Skip to main content
Log in

Male sexual strategies modify ratings of female models with specific waist-to-hip ratios

  • Published:
Human Nature Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Female waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) has generally been an important general predictor of ratings of physical attractiveness and related characteristics. Individual differences in ratings do exist, however, and may be related to differences in the reproductive tactics of the male raters such as pursuit of short-term or long-term relationships and adjustments based on perceptions of one’s own quality as a mate. Forty males, categorized according to sociosexual orientation and physical qualities (WHR, Body Mass Index, and self-rated desirability), rated female models on both attractiveness and likelihood they would approach them. Sociosexually restricted males were less likely to approach females rated as most attractive (with 0.68–0.72 WHR), as compared with unrestricted males. Males with lower scores in terms of physical qualities gave ratings indicating more favorable evaluations of female models with lower WHR. The results indicate that attractiveness and willingness to approach are overlapping but distinguishable constructs, both of which are influenced by variations in characteristics of the raters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. L., C. B. Crawford, J. Nadeau, and T. Lindberg 1992 Was the Duchess of Windsor Right? A Cross-cultural Review of the Socioecology of Ideals of Female Body Shape. Ethology and Sociobiology 13:197–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, P.W., S. W. Gangestad, and D. Matthews 2002 Adaptationism: How to Carry Out an Exaptationist Program. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25:489–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, J. 1997 Attachment, Mating, and Parenting: An Evolutionary Interpretation. Human Nature 8:361–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorntorp, P. 1988 The Associations Between Obesity, Adipose Tissue Distribution and Disease. Acta Medica Scandinavia (Supplement) 723:121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1991 Adipose Tissue Distribution and Function. International Journal of Obesity 15:67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., and D. P. Schmitt 1993 Sexual Strategies Theory—An Evolutionary Perspective on Human Mating. Psychological Review 100:204–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denti, L., G. Pasolini, L. Sanfelici, R. Benedetti, A. Cecchetti, G. P. Ceda, F. Ablondi, and G. Valenti 2000 Aging-Related Decline of Gonadal Function in Healthy Men: Correlation with Body Composition and Lipoproteins. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 48:51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, P., and B. P. Buunk 2001 Sex Differences in the Jealousy-Evoking Nature of a Rival’s Body Build. Evolution and Human Behavior 22:335–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draper, P., and J. Belsky 1990 Personality Development in the Evolutionary Perspective. Journal of Personality 58:141–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., M. Dias, and A. McClelland 1998 The Role of Body Weight, Waist-to-hip Ratio, and Breast Size in Judgments of Female Attractiveness. Sex Roles 39:311–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., M. Lavancy, and A. McClelland 2001 Waist-to-hip Ratio and Facial Attractiveness: A Pilot Study. Personality and Individual Differences 30:491–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., and D. M. Buss 1993 Pathogen Prevalence and Human Mate Preferences. Ethology and Sociobiology 14:89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., and J. A. Simpson 1990 Toward An Evolutionary History of Female Sociosexual Variation. Journal of Personality 58:69–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 2000 The Evolution of Human Mating: Trade-Offs and Strategic Pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23:573–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haffner, S. M., R. A. Valdez, M. P. Stern, and M. S. Katz 1993 Obesity, Body Fat Distribution and Sex Hormones in Men. International Journal of Obesity Related Metabolic Disorders 17:643–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henss, R. 2000 Waist-to-hip Ratio and Female Attractiveness. Evidence from Photographic Stimuli and Methodological Considerations. Personality and Individual Differences 28:501–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jankowska, E. W. A., M. Medras, and E. Rogucka 2000a Body Mass Index, Waist/Hip Ratio and Androgen-Estrogen Activity in Younger Versus Older Polish Men. The Aging Male 3:177–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jankowska, E. A., E. Rogucka, M. Medras, and Z. Welon 2000b Relationships between Age-Related Changes of Sex Steroids, Obesity and Body Fat Distribution among Healthy Polish Males. Medical Science Monitor 