Digital storytelling in research: A systematic review. The Qualitative Report 22 (10): 2548–2582. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol22/iss10/3?utm_source=nsuworks.nova.edu%2Ftqr%2Fvol22%2Fiss10%2F3&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages. Accessed 16 Jan 2023.
Google Scholar
Delgado, Ana, Kjetil Rommetveit, Miquel Barceló, and Louis Lemkow. 2012. Imagining high-tech bodies: Science fiction and the ethics of enhancement. Science Communication 34 (2): 200–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547011408928.
Article Google Scholar
Dunne, Anthony, and Fiona Raby. 2013. Speculative everything: Design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT press.
Google Scholar
Durfee, Tim. 2015. Aspirants to reality. Possible essays on the made up. In Made up: Design’s fictions, 10–15. Los Angeles: Actar Art Center Graduate Press. https://www.timdurfee.com/Aspirants-to-Reality-Possible-Essays-on-the-Made-Up. Accessed 16 Jan 2023.
Google Scholar
Ethics4EU. 2022. Welcome to our open educational resources platform! http://ethics4eu.eu/. Accessed 16 Jan 2023.
Fairbairn, Gavin. 2002. Ethics, empathy, and storytelling in professional development. Learning in Health and Social Care. 1 (1): 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1473-6861.2002.00004.x.
Article Google Scholar
Fairweather, Jack. 2006. ‘Ethical’ computer games take on shoot’em-up classics. The Daily Telegraph.. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1522642/Ethical-computer-games-take-on-shoot-em-up-classics.html. Accessed 16 Jan 2023.
Fiesler, Casey. 2021. Innovating like an optimist, preparing like a pessimist: Ethical speculation and the legal imagination. Colorado Technology Law Journal 19 (1): 1–18. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3779036. Accessed 16 Jan 2023.
Google Scholar
Fiesler, Casey, Natalie Garrett, and Nathan Beard. 2020. What do we teach when we teach tech ethics? A syllabi analysis. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM technical symposium on computer science education, 289–295. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366825.
Chapter Google Scholar
Foster-Fishman, Pennie, Branda Nowell, Zermarie Deacon, M. Angela Nievar, and Peggy McCann. 2005. Using methods that matter: The impact of reflection, dialogue, and voice. American Journal of Community Psychology 36 (3–4): 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-005-8626-y.
Article Google Scholar
Global Bioethics Initiative. 2021. Summer school 2021. https://globalbioethics.org/?s=summer+school. Accessed 29 July 2021.
Goldstein, Melissa M. 2017. Revising the common rule: Ethics, scientific advancement, and public policy in conflict. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 45: 452–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110517737546.
Article Google Scholar
Griffin, Susan. 1993. A chorus of stones: The private life of war. New York: Anchor.
Google Scholar
Grosz, Barbara J., David Gray Grant, Kate Vredenburgh, Jeff Behrends, Lily Hu, Alison Simmons, and Jim Waldo. 2019. Embedded EthiCS: Integrating ethics across CS education. Communications of the ACM. 62 (8): 54–61. https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2019/8/238345-embedded-ethics/abstract. Accessed 16 Jan 2023.
Article Google Scholar
Gubrium, Aline. 2009. Digital storytelling: An emergent method for health promotion research and practice. Health Promotion Practice. 10 (2): 186–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839909332600.
Article Google Scholar
Hansen, Kathryn Strong. 2021. Optimistic fiction as a tool for ethical reflection in STEM. Journal of Academic Ethics. 19 (3): 425–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09405-5.
Article Google Scholar
Hedgecoe, Adam. 2009. A ‘form of practical machinery’: The origins of research ethics committees in the UK, 1967–1972. Medical History 53 (3): 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1017/2Fs0025727300000211.
Article Google Scholar
Human Genome Project. 1990. National Human Genome Research Institute. https://www.genome.gov/human-genome-project. Accessed 22 July 2022.
International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research. 2013. Position paper 1: What is participatory health research? http://www.icphr.org/uploads/2/0/3/9/20399575/ichpr_position_paper_1_defintion_-_version_may_2013.pdf. Accessed 23 Aug 2021.
Lambert, Joe. 2013. Digital storytelling: Capturing lives, creating community. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203102329.
Book Google Scholar
Langfelder, Elinor J., and Eric T. Juengst. 1993. Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) program, National center for human genome research, National Institutes of Health. Politics and the Life Sciences 12 (2): 273–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0730938400024217.
Article Google Scholar
MacEntee, Katie, Casey Burkholder, and Joshua Schwab-Cartas. 2016. What’s a Cellphilm? Integrating mobile phone technology into participatory visual research and activism: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-573-9.
Book Google Scholar
Macer, Darryl R. 1991. New creations? The Hastings Center Report 21 (1): 32–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/3563344.
Article Google Scholar
Mahmoudi, Ayoub, Ali Khushnood, and Abdolrazagh Babaei. 2014. Paulo Freire critical pedagogy and its implications in curriculum planning. Journal of Education and Practice. 5 (14): 86–92. https://www.academia.edu/87360600/Paulo_Freire_Critical_Pedagogy_and_its_Implications_in_Curriculum_Planning. Accessed 16 Jan 2023.
Google Scholar
Manney, P.J. 2008. Empathy in the time of technology: How storytelling is the key to empathy. Journal of Evolution and Technology 19 (1): 51–61. https://jetpress.org/v19/manney.htm. Accessed 16 Jan. 2023.
Google Scholar
Maples-Keller, Jessica, Brian Bunnell, and E., Kim, Sae-Jin., Rothbaum, Barbara. 2017. The use of virtual reality technology in the treatment of anxiety and other psychiatric disorders. Harvard review of psychiatry. 25 (3): 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1097/hrp.0000000000000138.
Article Google Scholar
Markkula Center for Applied Ethics. 2009. Making an ethical decision. https://www.scu.edu/media/ethics-center/resources/making.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2021.
Matthews, Nicole, and Naomi Sunderland. 2017. Digital storytelling in health and social policy. Routledge.
Book Google Scholar
