Skip to main content
Log in

Women's Voices: Prenatal Diagnosis and Care for the Disabled

  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development and implementation of prenataldiagnosis has changed the experience of pregnancy for many women. How women make decisions about prenatal diagnosis PD is an important question that challenges us both individually and as a community. The questionof care is central to many women's decision-making process. How much care a child will require, how much care a woman feels confident to provide, and the level of care available for children with genetic conditionsand families from their communities all impact on women's decisions to undertake prenatal diagnosis as well as how to use the information available from testing. Interviews with women making these decisions explored, among otherthings, the role that caring and access to care played in women's ethical deliberations. Before PD can widen women's reproductive choices and counter criticisms that its use is eugenically oriented, the central role that provision of, and access to, care holds for participants in PD programmes must be acknowledged and addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baier, A. (1993) What Do Women Want in a Moral Theory. In: M.J. Larrabee (Ed.), An Ethic of Care: Feminist and Interdisciplinary Perspectives. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, L. (1994) The Politics of Prenatal Testing and Selective Abortion. Sexuality and Disability 12(2), 135-153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, A. (1994) Women's Experience of Routine Prenatal Ultrasound. Healthsharing Women 5 (3&4), 1-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. (1990) Genetics, Ethics and Audit. The Lancet 335, 1145-1147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershey, L. (1994) Choosing Disability. Ms, July-August, 26-32.

  • Kaplan, D. (1994) Disability Rights Perspectives on Reproductive Technologies and Public Policy. In: A.M. Jaggar (Ed.), Living with Contradictions: Controversies in Feminist Social Ethics. Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, A. (1989) Prenatal Diagnosis: Reproductive Choice? Reproductive Control? In: C. Overall (Ed.), The Future of Reproduction. Toronto: The Women's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muecke, L.N. (1992) Prenatal Screening for Neural Tube Defects: A Choice For All. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 36(1), Autumn, 87-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overall, C. (1987) Ethics and Human Reproduction. Boston: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, S. (1992) Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackley, P., McGuire, A., Boyd, P.A. et al. (1993) An Economic Appraisal of Alternative Prenatal Screening Programmes for Down's Syndrome. Journal of Public Health Medicine 15(2), 175-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J.C. (1993) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertz, D. (1992) Ethical and Legal Implications of the New Genetics: Issues for Discussion. Social Sciences and Medicine 35(4), 495-505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarborough, M., Scott, J.A. and Dixon, L.K. (1989) The Role of Beneficence in Clinical Genetics: Non-directive Counselling Reconsidered. Theoretical Medicine 10, 139-149.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brookes, A. Women's Voices: Prenatal Diagnosis and Care for the Disabled. Health Care Analysis 9, 133–150 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011369917884

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011369917884

Navigation