Conclusion
Introducing his paper, Slezak (p. 428) proposes “to examine Botha's criticisms in detail with a view to demonstrating that they are without foundation and are based on the most fundamental misunderstandings”. Concluding his paper, Slezak (p. 439) expresses the hope that he has shown “that the conceptions on which these criticisms rest are so seriously flawed as to make it unprofitable to attempt to unravel the rest of his analysis”. These formulations, by all standards, represent rather strong rhetoric. But, as the preceding paragraphs have shown, Slezak's discussion sadly lacks the relevant and accurate analyses needed to give substance to his rhetoric.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Bahcall, John N., and Raymond Davis, Jr.: 1976, ‘Solar neutrinos: a scientific puzzle’, Science 191, 264–267.
Botha, Rudolf P.: 1979, ‘External evidence in the validation of mentalistic theories: A Chomskyan paradox’, Lingua 48, 299–328.
Botha, Rudolf P.: 1980, ‘Methodological bases of a progressive mentalism’, Synthese 44, 1–112.
Botha, Rudolf P.: 1982, ‘On how not to argue about Chomskyan mentalism’, Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 8, 1–50.
Bunge, Mario: 1980, The Mind-Body Problem. A Psychobiological Approach, Pergamon Press, Oxford, etc.
Butterworth, B.: 1980, ‘Some constraints on models of language production’, in Butterworth (ed.), pp. 423–459.
Butterworth, B. (ed.): 1980, Language Production, Volume 1, Speech and Talk, Academic Press, London, etc.
Caplan, David: 1980, Biological Studies of Mental Processes, MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.) and London.
Chandor, A., J. Graham, and R. Williamson: 1970, A Dictionary of Computers, Penguin Books, Baltimore.
Chomsky, Noam: 1976, ‘On the biological basis of language capacities’, in Rieber (ed.), pp. 1–24. Also published as Chapter 5 in Chomsky 1980.
Chomsky, Noam: 1978, ‘A theory of core grammar’, Glot 1, 7–26.
Chomsky, Noam: 1980, Rules and Representations, Columbia University Press, New York.
Colby, Kenneth Mark: 1978, ‘Mind models: an overview of current work’, Mathematical Biosciences 39, 159–185.
Cooper, William E., and Edward C. T. Walker (eds.): 1979, Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies Presented to Merrill Garrett, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J.
Dresher, B. Elan, and Norbert Hornstein: 1976, ‘On some supposed contributions of artificial intelligence to the study of language’, Cognition 4, 321–398.
Grobstein, Paul, and Dao Liang Chow: 1975, ‘Receptive field development and individual experience’, Science 190, 352–358.
Katz, Jerrold J.: 1977, ‘The real status of semantic representations’, Linguistic Inquiry 8, 559–584.
Kean, Mary-Louise: 1980, ‘Grammatical representations and the description of language processing’, in Caplan (ed.), pp. 239–268.
Marr, D.: 1977, ‘Artificial intelligence — a personal view’, Artificial Intelligence 9, 37–48.
Marshall, John C.: 1980, ‘On the biology of language acquisition’, in Caplan (ed.), pp. 106–148.
Moor, James H.: 1978, ‘Three myths of computer science’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29, 213–222.
Moravcsik, Edith A., and Jessica R. Wirth (eds.): 1980, Current Approaches to Syntax (= Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 13), Academic Press, New York, etc.
Pylyshyn, Zenon W.: 1972, ‘Competence and psychological reality’, American Psychologist 27, 546–552.
Pylyshyn, Zenon W.: 1973, ‘The role of competence theories in cognitive psychology’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2, 21–50.
Rieber, R. W. (ed.): 1976, The Neuropsychology of Language. Essays in Honor of Eric Lenneberg, Plenum Press, New York and London.
Shank, R. C.: 1978, ‘What makes something “ad hoc”?’, Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing 2, 8–13.
Slezak, Peter: 1981, ‘Language and psychological reality: A discussion of Rudolf Botha's study’, Synthese 49, 427–440.
Steinberg, Danny D.: 1975, ‘Chomsky: from formalism to mentalism and psychological unvalidity’, Glossa 9, 218–252.
Stockwell, Robert P.: 1980, ‘Summation and assessment of theories’, in Moravcsik and Wirth (eds.), pp. 353–381
Valian, Virginia: 1979, ‘The wherefores and therefores of the competence-performance distinction’, in Cooper and Walker (eds.), pp. 1–26
Young, J. Z.: 1971, An Introduction to the Study of Man, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I would like to thank Marina Savini and Thereza Botha for suggestions which led to improvements in the formulation of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Botha, R.P. On Chomskyan mentalism: A reply to Peter Slezak. Synthese 53, 123–141 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00500113
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00500113