Skip to main content
Log in

Relationality and Consensus in Japan: Implications for Bioethics Policy

  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the Japanese notion of relationality, that is, the idea that the individual is defined primarily within a web of relationships. Furthermore, it proposes that this relationality provides an ontological basis for morality, particularly the critical need for achieving consensus. This need for consensus is evident in the dispute over brain death. It was also conspicuous in the long-standing debate regarding heart transplantation. By reviewing key features of relationality, the study also demonstrates that the Japanese approach toward consensus reflects certain cultural values such as the importance of nemawashi. This inquiry thereby evokes the brain death and heart transplantation controversy in order to illustrate the critical need for consensus in the decision-making process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brannigan, M.C. Relationality and Consensus in Japan: Implications for Bioethics Policy. Health Care Analysis 7, 289–296 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009448825540

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009448825540

Navigation