Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ethical Profiling

  • Published:
The Journal of Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay will argue for ethical procedures governing criminal profiling. A model based upon psychological/behavioral data, witness data, and forensic profiling data is sketched out. This model fits the legitimate uses of criminal profiling as an investigation procedure. Racial profiling as a primary sorting factor does not fit the preferred model and has significant downsides and so is rejected as a primary sorting mechanism in criminal investigation procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Of course there are other socially constructed racial stereotypes as well—such as the rabid Islamic extremist. As will be shown later in this essay such stereotypes have vague connection to some empirical data, but the conclusions are not supported by inductive logic.

  2. Of course the ideal of the criminal profiler who uses physical evidence and witnesses testimony (when available) to construct a psychological/behavioral model of the perpetrator first appeared in fiction through characters such as Sherlock Holmes and Hercule Poirot. Sometimes real life follows art.

  3. cf. also to Schlesinger (2009), Kocsis (2003a, b, 2006), and Rossmo (2000).

  4. For the sake of completeness, let me report that any coercion on Malvo was held to be within his power reasonably to withstand. Thus, his sentence was not affected.

  5. It should be noted here that the sort of profiling described by this author is general profiling—using statistics to create type analysis. Instead, I have argued for an individualistic-style, token, profiling.

  6. This point links with my own examinations of a couple of actual cases in Boylan (2008).

  7. Jeffrey Reiman (1996) discusses automatic procedures that limit police discretion (and thereby support the liberty of all). A Batson style test with reasonable procedures that are developed over time would be in the spirit of Reiman’s argument.

  8. There is a brief discussion of the pros and cons of a form of the exclusionary ruling for evidence obtained via racial profiling by David Wasserman (1996).

References

  • Alison, Laurence J. 2005. The forensic psychologist’s casebook: Psychological profiling and criminal investigation. Cullumpton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birzer, Michael L., and Gwynne Harris Birzer. 2006. Race matters: A critical look at racial profiling, it’s a matter for the courts. Journal of Criminal Justice 34: 643–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boylan, Michael. 2004. A just society. Lanham, MD and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.

  • Boylan, Michael. 2007. Genetic profiling: Ethical constraints upon criminal investigation procedures. Politics and Ethics Review 3: 236–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boylan, Michael 2008. Racial profiling and genetic privacy in criminal investigation procedures. Center for American Progress.

  • Brussel, James S. 1968. Casebook of a crime psychiatrist. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, William Kingdom (1901). The ethics of belief. In Lectures and essays, Vol 2, 163–205. London: Macmillan & Co.

  • Douglas, J.E., R.K. Ressler, A.W. Burgess, and C.R. Hartman 1986. Criminal profiling from crime scene analysis. Behavioral Sciences and Law 401–421.

  • Douglas, J.E., A.W. Burgess, A.G. Burgess, and R.K. Ressler. 1992. Crime classification manual. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J.E., and C. Munn. 1992. Violent crime scene analysis: Modus operandi, signature, and staging. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin I: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, R.S., and J.M. Calnon. 2004. Examining the effects of drivers’ characteristics during traffic stops with police: Results from a national survey. Justice Quarterly 21: 49–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entman, R.M. 1990. Modern racism and the images of blacks in local television news. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 7: 332–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimland, Meytal, Alan Apter, and Ad. Kerkhof. 2006. The phenomenon of suicide bombing: A review of psychological and nonpsycholotical factors. Crisis 27: 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumbhir, Vikas K. 2007. But is it racial profiling? New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, Bernard E. 2007. Against prediction: Profiling. Policing, and Punishing in an Actuarial Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazelwood, R., and J.I. Warren. 2003. Linkage analysis: Modus operandi, ritual, and signature in serial sexual crime. Aggression and Violent Behavior 8: 587–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (2000, February 15). A nation of too many prisoners?. Los Angeles Times A-1.

  • Kennedy, Randall. 1997. Race, crime, and the law. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kocsis, Richard N. 2003a. Criminal psychological profiling: Validities and abilities? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 47: 126–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocsis, Richard N. 2003b. An empirical assessment of content in criminal psychological profiles. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 47: 38–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kocsis, Richard N. 2004. Psychological profiling of serial arson offenses an assessment of skills and accuracy. Criminal Justice and Behavior 31: 341–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocsis, Richard N. 2006. Criminal profiling. Totowa: Humana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCue, Colleen. 2007. Data mining and predictive analysis. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napier, M.R., and K.P. Baker. 2005. Criminal personality profiling. In Forensic science: An introduction to scientific and investigative techniques, 2nd edn., ed. S.H. James, and J.J. Nordby, 615–634. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, David E. 2008. DNA evidence and forensic science. New York: Facts on File.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palermo, George B., and Richard N. Kocsis. 2005. Offender profiling: An introduction to the sociopsychological analysis of violent crime. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas Publishers, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer-Fernández, Gabriel. 2011. Cosmopolitan revisions of just war theory. In Morality and global justice, ed. Michael. Boylan. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiman, Jeffrey. 1996. Is police discretion justified in a free society? In Handled with discretion: Ethical issues in police decision making, ed. John. Kleinig, 71–84. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossmo, D.K. 2000. Geographic profiling. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, Louis B. 2009. Psychological profiling: Investigative implications from crime scene analysis. The Journal of Psychiatry and Law 37: 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, E.L., P.A. Langan, and M.R. Durose. 2002. Characteristics of drivers stopped by police. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniderman, P., and T. Piazza. 1993. The scar of race. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soares, Christine (May 2010). Portrait in DNA. Scientific American 302: 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snook, Brent, Richard M. Cullen, Craig Bennell, Paul J. Taylor, and Paul Gendreau. 2010. The criminal profiling illusion: What’s behind the smoke and mirrors? Criminal Justice and Behavior 35: 1257–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, Angela N., Marcus T. Boccaccini, and Holly A. Miller. 2006. Perceptions of the validity and utility of criminal profiling among forensic psychologists and psychiatrists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 37: 51–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Justice (2004) Crime in the United States, 2002. from http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_02/html/web/arrested/04-table43.html Retrieved Feb 14, 2007.

  • Wasserman, David. 1996. Racial generalizations and police discretion. In Handled with discretion: Ethical issues in police decision making, ed. Kleinig. John, 115–130. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, Kelly. 2007. Black criminal stereotypes and racial profiling. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 23.3: 276–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise, T. 2005. Racial profiling and its apologists. In Annual editions, criminal justice, ed. J.L. Victor, and J. Naughton, 100–103. Dubuque: McGraw-Hill/Dushkin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Withrow, B.L. 2002. The Wichita stop study. Wichita: Wichita State University, Midwest Criminal Justice Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Barbara C., and Wendy A. Lavezzi. 2007. Paths to destruction: The lives and crimes of two serial killers. Journal of Forensic Science 52: 199–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Greg McCrary, former field agent for the FBI, Michael Bolton, criminologist and former police detective, and Mary Lindahl, a high profile forensic psychologist for their real world insights that have greatly improved my essay. All errors, of course, are my own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Boylan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boylan, M. Ethical Profiling. J Ethics 15, 131–145 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-010-9092-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-010-9092-9

Keywords

Navigation