Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior and Positive Leader–Employee Relationships

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unethical pro-organizational behaviors (UPB) are unethical, but prosocially-motivated, acts intended to benefit one’s organization. This study examines the extent to which employees are willing to perform UPB to benefit a liked leader. Based on social exchange theory, we hypothesized that LMX would mediate the association of interpersonal justice with UPB willingness. Moral identity and positive reciprocity beliefs were examined as moderators. Higher LMX was significantly and positively related to UPB willingness, and the indirect effect of interpersonal justice on UPB via LMX was significant and positive. These findings suggest that LMX and interpersonal justice could have a previously-unexplored dark side. Moral identity had a negative direct relationship with UPB, but it did not moderate the relationship of LMX with UPB. Thus, LMX facilitates UPB willingness even when employees are high in moral identity. LMX is associated with many positive outcomes, but our results show that high LMX may also increase willingness to perform unethical behaviors to benefit one’s leader. These results contribute to the literature by identifying a potential negative outcome associated with high LMX.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. An additional moderation on the relationship between interpersonal justice and LMX was also proposed and examined, involving the interaction between interpersonal justice and leader-member exchange-social comparison (LMXSC; Vidyarthi et al. 2010), such that higher levels of LMXSC might strengthen the relationship between justice and LMX. Results did not support the hypothesis, and in fact revealed a significant interaction in the negative direction. However, multicollinearity of the predictors was likely an issue, with Tolerance scores for uncentered predictors failing to meet the traditional .10 cutoff, and a significant correlation between justice and LMXSC of r = .32. Thus, observed results were likely not substantive, and the LMXSC variable was removed from the model..

  2. All additional moderation analyses positioning individual LMX dimensions as predictors were nonsignificant, with unstandardized coefficients ranging from − 0.01 (LMX Loyalty-Moral ID, p = 0.78) to 0.10 (LMX Loyalty-PRB, p = 0.05).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ekin Pellegrini, John Meriac, Bettina Casad, and Ellen Herrmann for their helpful inputs on this research. Partial funding for this study was provided by the University of Missouri – St. Louis Department of Psychological Sciences’ graduate research funding program.

Funding

This study was funded, in part, by the University of Missouri – St. Louis Department of Psychological Sciences graduate funding program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Will Bryant.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bryant, W., Merritt, S.M. Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior and Positive Leader–Employee Relationships. J Bus Ethics 168, 777–793 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04211-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04211-x

Keywords

Navigation