Abstract
The purpose of the present article is to argue against the minimalist theory of social responsibility (i.e., that the sole responsibility of business is to maximize profit in conformity with law), particularly as it is advanced by Butler D. Shaffer. Against this view, I argue that such a theory does not necessarily support or achieve greater levels of corporate efficiency than does a more demanding theory of social responsibility, and that the argument for the former view is no more valueneutral than for the latter. Finally, I argue that Shaffer fails to show that the more maximal theory demands too much from executives and is too unclear to be applicable to their decision-making.
Similar content being viewed by others
Additional information
James J. Brummer is Assistant Professor at the University of Wisconsin — Eau Claire, and at the University of Wisconsin — Stout.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brummer, J.J. In defense of social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 2, 111–122 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381702
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381702