Maynard, Andrew. 2018. Films from the future: The technology and morality of Sci-Fi movies. Coral Gables: Mango Media Inc.
Google Scholar
McDaniel, Rudy, and Stephen M. Fiore. 2010. Applied ethics game design: Some practical guidelines in ethics and game design: Teaching values through play, Information Science Reference. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-845-6.ch015.
Book Google Scholar
National Institutes of Health. 1989. NIH guide for grants and contracts. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/historical/1989_12_22_Vol_18_No_45.pdf. Accessed 22 July 2021.
National Research Council and National Academy of Engineering. 2014. Emerging and readily available technologies and national security a framework for addressing ethical, legal, and societal issues. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Google Scholar
Neile, Caren Schnur. 2009. Storytelling and social change: Introduction to the special issue. Storytelling, Self, Society. 5 (2): 69–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15505340902828068.
Article Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 1990. Love’s knowledge, 3. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Picoult, Jody. 2008. My sister’s keeper. Paw Prints.
Google Scholar
Pomidor, Bill, and Alice K. Pomidor. 2006. Essay: With great power… the relevance of science fiction to the practice and progress of medicine. The Lancet. 368: S13–S14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69908-X.
Article Google Scholar
Reason, Peter. 1988. Storytelling as inquiry. In Human inquiry in action. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Rossi, Arianna, Régis Chatellier, Stefano Leucci, Rossana Ducato, and Estelle Hary. 2022. What if data protection embraced foresight and speculative design? DRS2022: Bilbao. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2022.681.
Ryan, Zoë. 2019. The design imagination. In Designs for different futures, 41–47. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Saffo, Paul. 2005. Farewell information, it’s the media age. http://www.saffo.com/essays/essay_farewellinfo.pdf. Accessed 23 Aug 2021.
Sandars, John, and Christopher Murray. 2009. Digital storytelling for reflection in undergraduate medical education: A pilot study. Education for Primary Care. 20: 441–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2009.11493832.
Article Google Scholar
Scott, Shannon, Pamela Brett-MacLean, Mandy Archibald, and Lisa Hartling. 2013. Protocol for a systematic review of the use of narrative storytelling and visual-arts-based approaches as knowledge translation tools in healthcare. Systematic Reviews. 2: 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-19.
Article Google Scholar
Skloot, Rebecca. 2010. The immortal life of Henrietta lacks. Crown: US.
Google Scholar
Smiley, Jane. 2006. Thirteen ways of looking at the novel. Germany: Anchor.
Google Scholar
Steneck, Nicholas, and Ruth Bulger. 2007. The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine. 82 (9): 829–834. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e31812f7d4d.
Article Google Scholar
Stephens, Greg J., Lauren J. Silbert, and Uri Hasson. 2010. Speaker–listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. PNAS 107 (32): 14425–14430. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1008662107.
Article Google Scholar
Sterling, Bruce. 2009. Cover story design fiction. Interactions 16 (3): 20–24. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/1516016. Accessed 16 Jan 2023.
Article Google Scholar
Suzuki, W.A., M.I. Feliú-Mójer, U. Hasson, R. Yehuda, and J.M. Zarate. 2018. Dialogues: The science and power of storytelling. The Journal of Neuroscience. 38 (44): 9468–9470. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1942-18.2018.
Article Google Scholar
Swazey, Judith P., and Stephanie Bird. 1997. Teaching and learning research ethics, Research ethics: A reader. Dartmouth: University Press of New England.
Google Scholar
Tharp, Bruce M., and Stephanie M. Tharp. 2019. Discursive design: Critical, speculative, and alternative things. MIT Press.
Book Google Scholar
Thompson, Clive. 2006. Saving the world, one video game at a time. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/23/arts/23thom.html. Accessed 24 Aug 2021.
Thornley, Clare, Shane McLoughlin, and Sinead Murnane. 2021. ‘At the round earth’s imagined corners’: The power of Science Fiction to enrich ethical knowledge creation for responsible innovation. In Proceedings of 22nd European conference on knowledge management, ECKM 2021. https://doi.org/10.34190/EKM.21.059.
Chapter Google Scholar
Vermeule, Blakey. 2011. Why do we care about literary characters? Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar
Webster’s New Universal Unabridged Dictionary. 1979. Empathy. 2nd ed.
Google Scholar
Yang, Ya-Ting C., and Wan-Chi I. Wu. 2012. Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-long experimental study. Computers and Education. 59 (2): 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.012.
Article Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

SnT Interdisciplinary Center for Security, Reliability and Trust, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
Marietjie Botes & Arianna Rossi
College of Law, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa
Marietjie Botes

Authors

Marietjie Botes
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Arianna Rossi
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marietjie Botes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA
Elisabeth Hildt
Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA
Kelly Laas
Department of Biomedical Engineering, AET, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
Eric M. Brey
Savannah College of Art and Design, Savannah, GA, USA
Christine Z. Miller

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Botes, M., Rossi, A. (2024). At the Verge of ‘Is’ and ‘Could Be’: Storytelling as Medium to Develop Critical Ethical Skills. In: Hildt, E., Laas, K., Brey, E.M., Miller, C.Z. (eds) Building Inclusive Ethical Cultures in STEM. The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, vol 42. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51560-6_17

Download citation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51560-6_17
Published: 23 February 2024
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-51559-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-51560-6
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics