Abstract
This essay will argue for ethical procedures governing criminal profiling. A model based upon psychological/behavioral data, witness data, and forensic profiling data is sketched out. This model fits the legitimate uses of criminal profiling as an investigation procedure. Racial profiling as a primary sorting factor does not fit the preferred model and has significant downsides and so is rejected as a primary sorting mechanism in criminal investigation procedure.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Of course there are other socially constructed racial stereotypes as well—such as the rabid Islamic extremist. As will be shown later in this essay such stereotypes have vague connection to some empirical data, but the conclusions are not supported by inductive logic.
Of course the ideal of the criminal profiler who uses physical evidence and witnesses testimony (when available) to construct a psychological/behavioral model of the perpetrator first appeared in fiction through characters such as Sherlock Holmes and Hercule Poirot. Sometimes real life follows art.
For the sake of completeness, let me report that any coercion on Malvo was held to be within his power reasonably to withstand. Thus, his sentence was not affected.
It should be noted here that the sort of profiling described by this author is general profiling—using statistics to create type analysis. Instead, I have argued for an individualistic-style, token, profiling.
This point links with my own examinations of a couple of actual cases in Boylan (2008).
Jeffrey Reiman (1996) discusses automatic procedures that limit police discretion (and thereby support the liberty of all). A Batson style test with reasonable procedures that are developed over time would be in the spirit of Reiman’s argument.
There is a brief discussion of the pros and cons of a form of the exclusionary ruling for evidence obtained via racial profiling by David Wasserman (1996).
References
Alison, Laurence J. 2005. The forensic psychologist’s casebook: Psychological profiling and criminal investigation. Cullumpton: Willan.
Birzer, Michael L., and Gwynne Harris Birzer. 2006. Race matters: A critical look at racial profiling, it’s a matter for the courts. Journal of Criminal Justice 34: 643–651.
Boylan, Michael. 2004. A just society. Lanham, MD and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
Boylan, Michael. 2007. Genetic profiling: Ethical constraints upon criminal investigation procedures. Politics and Ethics Review 3: 236–252.
Boylan, Michael 2008. Racial profiling and genetic privacy in criminal investigation procedures. Center for American Progress.
Brussel, James S. 1968. Casebook of a crime psychiatrist. New York: Grove Press.
Clifford, William Kingdom (1901). The ethics of belief. In Lectures and essays, Vol 2, 163–205. London: Macmillan & Co.
Douglas, J.E., R.K. Ressler, A.W. Burgess, and C.R. Hartman 1986. Criminal profiling from crime scene analysis. Behavioral Sciences and Law 401–421.
Douglas, J.E., A.W. Burgess, A.G. Burgess, and R.K. Ressler. 1992. Crime classification manual. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.
Douglas, J.E., and C. Munn. 1992. Violent crime scene analysis: Modus operandi, signature, and staging. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin I: 1–10.
Engel, R.S., and J.M. Calnon. 2004. Examining the effects of drivers’ characteristics during traffic stops with police: Results from a national survey. Justice Quarterly 21: 49–90.
Entman, R.M. 1990. Modern racism and the images of blacks in local television news. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 7: 332–345.
Grimland, Meytal, Alan Apter, and Ad. Kerkhof. 2006. The phenomenon of suicide bombing: A review of psychological and nonpsycholotical factors. Crisis 27: 107–118.
Gumbhir, Vikas K. 2007. But is it racial profiling? New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC.
Harcourt, Bernard E. 2007. Against prediction: Profiling. Policing, and Punishing in an Actuarial Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hazelwood, R., and J.I. Warren. 2003. Linkage analysis: Modus operandi, ritual, and signature in serial sexual crime. Aggression and Violent Behavior 8: 587–598.
Katz, J. (2000, February 15). A nation of too many prisoners?. Los Angeles Times A-1.
Kennedy, Randall. 1997. Race, crime, and the law. New York: Vintage.
Kocsis, Richard N. 2003a. Criminal psychological profiling: Validities and abilities? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 47: 126–144.
Kocsis, Richard N. 2003b. An empirical assessment of content in criminal psychological profiles. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 47: 38–47.
Kocsis, Richard N. 2004. Psychological profiling of serial arson offenses an assessment of skills and accuracy. Criminal Justice and Behavior 31: 341–361.
Kocsis, Richard N. 2006. Criminal profiling. Totowa: Humana Press.
McCue, Colleen. 2007. Data mining and predictive analysis. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Napier, M.R., and K.P. Baker. 2005. Criminal personality profiling. In Forensic science: An introduction to scientific and investigative techniques, 2nd edn., ed. S.H. James, and J.J. Nordby, 615–634. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Newton, David E. 2008. DNA evidence and forensic science. New York: Facts on File.
Palermo, George B., and Richard N. Kocsis. 2005. Offender profiling: An introduction to the sociopsychological analysis of violent crime. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas Publishers, Ltd.
Palmer-Fernández, Gabriel. 2011. Cosmopolitan revisions of just war theory. In Morality and global justice, ed. Michael. Boylan. Boulder: Westview.
Reiman, Jeffrey. 1996. Is police discretion justified in a free society? In Handled with discretion: Ethical issues in police decision making, ed. John. Kleinig, 71–84. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Rossmo, D.K. 2000. Geographic profiling. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Schlesinger, Louis B. 2009. Psychological profiling: Investigative implications from crime scene analysis. The Journal of Psychiatry and Law 37: 73–84.
Schmidt, E.L., P.A. Langan, and M.R. Durose. 2002. Characteristics of drivers stopped by police. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Statistics.
Sniderman, P., and T. Piazza. 1993. The scar of race. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Soares, Christine (May 2010). Portrait in DNA. Scientific American 302: 14–15.
Snook, Brent, Richard M. Cullen, Craig Bennell, Paul J. Taylor, and Paul Gendreau. 2010. The criminal profiling illusion: What’s behind the smoke and mirrors? Criminal Justice and Behavior 35: 1257–1276.
Torres, Angela N., Marcus T. Boccaccini, and Holly A. Miller. 2006. Perceptions of the validity and utility of criminal profiling among forensic psychologists and psychiatrists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 37: 51–58.
US Department of Justice (2004) Crime in the United States, 2002. from http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_02/html/web/arrested/04-table43.html Retrieved Feb 14, 2007.
Wasserman, David. 1996. Racial generalizations and police discretion. In Handled with discretion: Ethical issues in police decision making, ed. Kleinig. John, 115–130. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Welch, Kelly. 2007. Black criminal stereotypes and racial profiling. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 23.3: 276–288.
Wise, T. 2005. Racial profiling and its apologists. In Annual editions, criminal justice, ed. J.L. Victor, and J. Naughton, 100–103. Dubuque: McGraw-Hill/Dushkin.
Withrow, B.L. 2002. The Wichita stop study. Wichita: Wichita State University, Midwest Criminal Justice Institute.
Wolf, Barbara C., and Wendy A. Lavezzi. 2007. Paths to destruction: The lives and crimes of two serial killers. Journal of Forensic Science 52: 199–203.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Greg McCrary, former field agent for the FBI, Michael Bolton, criminologist and former police detective, and Mary Lindahl, a high profile forensic psychologist for their real world insights that have greatly improved my essay. All errors, of course, are my own.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boylan, M. Ethical Profiling. J Ethics 15, 131–145 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-010-9092-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-010-9092-9