Skip to main content

Reflections on Chimisso: French Philosophy of Science and the Historical Method

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Present Situation in the Philosophy of Science

Part of the book series: The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective ((PSEP,volume 1))

  • 1005 Accesses

Abstract

Over the past several years there has emerged a collective and conscious effort aiming to understand the history of philosophy of science. This has led to the renewed examination of the Vienna Circle and logical positivism, which is considered as one of the main sources of philosophy of science in the English-speaking world. Yet there have also been attempts to explore the development of other schools of thought. A study of the French tradition raises several questions, in particular the reception of this tradition and its salient recourse to a historical approach. Attention has turned from the well-known Bachelardian school to earlier philosophers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Bachelard Gaston (1934), Le nouvel esprit scientifique, Paris, PUF, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1972), L’engagement rationaliste, Paris, PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitbol Michel and Jean Gayon (2006) (eds), L’épistémologie française: 1830-1970, Paris, PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunschvicg Léon (1958), Écrits philosophiques, Paris, PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner Anastasios (2003), Les origines françaises de la philosophie des sciences, Paris, PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2005), “Réconcilier les sciences et les lettres: le rôle de l’histoire des sciences selon Paul Tannery, Gaston Milhaud et Abel Rey”, Revue d’histoire des sciences, vol. 58, p. 433-454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner Anastasios and Jean Gayon (2009) (eds), French Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vienna, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canguilhem Georges (1966). Le normal et le pathologique, Paris, PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1968), Études d’histoire et de philosophie des sciences, Paris, Vrin, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chimisso Cristina (2008), Writing the History of the Mind: Philosophy and Science in France, 1900 to 1960s, Aldershot, Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte Auguste (1830–1842), Cours de philosophie positive, M. Serres, F. Dagognet A. Sinaceur and J.P. Enthoven (eds), new ed. revised, 2 vols, Paris, Hermann, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem Pierre (1906), La Théorie physique, son objet, sa structure, Paris, Vrin, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1913), Notice sur les titres et travaux scientifiques, Bordeaux, Gounouilhou.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking (2002), Historical Ontology, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyré Alexandre (1966), Études d’histoire de la pensée scientifique, Paris, Gallimard, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecourt Dominique (2008), Georges Canguilhem, Paris, PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Roy Édouard (1901), “Un positivisme nouveau”, Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 9, p. 138-153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévy-Bruhl Lucien (1900), La philosophie d’Auguste Comte, Paris, Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson Émile (2009), Lettres françaises, B. Bensaude-Vincent and Eva Telkes Klein (eds), Paris, CNRS Éditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milhaud Gaston (1893), Leçons sur les origins de la science grecque, Paris, Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1902), Le positivisme et le progrès de l’esprit: Études critiques sur Auguste Comte, Paris, Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1911), Nouvelles etudes sur l’histoire de la pensée scientifique, Paris, Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1927), La philosophie de Charles Renouvier, Paris, Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré Henri (1902), La Science et l’hypothèse, Paris, Flammarion, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner Pierre (2002) (ed.), Les philosophes et la science, Paris, Gallimard, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worms Frédéric (2005) (ed.), Le moment 1900 en philosophie, Lille, Septentrion.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anastasios Brenner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brenner, A. (2010). Reflections on Chimisso: French Philosophy of Science and the Historical Method. In: Stadler, F. (eds) The Present Situation in the Philosophy of Science. The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9115-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics