Mapping conversations about land use: How modern farmers practice individuality | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 12, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1757-1952
  • E-ISSN: 1757-1960

Abstract

In this article, drawing on the discursive psychology of Rom Harré, we show how mapping the exchange of words among people might disclose a complex reality; not merely that which farmers explicitly talk ‘about’ but the reality implicitly at stake within the communication. More specifically, we show how discourses involving modern farmers reveal an underlying placing in an abstract space, having sub-spaces defined by the life-orientation, sense of self and according self-positioning of modern people. In this way, we construct a road map of a set of ‘individualities’ characterizing the life of modern farmers: an individuality of citizenship, an individuality of geographies and an individuality of experience. Consequently, farmers face the problem that this multiplicity of individuality prevents them from communicating, as we will call it, univocally in the public by contrast to the univocal voices of other established social groups. We will analyse the structure of that problem by viewing diverse relations between the authority and the authenticity of different partners in the conversation on land use.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ejpc_00025_1
2021-06-01
2024-05-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brock, S.. ( 2019;), ‘ The social philosophy of Harré as a philosophy of culture. ’, in B. A. Christensen. (ed.), The Second Cognitive Revolution: A Tribute to Rom Harré, Cham:: Springer;, pp. 5362.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Christensen, A. A.. ( 2013;), ‘ Mastering the land: Mapping and metrologies in Aotearoa New Zealand. ’, in E. Pawson, and T. Brooking. (eds), Making a New Land, Dunedin:: University of Otago Press;, pp. 31027.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Elias, N.. ( [1937] 2000), The Civilizing Process, Oxford:: Blackwell;.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gómez-Benito, C., and Lozano, C.. ( 2014;), ‘ Constructing food citizenship: Theoretical premises and social practices. ’, Italian Sociological Review, 4:2, pp. 13556.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Harré, R., and van Langenhove, L.. (eds) ( 1999), Positioning Theory, Oxford:: Blackwell;.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Jopke, C.. ( 2010), Citizenship and Immigration, Cambridge:: Polity Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Langenhove, L. V.. (ed.) ( 2010;), ‘ Part III: Persons as discursive realizations. ’, in People and Societies: Rom Harré and Designing the Social Sciences, Abingdon:: Routledge;, pp. 153228.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Meeus, J. H. A.. ( 1995;), ‘ Pan-European landscapes. ’, Landscape and Urban Planning, 31:1–3, pp. 5779.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment ( 2005), Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis, Washington, DC:: Island Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Primdahl, J.,, Kristensen, L. S., and Busck, A. G.. ( 2013;), ‘ The farmer and landscape management: Different roles, different policy approaches: The farmer as a landscape manager. ’, Geography Compass, 7:4, pp. 30014.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Toulmin, S.. ( [1953] 1957), The Philosophy of Science, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Brock, Steen,, Christensen, Andreas Aagaard,, Hansen, Line Block,, Graversgaard, Morten,, Vejre, Henrik,, Dalgaard, Tommy,, Piil, Kristoffer, and Andersen, Peter Stubkjær. ( 2021;), ‘ Mapping conversations about land use: How modern farmers practice individuality. ’, Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 12:1, pp. 517, https://doi.org/10.1386/ejpc_00025_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/ejpc_00025_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/ejpc_00025_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error