Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Female circumcision in nigeria: Is it not time for government intervention?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the attitudes of circumcised women towards female circumcision in a community where the practice is in vogue. Also described are the type of circumcision performed, who usually performs the circumcision and complications. One hundred volunteers across the social strata were interviewed by means of a structured questionnaire. Data were analysed using frequency tables. The study revealed that 62% of respondents favoured the practice as an instrument for the control of female sexuality and maintenance of cultural pride. Circumcision is mainly by excision of the clitoris and the labia minora performed mainly by traditional birth attendants (TBAs). Complications include severe pain, difficulty with urination and excessive bleeding. Based on the findings, it is suggested that communities where femal genital mutilation (FGM) is practised as a social norm should be involved in any eradication campaign, with the support of national and international organisations. Research is also essential to understand FGM in order to design effective reforms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dorkenoo, E. and Elsworthy, S. (1992). Female genital mutilation: proposals for change.London Minority Rights,43.

  2. Hosken, F.P. (1993).The Hosken Report: Genital and Sexual Mutilation of Females, 4th rev. edition, Women’s International Network News, Lexington, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Toubia, N. (1993).Female Genital Mutilation. A Call For Global Action, Women Link, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lightfoot-Klein, H. (1989).Prisoners of Ritual: An Odyssey into Female Genital Circumcision in Africa, Harrington Park Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  5. World Health Organisation (1986). A traditional practice that threatens health—female circumcision.WHO Chronicle 40(1), 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baasher, T.A. (1977).Psychological Aspects of Female Circumcision, WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region.

  7. Arbesman, M., Kahler, and Buck, G.M. (1993). Assessment of the impact of female circumcision on the gynaecological, genitourinary and obstetrical health problems of women from Somalia: literature review and case studies.Women and Health 20(3), 27–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. United Nations Children Fund (1994).Guidelines for UNICEF Action on Eliminating Female Genital Mutilation, memorandum from James P. Grant, Executive Director (unpublished).

  9. Calder, B.L. and Brown, T.M. (1993). Female circumcision/genital mutilation: culturally sensitive care.Health Care for Women International 14(3), 227–238.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lightfoot-Klein, H. and Shaw, E. (1991). Special needs of ritually circumcised women patients.Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and Neonatal Nursing 20(2), 102–107.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Armstrong, S. (1991). Female circumcision fighting a cruel tradition.New Scientist 1754, 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dorkenoo, E. (1995). WHO (Female Genital Mutilation). Personal communication 25 October and 20 December.

  13. Black, T.A. and Debelle, G.D. (1995). Female genital mutilation in Britain.British Medical Journal 310(6994), 1590–1592.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gallard, C. (1995). Female genital mutilation in France.British Medical Journal 310(6994), 1592–1593.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hosken, F.P. (1995). Woman’s International News. Legal status of FGM in various countries. Personal communication.

  16. Modupe, O.O. and Lola, V.A. (1985). Female circumcision in Nigeria: a fact or farce?Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 31, 180–184.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Slack, A.T. (1988). Female circumcision: a critical appraisal.Human Rights Quarterly 10, 437–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hicks, E.K. (1993). Infibulation.Female Mutilation In Islamic Northeastern Africa, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Assaad, M.B. (1980). Female circumcision in Egypt. Social implications, current research and prospects for change.Studies in Family Planning 11(1), 3–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. El Saadawi, N. (1980).The Hidden Face of Eve: Women in the Arab World, Bacon Press.

  21. World Health Organisation and International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics Task Force (1992). C female circumcision: female genital mutilation.European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Reproductive Biology 45(2) 153–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ntiri, D.W. (1993). Circumcision and health among rural women of Southern Somalia as part of a family life survey.Health Care for Women International 14(3), 215–226.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dirie, M.A. and Lindmark, G. (1991). Female circumcision in Somalia and women’s motives.Acta Obstetricia et Gynaecologica Scandinavica 70(7–8), 581–585.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. World Health Organisation (1982).Female Circumcision Statement of WHO Position and Activities (unpublished).

  25. United Nations Population Fund (1995). Population award. Eyeing the prize.Populi 22(3), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  26. US Agency for International Development (1995).USAID’s Approach to Female Genital Mutilation, USAID, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  27. United Nations (1994).Report of the International Conference on Population and Development, 5–13 September, Cairo, (preliminary version), UN, New York.

  28. Inter-African Committee (1995). Ghana legislation against FGM. (Abstracted from IAC Newsletter). In, R.P. Hosken (ed.),Women’s International Network News 21(3), 38.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mohamud, A. (1992).Female Genital Mutilation: A Continuing Violation of the Human Rights of Young Women, ICAF/Passages.

  30. Toubia, N. (1995). (RAINB) (Female genital mutilation). Personal communication, 5 October and 12 December.

  31. Ladjali, I.M. and Toubia, N. (1990). Female circumcision: desperately seeking a space for women.IPPF Medical Bulletin 24(2), 1–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mohamud, A. (1995). (PATH) (Female genital mutilation). Personal communication.

  33. Population Action International (1994).Questions and Answers on Female Genital Mutilation (information page) (unpublished).

  34. Gilbert, D. (1993). Female genital mutilation: for the sake of purity (and control).Links 9(5), 6–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rich, S. (1995). (Wallace Global Fund) (Female genital mutilation). Personal communication, 16 October.

  36. McSwiney, M.M. and Saunders, P.R. (1992). Female circumcision: a risk factor in postpartum haemorrhage.Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 38(3), 136–137.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Eltahawy, M. (1995).Egyptian Rights Activists Sue Over FGM, Reuters Ltd (Compulserve News Service).

  38. Ghalwash, M. (1995).Egypt—FGM, Associated Press (Compulserve News Service).

  39. Ezzat, D. (1995). Female genital mutilation: promise compromised.Populi 22(5–6), 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kiragu, K. (1995). Female genital multilation: a reproductive health concern.Population Reports Supplement, Meeting the Needs of Young Adults, Series J. 41(XXIII), 3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical and Health Education, Rivers State College of Education, PMB 5047, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

    L. A. Briggs

Authors
  1. L. A. Briggs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Briggs, L.A. Female circumcision in nigeria: Is it not time for government intervention?. Health Care Anal 6, 14–23 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678072

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678072

Keywords

Search

Navigation