Skip to main content
Log in

Data utilization through case-wise analysis: Some key interactions

  • Feature Articles
  • Published:
Knowledge in Society

Abstract

An earlier experiment demonstrated that the case-wise form of data analysis and presentation can improve the utilization, assimilation, recall, and recognition of poverty data in a priority setting task. As an alternative to the conventional variable-wise form, the case-wise form defines and identifies qualitatively distinct types of cases through cluster analysis. This paper reports on housing experiments designed to replicate the earlier results. However, the housing experiments unexpectedly dislosed some key interactions among task descriptions, policy preconceptions, and data presentations, including their forms. These interactions qualify and broaden the earlier results but corroborate the underlying theoretical model. They also clarify practical means of increasing the return on the public's investment in data resources to improve policy decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Breyer, J.M., & Trice, H.M. (1982). The utilization process: A conceptual framework and synthesis of empirical findings.Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 591–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R.D. (1983). Case-wise policy analysis: Another look at the burden of high energy costs.Policy Sciences, 16, 97–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R.D. (1986). Case-wise policy information systems: Redefining poverty.Policy Sciences, 19, 201–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R.D. (1987). The principle of proximal similarity.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 9, 145–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R.D., Fitch, J.S., Grassia, J., Kathlene, L., & Hammond, K.R. (1987). Improving data utilization: The case-wise alternative.Policy Sciences, 20, 365–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • deNeufville, J.I. & Barton, S.E. (1987). Myths and the definition of policy problems: An exploration of home ownership and public-private partnerships.Policy Sciences, 20, 181–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dery, D. (1984).Problem definition in policy analysis. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, W.N. (1988). Methods of the second type: Coping with the wilderness of conventional policy analysis.Policy Studies Review, 7 (Summer), pp. 720–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M. (1977).Political language: Words that succeed and politics that fail. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilsinan, J.F., & Volpe, L.C. (1984). Do not cry wolf until you are sure: The manufactured crisis in evaluation research.Policy Sciences, 17, 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. (1963).American ethics and public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M.M. (1983). Working knowledge.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 5, 193–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H.D. (1960). The structure and function of communications in society. In W. Schramm (Ed.)Mass Communications (pp. 117–130). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H.D. & Kaplan, A. (1950).Power and society. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann, W. (1965).Public opinion. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medin, D.L. & Smith, E.E. (1984). Concepts and concept formation.Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 113–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L.T., & Phillips, K.B. (1984). Research, politics, and the dynamics of policy development: A case study of motor carrier regulatory reform.Policy Sciences, 17, 364–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rein, M. (1976).Social science and public policy. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch, & B.B. Lloyd (Eds.)Cognition and categorization, (pp. 27–47). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E., Simpson, C., Miller, R.S. (1976). Structural bases of typicality effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 491–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D.A. (1979). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In A. Ortony (Ed.)Metaphors and thought (pp. 254–283). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R.R. (1974). Classification: Purposes, principles, progress, prospects.Science, 185, 1115–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1986). A poverty of distinction: From economic homogeneity to cultural heterogeneity in the classification of poor people.Policy Sciences, 19, 163–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T-upversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extentional vs. intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.Psychological Review, 90, 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R.D. (1982). Measuring the need for low-income income energy assistance. In H.H. Landsberg (Ed.)High Energy Costs: Assessing the Burden (p. 121–125). Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Ronald Brunner is professor of political science at the University of Colorado at Boulder. Lyn Kathlene is a Ph.D. candidate in political science at the University of Colorado at Boulder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brunner, R.D., Kathlene, L. Data utilization through case-wise analysis: Some key interactions. Knowledge in Society 2, 16–38 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687219

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687219

Keywords

Navigation