Skip to main content
Log in

The Epistemology and Ontology of Human-Computer Interaction

  • General Article
  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes epistemological and ontological dimensions of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) through an analysis of the functions of computer systems in relation to their users. It is argued that the primary relation between humans and computer systems has historically been epistemic: computers are used as information-processing and problem-solving tools that extend human cognition, thereby creating hybrid cognitive systems consisting of a human processor and an artificial processor that process information in tandem. In this role, computer systems extend human cognition. Next, it is argued that in recent years, the epistemic relation between humans and computers has been supplemented by an ontic relation. Current computer systems are able to simulate virtual and social environments that extend the interactive possibilities found in the physical environment. This type of relationship is primarily ontic, and extends to objects and places that have a virtual ontology. Increasingly, computers are not just information devices, but portals to worlds that we inhabit. The aforementioned epistemic and ontic relationships are unique to information technology and distinguish human-computer relationships from other human-technology relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brey P. (2000). ȁ8Theories of Technology as Extension of Human Facultiesȁ9. In: Mitcham C. (ed) Metaphysics, Epistemology, and Technology Research in Philosophy and Technology vol 19. London, Elsevier/JAI Press, pp. 59-78

    Google Scholar 

  • Brey, P. (2003), ȁ8The Social Ontology of Virtual Environments,ȁ9 in D. Koepsell and L. Moss, eds., John Searleȁ9s Ideas About Social Reality: Extensions, Criticisms and Reconstructions, Blackwell Publishing.

  • Clark A. and Chalmers D. (1998). ȁ8The Extended Mindȁ9. Analysis 58: 7-19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark A. (2001). ȁ8Reasons, Robots and The Extended Mindȁ9. Mind and Language 16(2): 121-145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs: minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. New York, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (forthcoming), ȁ8Mementoȁ9s Revenge: Objections and Replies to the Extended Mindȁ9, in R. Menary, ed., The Extended Mind, Ashgate.

  • Donald M. (1991). Origins of the Modern Mind. Cambridge and London, Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (1999), Philosophy and Computing. An Introduction, London and New York: Routledge.

  • Hutchins E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsh D. and Maglio P. (1994). ȁ8On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic actionȁ9. Cognitive Science 18: 513-49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (1966/1964), Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, New York: McGraw-Hill. Paperback edition, 1966.

  • Marr, D. (1982), Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information, W.H. Freeman Publ.

  • Newell A. and Simon H. (1976). ȁ8Computer Science as Empirical Inquiry: Symbols and Searchȁ9. Communications of the ACM 19: 113-126

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Norman D. (1993). Things that Make us Smart: Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine, Reading. MA, Addison-Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry M. (2003). ȁ8Distributed Cognitionȁ9. In: Carroll J., (ed) HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science. San Francisco, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 193-224

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peschl M. and Stary C. (1998). ȁ8The Role of Cognitive Modeling for User Interface Design Representations: An Epistemological Analysis of Knowledge Engineering in the Context of Human-Computer Interactionȁ9. Minds and Machines 8: 203-236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon G. (ed) (1993). Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. New York, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny, K. (forthcoming), ȁ8Externalism, Epistemic Artefacts and the Extended Mindȁ9, in R. Schantz, ed., The Externalist Challenge: New Studies on Cognition and Intentionality, Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.

  • Turkle S. (1995). Life on the Screen; Identity in the Age of the Internet.New York, Simon & Schuster

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to PHILIP BREY.

Additional information

This paper was originally presented as an invited plenary talk at E-CAP 2005 at Mälardalen University in Sweden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BREY, P. The Epistemology and Ontology of Human-Computer Interaction. Mind Mach 15, 383–398 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-005-9003-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-005-9003-1

Key words:

Navigation