Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter March 6, 2019

Politische Erziehung und politische Stabilität bei Thomas Hobbes

  • Dirk Brantl EMAIL logo

Abstract

Hobbes’ theory of political education and its impact on his political thought has received relatively little attention. Existing contributions rarely extend beyond Hobbes’ political philosophy to analyze how he understood education to work in the first place. This article aims to fill in the gap by first reconstructing Hobbes’ understanding of the mechanism of teaching and learning. Tracing the continuities and developments of the concept from the Elements of Law (1640) to Behemoth (1668) in the first section, the second half sketches the theory of political education and its importance to the central issue of Hobbes’ political thought, the generation of sustained political stability. The core question turns out to be: Is teaching the truth in political matters compatible with political stability? The article argues that while those who answer the question in the negative provide insufficient textual evidence, those who affirm it are hard pressed to describe a content of political education that could be politically effective.

EW

Molesworth, W. (Hg.) 1839–45. The English Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury. 11 Bde. London.

OL

Molesworth, W. (Hg.) 1839–45. Thomae Hobbes opera philosophica quae Latine scripsit omnia. 5 Bde. London.

Bejan, T. 2010. „Teaching the Leviathan. Thomas Hobbes on Education”. Oxford Review of Education 36/5, 607–626.10.1080/03054985.2010.514438Search in Google Scholar

Boonin-Vail, D. 1994. Thomas Hobbes and the Science of Moral Virtue. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Brockdorff, C. Baron von 1919. Thomas Hobbes im Lichte seiner didaktischen und pädagogischen Bedeutung. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Philosophie und der Pädagogik. Kiel/Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar

Curley, E. 2004. „The Covenant with God in Hobbes’s Leviathan“. In Leviathan after 350 Years. Hg. T. Sorell/L. Foisneau. Oxford, 199–216.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199264612.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Foisneau, L. 2004. „Leviathan’s Theory of Justice”. In Leviathan after 350 Years. Hg. T. Sorell/L. Foisneau. Oxford, 105–122.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199264612.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Gauthier, D. 1969. The Logic of Leviathan. The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Hampton, J. 1986. Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511625060Search in Google Scholar

Hobbes, Th. ca. 1630–38. The Whole Art of Rhetoric. In EW, Bd. VI, 419–510.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1640. The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic. Hg. F. Tönnies. Nachdruck London 1969.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1642/47. De Cive. Paris/Amsterdam. In OL, Bd. II, 133–432.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1645. Of Liberty and Necessity. In EW, Bd. IV, 229–278.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1651. Leviathan, or The Matter, Forme, and Power of a Common-Wealth Eccesiasticall and Civil. London. Hg. C.B. Macpherson. London 1968.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1656a. De Corpore. In EW, Bd. i.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1656b. The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, and Chance, London. In EW, Bd. V.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1656c. Six Lessons to the Professors of Arithmetic. In EW, Bd. VII, 181–356.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1658. De Homine, London. In OL, Bd. II, 1–132.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1668. Behemoth, or The Long Parliament. Hg. F. Tönnies. ND Chicago, IL/London 1990.Search in Google Scholar

Hoekstra, K. 2006. „The End of Philosophy – The Case of Hobbes”. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106/1, 23–60.10.1111/j.1467-9264.2006.00187.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kavka, G. 1986. Hobbesian Moral and Political Philosophy. Princeton, NJ.10.1515/9780691222967Search in Google Scholar

Lloyd, S. A. 1992. Ideals as Interests in Hobbes’s Leviathan. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511611971Search in Google Scholar

–. 1997: „Coercion, Ideology, and Education in Hobbes’s Leviathan”. In Reclaiming the History of Ethics. Essays for John Rawls. Hg. A. Reath, B. Herman und Chr. Korsgaard. Cambridge, 36–65.10.1017/CBO9780511527258.003Search in Google Scholar

–. 2009. Morality in the Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. Cases in the Laws of Nature. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Ludwig, B. 1998. Die Wiederentdeckung des epikureischen Naturrechts. Zu Thomas Hobbes’ philosophischer Entwicklung von De Cive zum Leviathan im Pariser Exil 1640–1651. Frankfurt/M.Search in Google Scholar

Marshall, J.D. 1980. „Thomas Hobbes. Education and Obligation in the Commonwealth”. In Journal of Philosophy of Education 14/2, 193–203.10.1111/j.1467-9752.1980.tb00554.xSearch in Google Scholar

McNeilly, F.S. 1968. The Anatomy of Leviathan. London.Search in Google Scholar

Parkin, J. 2007. Taming the Leviathan. The Reception of the Political and Religious Ideas of Thomas Hobbes in England 1640–1700. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511720499Search in Google Scholar

Peters, R.S. 1956. Hobbes. Harmondsworth.Search in Google Scholar

Robertson, G.C. 1886. Hobbes. Edinburgh/London.Search in Google Scholar

Schotte, D. 2013: Die Entmachtung Gottes durch den Leviathan. Thomas Hobbes über Religion. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt.Search in Google Scholar

Schröder, P. 2015: „Einleitung“. In Th. Hobbes. Behemoth. Hg. P. Schröder. Hamburg 2015, vii–liii.10.1007/978-3-658-08920-7_1Search in Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. 1996. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511598579Search in Google Scholar

Strauss, L. 1936. The Political Philosophy of Hobbes. Its Basis and its Genesis. Chicago, IL.Search in Google Scholar

Tuck, R. 1998. „Hobbes on Education”. In Philosophers on Education. Historical Perspectives. Hg. A. Oksenberg Rorty. London/New York, NY, 148–156.Search in Google Scholar

Vaughan, G. 2002. Behemoth Teaches Leviathan. Hobbes on Political Education. Lanham, MD.Search in Google Scholar

Waldron, J. 1998. „Hobbes, Truth, Publicity, and Civil Doctrine”. In Philosophers on Education. Historical Perspectives. Hg. A. Oksenberg Rorty. London/New York, NY, 139–147.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2001. „Hobbes and the Principle of Publicity”. In Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 82/3–4, 447–474.10.1111/1468-0114.00136Search in Google Scholar

Watkins, J.W.N. 1973. Thomas Hobbes’s System of Ideas. A Study in the Political Significance of Philosophical Theories. London, 2. Aufl.Search in Google Scholar

Weiß, U. 1980. Das philosophische System von Thomas Hobbes. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-03-06
Published in Print: 2019-03-01

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/agph-2019-1003/html
Scroll to top button