Skip to main content
Log in

Zimbardo's “Stanford Prison Experiment” and the relevance of social psychology for teaching business ethics

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The prevailing pedagogical approach in business ethics generally underestimates or even ignores the powerful influences of situational factors on ethical analysis and decision-making. This is due largely to the predominance of philosophy-oriented teaching materials. Social psychology offers relevant concepts and experiments that can broaden pedagogy to help students understand more fully the influence of situational contexts and role expectations in ethical analysis. Zimbardo's “Stanford Prison Experiment” is used to illustrate the relevance of social psychology experiments for business ethics instruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Aron, A. and E. Aron: 1986, The Heart of Social Psychology (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahm, A.: 1982, ‘Teaching Ethics without Ethics to Teach’, Journal of Business Ethics 1, 43–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, V.: 1986, Moral Issues in Business, Third Ed. (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T.: 1983, Case Studies in Business, Society, and Ethics (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. and N. Bowie: 1983, Ethical Theory and Business, Second Ed. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bommer, M., C. Gratto, J. Gravander, and M. Tuttle: 1987, ‘A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision Making’, Journal of Business Ethics 6(4), 265–280.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brodeur, P.: 1985, Outrageous Misconduct: The Asbestos Industry on Trial (Pantheon, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D.: 1985, ‘Cognitive Development and Teaching Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 4, 313–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daneke, G.: 1985, ‘Regulation and the Sociopathic Firm’, Academy of Management Review 10(1), 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. and W. Frederick: 1984, Business and Society: Management, Public Policy, Ethics, Fifth Ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGeorge, R.: 1986, Business Ethics, Second Ed. (Macmillan, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • DesJardins, J. and J. McCall: 1985, Contemporary Issues in Business Ethics (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and P. Werhane: 1983, Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach, Second Ed. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermann, M. and R. Lundman: 1982, Corporate and Governmental Deviance: Problems of Organizational Behavior in Contemporary Society, Second Ed. (Oxford University Press, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. and R. Cohen: 1982, Equity and Justice in Social Behavior (Academic Press, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, C., C. Banks, and P. Zimbardo: 1973, ‘Interpersonal Dynamics in a Simulated Prison’, International Journal of Criminology and Penology 1, 69–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, K.: 1983, ‘Book Review: Business Ethics’, California Management Review 26(1), 162–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, R. and E. Gray: 1981, Business and Society: Cases and Text (Southwestern Publishing, Cincinnati, OH).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, W. and H. Sims, Jr.: 1978, ‘Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment’, Journal of Applied Psychology 63(4), 451–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, W. and H. Sims, Jr.: 1979, ‘Organizational Philosophy, Policies, and Objectives Related to Unethical Decision Behavior: A Laboratory Experiment’, Journal of Applied Psychology 64(3), 331–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoagland, J.: 1984, ‘Ethical Theory and Practice: Is There a Gap?’, Journal of Business Ethics 3, 201–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, W. and J. Moore: 1984, Business Ethics: Readings and Cases in Corporate Morality (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E. and R. Hunt: 1972, Classic Contributions to Social Psychology (Oxford University Press, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, T. and C. Korte: 1976, ‘The Responsive Bystander: Why He Helps’, in T. Lickona (ed.), Moral Development and Behavior (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, NY), 269–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpf, F.: 1932, American Social Psychology: Its Origins, Development, and European Background (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J.: 1980, ‘Concerted Ignorance: The Social Psychology of Cover-up’, in R. Elliott and J. Willingham (eds.), Management Fraud: Detection and Deterrence (Petrocelli Books, New York, NY), 149–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D. and R. Kahn: 1978, The Social Psychology of Organizations, Second Ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtines, W.: 1984, ‘Moral Behavior as Rule-governed Behavior: A Psychosocial Role-theoretical Approach to Moral Behavior and Development’, in W. Kurtines and J. Gewirtz (eds.), Morality, Moral Behavior, and Moral Development (John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY), 303–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latane, B. and J. Darley: 1970, The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't He Help? (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, C.: 1985, ‘A Review of Moral Issues in Business’, Journal of Business Ethics 4, 129–130, 136, 144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lickona, T.: 1980, ‘What Does Moral Psychology Have to Say to the Teacher of Ethics?’ in D. Callahan and S. Bok (eds.), Ethics Teaching in Higher Education (Plenum Press, New York, NY), 103–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machan, T. and D. Den Uyl: 1987, ‘Recent Work in Business Ethics: A Survey and Critique’, American Philosophical Quarterly 24(2), 107–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S.: 1963, ‘Behavioral Study of Obedience’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67, 371–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S.: 1965, ‘Some Conditions to Obedience and Disobedience to Authority’, Human Relations 18(1), 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastin, M.: 1985, ‘Business Ethics, by the Book’, Business Horizons 28(1), 2–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhan, D., B. Moore, and B. Underwood: 1976, ‘The Social Psychology of Moral Behavior’, in T. Lickona (ed.), Moral Development and Behavior (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, NY), 241–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub, E.: 1971, ‘Helping a Person in Distress: The Influence of Implicit and Explicit “Rules” of Conduct on Children and Adults’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 17, 137–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub, E.: 1977, Positive Social Behavior and Morality (Academic Press, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, G. and J. Steiner: 1985, Business, Government, and Society: A Managerial Approach, Fourth Ed. (Random House, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturdivant, F.: 1985, Business and Society: A Managerial Approach, Third Ed. (Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L.: 1986, ‘Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-situation Interactionist Model’, Academy of Management Review 11(3), 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valasquez, M.: 1982, Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P.: 1982, ‘Pathology of Imprisonment’, in D. Krebs (ed.), Readings in Social Psychology: Contemporary Perspectives, Second Ed. (Harper & Row, New York, NY), 249–251.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

F. Neil Brady is an Associate Professor of Management at San Diego State University. He has published a dozen articles in the field of business ethics, three of which have appeared in the Academy of Management Review.

Jeanne M. Logsdon is an Assistant Professor of Management at Santa Clara University. Her research on various aspects of corporate social performance has appeared in the Journal of Business Ethics, Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, and California Management Review.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brady, F.N., Logsdon, J.M. Zimbardo's “Stanford Prison Experiment” and the relevance of social psychology for teaching business ethics. J Bus Ethics 7, 703–710 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382981

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382981

Keywords

Navigation