Abstract
A socialist health service cannot be a socialist island in a sea of capitalism, as the record of the British National Health Service shows. Nonetheless, since health is a basic need, it can be a key component of the advocacy of socialism. I propose two central socialist principles. On the basis of these I suggest that a socialist health system would emphasise care rather than service; insist on democratic structures and control of resources; and require the prohibition of private medicine.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hardy, J. (1996). Untitled article.The Guardian, ‘The Week’ section, 14 December, 3.
Thunhurst, C. (1982).It Makes You Sick: The Politics of the NHS, Pluto Press, London, 93.
That is to say, I aim to attempt to offer a set of background considerations for the sorts of views expressed in Socialist Health Association (1996).The Campaign For A Socialist Health Service, Socialist Health Association, London.
Letwin, O. and Redwood, J. (1988).Britain’s Biggest Enterprise: Ideas for Radical Reform of the NHS, Centre for Policy Studies, London, 15, 16.
Thus Doyal, L. and Gough, I. (1991).A Theory of Human Need, Macmillan, London, for example, in their widely acclaimed defence of the view that there are fundamental human needs which cannot be reduced to individual and/or cultural preferences: the trouble with their approach is precisely that they do not showhow the (alleged) gap between ‘is’ and ‘ought’ (between something’s being a universal human need and anyone’s obligation to do something about it) is to be bridged. The problem appears quite widespread among left-wing critics of subjectivism and/or relativism, largely on account of their suspicion of any rationalistic, or Kantian, theory of morality: an example of the corrosive impact of the postmodern ‘critique’ of what it takes Enlightenment rationality to consist in.
Bevan, A. (1978, first published 1952).In Place of Fear, Quartet Books, London, 98.
Webster, C. (ed.) (1991).Aneurin Bevan on the National Health Service, Wellcome Unit for the History of Medicine, Oxford.
Elliott, G. (1993).Labourism and the English Genius: The Strange Death of Labour England?, Verso, London.
Bevan, op. cit. n.6, 115.
Widgery, D. (1979).Health in Danger: The Crisis in the National Health Service, Macmillan, London, 47.
Bevan, op. cit. n.6, 99, 100.
Letwin and Redwood, op. cit. ( n.4, 6.
Thunhurst, op. cit. ( n.2, 93. Compare Mitchell, J. (1984).What Is To Be Done About Illness and Health?, Penguin and the Socialist Society, London, pp. 17–18.
Berki, R. N. (1975).Socialism, J. M. Dent and Sons Ltd, London.
Callinicos, A. (1991).The Revenge of History: Marxism and the East European Revolutions, Polity Press, Oxford, offers an excellent analysis of the latter, and one which is a welcome antidote to any naive interpretation of Fukuyama, F. (1989). The end of history?The National Interest 16, 3–18.
Rawls, J. (1972).A Theory of Justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 303.
Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals, In,Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, n.d., Berlin, p. 429.
Marx, K. (1875).Critique of the Gotha Programme, Progressive Publishers, Moscow, p. 22.
‘…freedom can never be located in the fact that the rational subject is able to make a choice in opposition to his (legislative) reason…Only free-dom in relation to the internal legislation of reason is properly a capacity; the possibility of deviating from it is an incapacity’ Kant, I. (1797). The general introduction to the Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals, In,Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, n.d., Berlin, pp. 226–227. My interpretation of Kant owes much to Korsgaard, C. (1996).Creating the Kingdom of Ends, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Marx, K. (1961).Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844, Progressive Publishers, Moscow, p. 85.
Bevan, op. cit. n.6, 98.
Mitchell, op. cit. ( n.13, 225.
Iliffe, S. (1983).The NHS: A Picture of Health?, Lawrence and Wishart, London.
Brecher, B. (1997).Getting What You Want? A Critique of Liberal Morality, Routledge, London (forthcoming).
East Sussex, Brighton and Hove Health Authority (1996).Annual Report 1995–6, Lewes.
Hart, J. T. (1994).Feasible Socialism: The National Health Service, Past, Present and Future, Socialist Health Association, London, p. 95.
Thunhurst, op. cit. ( n.2, 97.
Mitchell, op. cit. ( n.13, 31 (my emphasis).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brecher, B. What would a socialist health service look like?. Health Care Anal 5, 217–225 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678380
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678380