Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Humane slaughter of poultry: The case against the use of electrical stunning devices

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Is the use of electrical stunners adequately discharging our moral obligations with respect to the humane slaughter of poultry? Below, three separate lines of investigation show that we cannot give an unequivocal answer to this question. First, five potentially humane methods of poultry slaughter are examined. Electrical stunning is found to be an acceptable method of rendering birds unconscious before slaughter. However, we lack sufficient evidence to claim that it is the most humane method currently available. Second, surveys of poultry processing plants show that, with alarming frequency, a proper stun is not achieved. An investigation of the complexity of the electrical stun process shows the difficulties involved and suggests that under many on-the-floor slaughterhouse conditions, consistently proper stunning is likely to remain unachievable. Finally, the call to overcome inconsistent stun results by increasing current flow to levels that electrocute birds is investigated. Controversy surrounding the impact of electrocution on carcass quality and operator safety will continue to cause resistance to the adoption of this method of poultry slaughter.

The conclusion offers four recommendations that follow from the cumulative results of these investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Veterinary Medical Association Panel on Euthanasia. 1978. Report of the AVMA Panel on Euthanasia.Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 173:59–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, D. K. and D. K. Delany. 1987a. Head-to-body Electrical Stunning. In European Conference Group on the Protection of Animals.Pre-slaughter Stunning of Food Animals. Horsham, Sussex, England.

  • Blackmore, D. K. and D. K. Delany, and M. W. Delany. 1987b. Determination of Impaired Brain Function in Animals in the Abattoir. In European Conference Group on the Protection of Animals,Pre-slaughter Stunning of Food Animals, Horsham, Susses, England.

  • Dickens, J. A. and C. E. Lyon 1993. Effect of Two Stunning Voltages on Blood Loss and Objective Texture of Meat Deboned at Various Post-morterm Times.Poultry Science 72:589–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Conference Group on the Protection of Animals. 1987.Pre-slaughter Stunning of Food Animals, Horsham, Sussex, England.

  • Farm Animal Welfare Council. 1982.Report on the Welfare of Poultry at the Time of Slaughter. Surbiton, Surrey, England.

  • Fox, M. W. and L. D. Mickley. (Eds.) 1985.Advances in Animal Welfare. Boston, MA: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlis, L. M. 1986. An Up-to-date Assessment of the Jewish Method of Slaughter, in UFAW,Humane Slaughter of Animals for Food Symposium. Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, England.

  • Grandin, T. 1985. Cardiac Arrest Stunning in Livestock and Poultry InAdvances in Animal Welfare, edited by M. W. Fox and L. D. Mickley. Boston, MA: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, N. G. 1986. The Physiology of Electrical Stunning and Slaughter. In UFAW,Humane Slaughter of Animals for Food Symposium. Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, England.

  • Gregory, N. G. 1987. Determination of Impaired Brain Function of Animals in the Laboratory, in European Conference Group on the Protection,Pre-slaughter Stunning of Food Animals, Horsham, Sussex, England.

  • and S. B. Wotton. 1986. Effect of Slaughter on the Spontaneous and Evoked Activity of the Brain.British Poultry Science 27:195–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greogry, N. G. and S. B. Wotton 1987. Poultry Stunning and Slaughter. In European Conference Group on the Protection of Animals,Pre-slaughter Stunning of Food Animals, Horsham, Sussex, England.

  • 1990a. Effect of Stunning on Spontaneous Physical Activity and Evoked Activity in the Brain.British Poultry Science 31:215–220

    Google Scholar 

  • 1990b. Effect of Electrical Stunning on Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Turkey's Brain.British Veterinary Journal 147:270–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. E. and T. A. Carter. 1977. Broiler Blood Losses with Manual and Mechanical Killers. Poultry Science 56:1827–1831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, G. B. S. 1984. The Slaughter of Broiler Chickens. World'sPoultry Science Journal 40:151–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holson, R. R. 1992. Euthanasia by Decapitation: Evidence that this Technique Produces Prompt, Painless Unconsciousness in Laboratory Rodents.Neurotoxicology and Teratology 14:253–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurnik, F. and H. Lehman. 1982. Unnecessary Suffering: Definition and Evidence.International Journal for the Study of Animal Suffering 3:131–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallweit, E., F. Ellendorf, C. Daly, and D. Smidt. 1987. Physiological Responses of Slaughter with and Without Stunning. In European Conference Group on the Protection of Animals,Pre-slaughter Stunning of Food Animals, Horsham, Sussex, England.

  • Katme, A. M. 1986. An Up-to-date Assessment of the Moslem Method of Slaughter, in UFAW,Humane Slaughter of Animals for Food Symposium, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, England.

  • Kettlewell, P. J. 1986. Recent Developments in the Slaughter of Poultry, in UFAW,Humane Slaughter of Animals for Food Symposium, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, England.

  • Kettlewell, P. J. and R. N. Hallworth. 1990. Electrical Stunning of Chickens.Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 47:139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuenzel, W. J. and J. H. Walther. 1978. Heart Beat, Blood Pressure, and Brain Waves of Broilers as Affected by Electrical Stunning and Bleed-out.Poultry Science 57:655–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambooy, E. 1986. Recent Developments in Electrical Stunning. In UFAW,Humane Slaughter of Animals for food Symposium, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, England.

  • Meat Inspection Act. S.C., 1985 c. 17 Meat Inspection Regulations, 1990, Ottawa, ON: Agriculture Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meat Inspection Act (Ontario), REvised Statutes of Ontario, 1990, Toronto, ON: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food.

  • Mikeska, J. A. and W. R. Klemm 1975. EEG Evaluation of Humaneness of Asphyxia and Decapitation Euthanasia of the Laboratory Rat.Laboratory Animal Science 25:175–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan Raj, A. B. 1993. Stunning Procedures. InFourth European Poultry Welfare Symposium, UFAW, edited by C. J. Savory and B. O. Hughes. Potters Bar, U.K., pp. 230–236.

  • Ontario Hydro Electrical Safety Code, 20th Edition, based onCanadian Safety Association Standard C22.1, 1990. Available through Ontario Hydro offices.

  • Recommended Code of Practice for Handling Chickens from Hatchery to Slaughterhouse. 1983. Ottawa, ON: Agriculture Canada, Publication 1757E.

  • Thomson, J. E., C. E. Lyon, D. Hamm, and J. A. Dickens. 1986. Effects of Electrical Stunning and Hot Deboning on Broiler Breast Meat Quality.Poultry Science 65:1715–1719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Universities Federation for Animal Welfare. 1971.Humane Killing and Slaughter Technicians Symposium. Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, England.

  • Universities Federation for Animal Welfare. 1986.Humane Slaughter of Animals for Food Symposium. Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, England.

  • Wooley, S. C., F. J. W. Borthwick and M. J. Gentle. 1986a. Flow Routes of Electric Currents in Domestic Hens During Preslaughter Stunning.British Poultry Science 27:403–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • . 1986b. Tissue Resistivities and Current Pathways and Their Importance in Preslaughter Stunning of Chickens.British Poultry Science 27:301–306.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boyd, F. Humane slaughter of poultry: The case against the use of electrical stunning devices. J Agric Environ Ethics 7, 221–236 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02349038

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02349038

Keywords

Navigation