Skip to main content
Log in

A Qualitative Exploration of a Clinical Ethicist’s Role and Contributions During Family Meetings

  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the interpersonal nature of family meetings and the frequency in which they occur, the clinical ethics literature is devoid of any rich descriptions of what clinical ethicists should actually be doing during family meetings. Here, we propose a framework for describing and understanding “transitioning” facilitation skills based on a retrospective review of our internal documentation of 100 consecutive cases (June 01, 2013–December 31, 2014) wherein a clinical ethicist facilitated at least one family meeting. The internal documents were analyzed using qualitative methodologies, i.e., “codes”, to identify emergent themes. We identified four different transitioning strategies clinical ethicists use to reach a meaningful resolution. These transitioning strategies serve as a jumping-off point for additional analyses, future research, evaluating clinical ethics consultation, and overall performance improvement of a consultation service.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agich, G. J. (2009). Why quality is addressed so rarely in clinical ethics consultation. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 18(4), 339–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASBH. (2011). Core competencies for healthcare ethics consultation (2nd ed.). Glenview: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. T., DeRenzo, E. G., & Schwartz, J. (2008). Surrogate decision making: Reconciling ethical theory and clinical practice. Annals of Internal Medicine, 149(1), 48–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, C. R., Smith, M. L., Hizlan, S., & Sharp, R. R. (2011). A systematic review of activities at a high-volume ethics consultation service. The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 22(2), 151–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, C. R., Smith, M. L., Tawose, O. M., & Sharp, R. R. (2014). Practical guidance for charting ethics consultations. HEC Forum, 26(1), 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, J. R., Engelberg, R. A., Wenrich, M. D., Nielsen, E. L., Shannon, S. E., Treece, P. D., et al. (2002). Studying communication about end-of-life care during the ICU family conference: Development of a framework. Journal of Critical Care, 17(3), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, J. R., Engelberg, R. A., Wenrich, M. D., Shannon, S. E., Treece, P. D., & Rubenfeld, G. D. (2005). Missed opportunities during family conferences about end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 171(8), 844–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, J. R., & White, D. B. (2008). Practical guidance for evidence-based ICU family conferences. Chest, 134(4), 835–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubler, N. N., & Liebman, C. B. (2011). Bioethics mediation: A guide to shaping shared solutions, revised and expanded edition. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lautrette, A., Darmon, M., Megarbane, B., Joly, L. M., Chevret, S., Adrie, C., et al. (2007). A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. The New England Journal of Medicine, 356(5), 469–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neergaard, M. A., Olesen, F., Andersen, R. S., & Sondergaard, J. (2009). Qualitative description—The poor cousin of health research? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9, 52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schenker, Y., Crowley-Matoka, M., Dohan, D., Tiver, G. A., Arnold, R. M., & White, D. B. (2012). I don’t want to be the one saying “we should just let him die”: Intrapersonal tensions experienced by surrogate decision makers in the ICU. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27(12), 1657–1665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2002). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zier, L. S., Sottile, P. D., Hong, S. Y., Weissfield, L. A., & White, D. B. (2012). Surrogate decision makers’ interpretation of prognostic information: A mixed-methods study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 156(5), 360–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Courtenay R. Bruce.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bruce, C.R., Bibler, T.M., Pena, A.M. et al. A Qualitative Exploration of a Clinical Ethicist’s Role and Contributions During Family Meetings. HEC Forum 28, 283–299 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-015-9300-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-015-9300-x

Keywords

Navigation