Abstract
This article improves our understanding of the reasons underlying the intellectual migration of scientists from existing cognitive domains to nascent scientific fields. To that purpose we present, first, a number of findings from the sociology of science that give different insights about scientific migration. We then attempt to bring some of these insights together under the conceptual roof of an actor-based approach linking expected utility and diffusion theory. Intellectual migration is seen as the choice of scientists who decide under uncertainty and on the base of estimations about probabilities, costs, and benefits of the migration. The resulting choice model can be used as a heuristic base for further exploration of the subject.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Åkerlind, Gerlese S. 2008. An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: an integration of the literature. Studies in Higher Education 33(1): 17–31.
Becher, Tony, and Paul R. Trowler. 2001. Academic Tribes and Territories: intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Open University Press/SRHE.
Ben-David, Joseph. 1965. Scientific Productivity and Academic Organization in Nineteenth Century Medicine. In Science and society, ed. Norman Kaplan (Hrsg.), 39–62. Chicago: Rand McNally & Company.
Ben-David, Joseph. 1991. Social Factors in the Origins of a New Science. In Joseph Ben-David. Scientific growth, ed. Gad Freudenthal, 49–69. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bloor, David. 1976. Knowledge and social imagery. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Bonaccorsi, Andrea. 2007. Explaining poor performance of European science: Institutions versus policies. Science and Public Policy 34(5): 303–316.
Bonaccorsi, Andrea. 2008. Search regimes and the industrial dynamics of science. Minerva 46(3): 285–315.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1975. The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information 14(6): 19–47.
Braun, Dietmar. 2003. Lasting tensions in research policy-making: A delegation problem. Science and Public Policy 30(5): 309–322.
Braun, Dietmar, and Fabrizio Gilardi. 2006. Taking ‘Galton’s problem’ seriously. Towards a theory of policy diffusion. Journal of Theoretical Politics 18(3): 298–322.
Chubin, Daryl E. 1976. The conceptualization of scientific specialties. Sociological Quarterly 17(4): 448–476.
Clark, Burton C. 1995. Complexity and differentiation: the deepening problem of university integration. In Emerging patterns of social demand and university reform: through a glass darkly, eds. David Dill, and Barbara Sporn. Oxford: IAU press/Elsevier.
Crane, Diana. 1972. Invisible colleges. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
De Solla Price, Derek J. 1963. Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
De Solla Price, Derek J. 1971. Some remarks on elitism in information and the inviable college phenomenon in science. American Society for Information Science Journal 22(2): 74–75.
Dogan, Mattei, and Robert Pahre. 1990. Creative marginality. Innovations at the intersection of science. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Edge, David. 1990. Competition in modern science. Solomon’s House Revisited. Science History Publications. Canton MA:208-32.
Esser, Hartmut. 1993. The rationality of everyday behaviour. A rational choice reconstruction of the theory of action by Alfred Schütze. Rationality and Society 5(1): 7–31.
Frickel, Scott, and Neil Gross. 2005. A general theory of scientific/intellectual movements. American Sociological Review 70(2): 204–232.
Fuchs, Stephan. 1993. A sociological theory of scientific change. Social Forces 71(4): 933–953.
Holton, Gerald. 1962. Scientific research and scholarship notes toward the design of proper scales. Daedalus 91(2): 362–399.
Kitcher, Philip. 1995. The advancement of science: Science without legend, objectivity without illusions. Oxford University Press, USA.
Kogan, Maurice. 2000. Higher education communities and academic identity. Higher Education Quarterly 54(3): 207–216.
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1968. The history of science. In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. XIV, ed. David S. Sills (Hrsg.), 74–83.
Lamont, Michèle. 2010. Looking back at Bourdieu. In Cultural Analysis, and Bourdieu’s Legacy, eds. Elizabeth Silva and Alan Warde, 128–141. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory life. The social construction of scientific facts. London: Sage.
Manathunga, Catherine (2009) Post-colonial perspectives on interdisciplinary researcher identities. In Academic research and researchers, eds. Angela Brew and Lisa Lucas, 131–45. Maidenhead: Open University Press, MacGraw Hill.
Rogers, Everett M. 1995. Diffusion of innovations. New York: McMillan.
van den Daele, Wolfgang. 1977. The Social Construction of Science: Institutionalisation and Definition. In The Social production of scientific knowledge, eds. Everett Mendelsohn, Peter Weingart and Richard Whitley, 27–54. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing.
Weingart, Peter. 1997. From “Finalization” to “Mode 2”: old wine in new bottles. Social Science Information 36(4): 591–613.
Whitley, Richard. 2000. The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford University Press, USA.
Zuccala, Alesia, and Peter van den Besselaar. 2005. Modelling the invisible college. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57(2): 152–168.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Braun, D. Why do Scientists Migrate? A Diffusion Model. Minerva 50, 471–491 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-012-9214-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-012-9214-6