6:1159–1164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, S. A., A. R. Folsom, R. J. Prineas, J. P. Potter, and S. M. Gapstur 1990 The Association of Body Fat Distribution with Lifestyle and Reproductive Factors in a Population Study of Post-Menopausal Women. International Journal of Obesity 14:583–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenrick, D. T., E. K. Sadalla, G. Groth, and M. R. Trost 1990 Evolution, Traits, and the Stages of Human Courtship: Qualifying the Parental Investment Model. Journal of Personality 58:97–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K., P. K. Smith, and A. L. Palermiti 1997 Conflict in Childhood and Reproductive Development. Evolution and Human Behavior 18:109–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, F., and A. Wetsman 2001 Preferred Waist-to-hip Ratio and Ecology. Personality and Individual Differences 30:481–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moller, A. P., M. Soler, and R. Thornhill 1995 Breast Asymmetry, Sexual Selection, and Human Reproductive Success. Ethology and Sociobiology 16:207–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. A., and S.W. Gangestad 1991 Individual Differences in Sociosexuality: Evidence for Convergent and Discriminant Validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60:870–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1992 Sociosexuality and Romantic Partner Choice. Journal of Personality 60: 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. 1993a Adaptive Significance of Female Physical Attractiveness: Role of Waistto-hip Ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65:293–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1993b Body Shape and Women’s Attractiveness: The Critical Role of Waist-to-hip Ratio. Human Nature 4:297–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1994a Body Fat Distribution and Perception of Desirable Female Body Shape by Young Black Men and Women. International Journal of Eating Disorders 16:283–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1994b Is Thin Really Beautiful and Good? Relationship between Waist-to-hip Ratio (WHR) and Female Attractiveness. Personality and Individual Differences 16:123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1995a Female Health, Attractiveness, and Desirability for Relationships: Role of Breast Asymmetry and Waist-to-Hip Ratio. Ethology and Sociobiology 16: 465–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1995b Female Judgment of Male Attractiveness and Desirability for Relationships: Role of Waist-to-hip Ratio and Financial Status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69:1089–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D., and S. Luis 1995 Ethnic and Gender Consensus for the Effect of the Waist-to-hip Ratio on Judgment of Women’s Attractiveness and Desirability for Relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology 16:484–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D., and R. K. Young 1995 Body Weight, Waist-to-hip Ratio, Breasts, and Hips: Role in Judgements of Female Attractiveness and Desirability for Relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology 16:483–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M., J. A. Simpson, and S. Gangestad 1986 Personality and Sexual Relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51:181–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, J. M., and T. Wasserman 1997 The Perception of Sexual Attractiveness: Sex Differences in Variability. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26:243–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1998 Sexual Attractiveness: Sex Differences in Assessment and Criteria. Evolution and Human Behavior 19:171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetsman, A., and F. Marlowe 1999 How Universal Are Preferences for Female Waist-to-hip Ratios? Evidence from the Hadza of Tanzania. Evolution and Human Behavior 20:219–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaastra, B. M., J. C. Seidell, P. A. H. Van Noord, E. R. te Velde, J. D. F. Habbema, B. Vrieswijk, and J. Karbaat 1993 Fat and Female Fecundity: Prospective Study of Effect of Body Fat Distribution on Conception Rates. British Medical Journal 306:484–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary L. Brase.

Additional information

Gary L. Brase is currently a Resident Instruction Assistant Professor in the Department of Psychological Sciences at the University of Columbia — Missouri. His research covers adaptive reasoning and decision making within statistical and social domains

Gary Walker completed a Bs degree in psychology at the University of Sunderland in 2002 and is currently pursuing a graduate degree.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brase, G.L., Walker, G. Male sexual strategies modify ratings of female models with specific waist-to-hip ratios. Hum Nat 15, 209–224 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-004-1020-x

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-004-1020-x

Key words

Navigation