Abstract
Increasing recognition of adverse events in health care is wide spread. Implementing improved system arrangements, which prevent adverse events taking place rather than focussing on individual culpability is increasingly being recognised as a more effective preventative strategy. But does such a perspective mean individual health practitioners remain accountable for their practice? This article explores the philosophical, psychological and professional contradictions inherent in attempting to understand where the responsibility for our actions lies and concludes by arguing that while the case for the system approach to adverse event reduction is strong, the notion of individual professional culpability needs to be maintained.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Australian Medical Association. (2005). National code of practice—hours of work, shiftwork and rostering for hospital doctors. Kingston: Australian Medical Association.
Bauman, Z. (2004). Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Berwick, D. M. (2001). Not again!. British Medical Journal, 322, 247–248.
Blackburn, S. (2005). The oxford dictionary of philosophy. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bryant, R. (2004). Nursing culpability: A proposal for change in nursing regulation. Journal of Law and Medicine, 11, 341–350.
Bryant R. (2005). Regulation, roles and competency development. Issue Paper 1. The global nursing review initiative. Geneva: International Council of Nurses.
Bullock, A., Stallybrass, O., & Trombley, S. (Eds.). (1988). The fontana dictionary of modern thought. Hammersmith: Fontana Press.
Cheney, F. (1990). The ASA closed claims study after the pulse oximeter: A preliminary look. American Society of Anaesthesiologists Newsletter, 54, 10–11.
Christenson, J. F., Levinson, W., & Dunn, P. M. (1992). The heart of darkness: the impact of perceived mistakes on physicians. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 7, 424.
Commonwealth of Australia. (2003a). Safe staffing: Discussion paper. Canberra: Australian Council for Safety and Quality in Health Care.
Commonwealth of Australia. (2003b). Patient safety: Towards sustainable improvement. Canberra: Australian Council for Safety and Quality in Health Care.
Cook, R., & Rasmussen, J. (2005). “Going Solid”: A model of system dynamics and consequences for patient safety. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 14, 130–134.
Cuypers, S. (2004). Critical thinking, autonomy and practical reason. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 38, 75–90.
Danaher, G., Schirato, T., & Webb, J. (2000). Understanding Foucault. St Leonards: Allen and Unwin.
Davies, C. (2004). Regulating the health care workforce: next steps for research. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 9(1), 55–61.
Davis, M. (1996). Professional autonomy: A framework for empirical research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6, 441–460.
Elster, J. (1999). Alchemies of the mind, rationality and the emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Emmett, S., & Ranson, D. (2003). Medication errors: Inadvertent administration of potassium chloride. Journal of Law and Medicine, 11, 146–147.
General Purpose Standing Committee No.2. (2004). Complaints handling within NSW health. Sydney: New South Wales Parliament.
Graddy, E. (1991). Interest groups or the public interest—why do we regulate health occupations? Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 16, 26.
Johnson, T. (1997). Professions and power. London and Basingstoke: The MacMillan Press Ltd.
Kohn, L., Corrigan, J., & Donaldson, M. (Eds.). (2000). To err is human building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Leape, L. (1994). Error in medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272, 1851.
Leape, L., & Berwick, D. (2005). Five years after to err is human what have we learned? Journal of the American Medical Association, 293, 2384–2390.
Mirvis, D. (1993). Physicians’autonomy—the relation between public and professional expectations. The New England Journal of Medicine, 328, 1346–1349.
Peden, M., Scurfield, R., Sleet, D., Mohan, D., Hyder, A., Jarawan, E., & Mathers, C. (2004). World report on road traffic injury prevention. Geneva: World Health Organisation.
Perrow, C. (1999) Normal accidents: Living with high risk technologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Pink, T. (2004). Free will. a very sort introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Priest, S. (2001). Freedom. In S. Priest (Ed.), Jean Paul Sartre: Basic writings (pp. 177–190). London: Routledge.
Reason, J. (1990). Human error. Cambridge: University Press Cambridge.
Reason, J. (1997). Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Hampshire: Ashgate.
Reason, J. (2000). Human error: Models and management. British Medical Journal, 320, 768–770.
Roberts, R. (2003). An essay in aid of moral psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rogers, A., Hwang, W-T., Scott, L., Aiken, L., & Dinges, D. (2004). The working hours of hospital staff nurses and patient safety. Health Affairs, 23, 202–212.
Rogers v. Whitaker (1992) HCA 58; 175 CLR 479 F.C. 92/045.
Safety and Quality Council. (2004). Australia’s first patient safety research centre announced. Canberra: Media Release.
Scruton, R. (2001). Kant: A very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Smith J. (2004). Shipman Inquiry—Fifth Report. www.the-shipman-inquiry.org.uk/fifth report.asp.
Strawson, G. (1998). Free will. In E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy. London: Routledge. Retrieved March 14, 2004.
TNS Social Research. (2005). Safe staffing consultation report. Canberra: Australian Council for Safety and Quality in Health Care.
Tremper, K., & Barker S. (1989). Pulse oximetry. Anaesthesiology, 70, 98–108.
Wachter, R. (2004). The end of the beginning: patient safety five years after ‘to err is human’. Health Affairs, 534–545.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bryant, R. Contradictions in the Concept of Professional Culpability. Health Care Anal 15, 137–152 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-007-0049-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-007-0049-5