Conclusion
The paper has sought to show two things. One is that the apparent variety of Stalnaker and Lewis's counterexamples is misleading. Several of their examples are quite unsatisfactory because they depend on unguarded language behavior. There is in fact only one type of counterexample that is worth serious discussion, and that has the form of Barense's.
For Barense's example, I try to show that it fails as a counterexample to transitivity because one of the premisses is false within the context of the example. However, Barense's example is problematic for the Stalnaker-Lewis analysis, since their device for avoiding transitivity (rejecting the rule of conditional proof) does not in fact eliminate anomalous conclusions that can be drawn when both the premisses are taken as true.
In sum, there appears to be no good reason to doubt thatif is transitive, that the antecedent of a conditional can be strengthened, and that the contrapositive can be inferred. And the rule of conditional proof does seem to capture a commonly accepted form of argument in support ofif-then statements.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, E. W.: 1970, ‘Subjunctive and Indicative Conditionals’,Foundations of Language 6, 89–94.
Chisholm, R.: 1946, ‘The Contrary-to-Fact Conditional’,Mind 55, 289–307.
Geis, M., and Zwicky, A. M.: 1971, ‘On Invited Inferences’,Linguistic Inquiry 2, 561–566.
Goodman, N.: 1947, ‘The Problem of Counterfactual Conditionals’,Journal of Philosophy 44, 113–128.
Goodman, N.: 1965,Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, Bobbs-Merrill, New York.
Kutschera, F. von: 1974, ‘Indicative Conditionals’,Theoretical Linguistics 1, 257–269.
Lewis, D.: 1973,Counterfactuals, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Rescher, N.: 1964,Hypothetical reasoning, North Holland, Amsterdam.
Stalnaker, R. C.: 1968, ‘A Theory of Conditionals’. In N. Rescher (Ed.),Studies in Logical Theory, American Philosophical Quarterly, Monograph No. 2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Braine, M.D.S. On some claims aboutif-then . Linguist Philos 3, 35–47 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00578447
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00578447