Abstract
We aim to show anti-commodification theorists that their complaints about the scope of the market are exaggerated. There are we agree things that should not be bought and sold but that’s only because they are things people shouldn’t have or do or exchange in the first place. Beyond that we argue there are legitimate moral worries about how we buy trade and sell but no legitimate worries about what we buy trade and sell. In almost every interesting case where they have argued markets are morally impermissible on the contrary we argue such markets are permissible. Where they see the market as having a fundamentally amoral ethos or as tending to corrupt us we see it as moral and morally ameliorative. Where they think the solution is to contract the market we think the solution is to expand it.
References
Anderson, Elizabeth. 1990. “Is Women’s Labor a Commodity?” Philosophy and Public Affairs 19: 71–92.10.4324/9781003073789-9Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. 1995. Value in Ethics and Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. 2000. “Why Commercial Surrogate Motherhood Unethically Commodifies Women and Children: Reply to McLachlan and Swales,” Health Care Analysis 8: 19–26.10.1023/A:1009477906883Search in Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin. 2008. Consumed: How Markets Corrupt Children, Infantalize Adults, and Swallow Citizens Whole. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.Search in Google Scholar
Brennan, Jason, and Peter Jaworski. 2015a. “Markets without Symbolic Limits,” Ethics 125: 1053–1077.10.1086/680907Search in Google Scholar
Brennan, Jason, and Peter Jaworksi. 2015b. Markets without Limits. New York: Routledge Press.10.4324/9781315818085Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 2009. Why Not Socialism? Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Grant, Ruth. 2012. Strings Attached: Untangling the Ethics of Incentives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.23943/princeton/9780691151601.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Gwartney, James, Lawson, Robert, and Joshua Hall. 2012. Economic Freedom of the World: 2012 Annual Report. Vancouver: Fraser Institute.Search in Google Scholar
Jamieson, Alistair. 2009. “Brain-Eating Tribe Could Help Find Treatment for Mad Cow Disease,” The Telegraph Nov 19, 2009. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/papuanewguinea/6603676/Brain-eating-tribe-could-help-find-treatment-for-mad-cow-disease.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Jaworski, Peter, and Jason Brennan. 2015. “Market Architecture: It’s the How, Not the What,” Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy 15: 231–250.Search in Google Scholar
Murray, Charles. 2012. Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960–2010. New York: Crown Forum.Search in Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret Jane. 1997. “Market-Inalienability,” Harvard Law Review 100: 1849–1937.10.2307/1341192Search in Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret Jane. 2000. Contested Commodities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv2dgc8d8Search in Google Scholar
Ritzer, George. 2012. The McDonaldization of Society: 20th Anniversary Edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael. 2012. What Money Can’t Buy. New York: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux.Search in Google Scholar
Satz, Debra. 2010. Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale. New York: Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311594.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Satz, Debra. 2011. Econtalk interview with Russ Roberts, accessed August 21, 2015. http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2011/08/satz_on_markets.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Skidelsky, Robert, and Skidelsky, Edward. 2013. How Much Is Enough: Money and the Good Life. New York: Other Press.Search in Google Scholar
Stevenson, Betsy, and Justin Wolfers. 2008. “Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 39: 1–102.10.3386/w14282Search in Google Scholar
Tomasi, John. 2012. Free Market Fairness. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.23943/princeton/9780691144467.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter