Abstract
Objectives
To compare attitudes of medical and law students toward informing a cancer patient about diagnosis and prognosis and to examine whether differences are related to different convictions about benefit or harm of information.Setting and design
Anonymous questionnaires were distributed to convenience samples of students at the University of Geneva containing four vignettes describing a cancer patient who wishes, or alternatively, who does not wish to be told the truth.Participants
One hundred and twenty seven medical students and 168 law students.Main outcome measures
Five point Likert scale of responses to the vignettes ranging from "certainly inform" to "certainly not inform" the patient.Results
All medical students and 96% of law students favoured information about the diagnosis of cancer if the patient requests it. Seventy four per cent of medical students and 82% of law students favoured informing a cancer patient about his or her prognosis (p = 0.0003). Thirty five per cent of law students and 11.7% of medical students favoured telling about the diagnosis (p = 0.0004) and 25.6% of law students and 7% of medical students favoured telling about the prognosis (p < 0.0001) even if the patient had clearly expressed his wish not to be informed. Law students indicated significantly more often than medical students reasons to do with the patient's good, legal obligations, and the physician's obligation to tell the truth, and significantly less often than medical students that their attitude had been determined predominantly by respect for the autonomous choice of the patient.Conclusion
Differences in attitudes according to the type of case and the type of studies were related to convictions about the benefit or harm to the patient caused by being given information. The self reported reasons of future physicians and future lawyers are helpful when considering means to achieve a better acceptance of patients' right to know and not to know.Free full text
Should cancer patients be informed about their diagnosis and prognosis? Future doctors and lawyers differ
Abstract
Setting and design: Anonymous questionnaires were distributed to convenience samples of students at the University of Geneva containing four vignettes describing a cancer patient who wishes, or alternatively, who does not wish to be told the truth.
Participants: One hundred and twenty seven medical students and 168 law students.
Main outcome measures: Five point Likert scale of responses to the vignettes ranging from "certainly inform" to "certainly not inform" the patient.
Results: All medical students and 96% of law students favoured information about the diagnosis of cancer if the patient requests it. Seventy four per cent of medical students and 82% of law students favoured informing a cancer patient about his or her prognosis (p = 0.0003). Thirty five per cent of law students and 11.7% of medical students favoured telling about the diagnosis (p = 0.0004) and 25.6% of law students and 7% of medical students favoured telling about the prognosis (p < 0.0001) even if the patient had clearly expressed his wish not to be informed. Law students indicated significantly more often than medical students reasons to do with the patient's good, legal obligations, and the physician's obligation to tell the truth, and significantly less often than medical students that their attitude had been determined predominantly by respect for the autonomous choice of the patient.
Conclusion: Differences in attitudes according to the type of case and the type of studies were related to convictions about the benefit or harm to the patient caused by being given information. The self reported reasons of future physicians and future lawyers are helpful when considering means to achieve a better acceptance of patients' right to know and not to know.
Full Text
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Cassileth BR, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K, March V. Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med. 1980 Jun;92(6):832–836. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Noone I, Crowe M, Pillay I, O'Keeffe ST. Telling the truth about cancer: views of elderly patients and their relatives. Ir Med J. 2000 Jun;93(4):104–105. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Seo M, Tamura K, Shijo H, Morioka E, Ikegame C, Hirasako K. Telling the diagnosis to cancer patients in Japan: attitude and perception of patients, physicians and nurses. Palliat Med. 2000 Mar;14(2):105–110. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Pimentel FL, Ferreira JS, Vila Real M, Mesquita NF, Maia-Gonçalves JP. Quantity and quality of information desired by Portuguese cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 1999 Nov;7(6):407–412. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- FITTS WT, Jr, RAVDIN IS. What Philadelphia physicians tell patients with cancer. J Am Med Assoc. 1953 Nov 7;153(10):901–904. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- OKEN D. What to tell cancer patients. A study of medical attitudes. JAMA. 1961 Apr 1;175:1120–1128. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Novack DH, Plumer R, Smith RL, Ochitill H, Morrow GR, Bennett JM. Changes in physicians' attitudes toward telling the cancer patient. JAMA. 1979 Mar 2;241(9):897–900. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Thomsen OO, Wulff HR, Martin A, Singer PA. What do gastroenterologists in Europe tell cancer patients? Lancet. 1993 Feb 20;341(8843):473–476. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Dalla-Vorgia P, Katsouyanni K, Garanis TN, Touloumi G, Drogari P, Koutselinis A. Attitudes of a Mediterranean population to the truth-telling issue. J Med Ethics. 1992 Jun;18(2):67–74. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Akabayashi A, Kai I, Takemura H, Okazaki H. Truth telling in the case of a pessimistic diagnosis in Japan. Lancet. 1999 Oct 9;354(9186):1263–1263. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Hosaka T, Awazu H, Fukunishi I, Okuyama T, Wogan J. Disclosure of true diagnosis in Japanese cancer patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1999 May-Jun;21(3):209–213. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Horikawa N, Yamazaki T, Sagawa M, Nagata T. Changes in disclosure of information to cancer patients in a general hospital in Japan. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2000 Jan-Feb;22(1):37–42. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Akabayashi A, Fetters MD, Elwyn TS. Family consent, communication, and advance directives for cancer disclosure: a Japanese case and discussion. J Med Ethics. 1999 Aug;25(4):296–301. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Ost DE. The 'right' not to know. J Med Philos. 1984 Aug;9(3):301–312. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Whitney SN, Spiegel D. The patient, the physician, and the truth. Hastings Cent Rep. 1999 May-Jun;29(3):24–25. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Temmerman M, Ndinya-Achola J, Ambani J, Piot P. The right not to know HIV-test results. Lancet. 1995 Apr 15;345(8955):969–970. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Buchanan Allen. Medical paternalism. Philos Public Aff. 1978 Summer;7(4):370–390. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Lantos J. Informed consent. The whole truth for patients? Cancer. 1993 Nov 1;72(9 Suppl):2811–2815. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Silverman WA. The myth of informed consent: in daily practice and in clinical trials. J Med Ethics. 1989 Mar;15(1):6–11. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Fried TR, Stein MD, O'Sullivan PS, Brock DW, Novack DH. Limits of patient autonomy. Physician attitudes and practices regarding life-sustaining treatments and euthanasia. Arch Intern Med. 1993 Mar 22;153(6):722–728. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Holland JC, Geary N, Marchini A, Tross S. An international survey of physician attitudes and practice in regard to revealing the diagnosis of cancer. Cancer Invest. 1987;5(2):151–154. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Brewin TB. Truth, trust, and paternalism. Lancet. 1985 Aug 31;2(8453):490–492. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Novack DH, Detering BJ, Arnold R, Forrow L, Ladinsky M, Pezzullo JC. Physicians' attitudes toward using deception to resolve difficult ethical problems. JAMA. 1989 May 26;261(20):2980–2985. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Blackhall LJ, Murphy ST, Frank G, Michel V, Azen S. Ethnicity and attitudes toward patient autonomy. JAMA. 1995 Sep 13;274(10):820–825. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Wiggins S, Whyte P, Huggins M, Adam S, Theilmann J, Bloch M, Sheps SB, Schechter MT, Hayden MR. The psychological consequences of predictive testing for Huntington's disease. Canadian Collaborative Study of Predictive Testing. N Engl J Med. 1992 Nov 12;327(20):1401–1405. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Horikawa N, Yamazaki T, Sagawa M, Nagata T. The disclosure of information to cancer patients and its relationship to their mental state in a consultation-liaison psychiatry setting in Japan. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1999 Sep-Oct;21(5):368–373. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Vincent JL. European attitudes towards ethical problems in intensive care medicine: results of an ethical questionnaire. Intensive Care Med. 1990;16(4):256–264. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group
Full text links
Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.28.4.258
Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall: https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/28/4/258.full.pdf
Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Article citations
Mothers' preferences toward breaking bad news about their children cancer.
J Family Med Prim Care, 7(3):596-600, 01 May 2018
Cited by: 3 articles | PMID: 30112316 | PMCID: PMC6069657
Primary care physicians and oncologists are partners in cancer announcement.
Support Care Cancer, 24(6):2473-2479, 14 Dec 2015
Cited by: 6 articles | PMID: 26667626
Future Saudi doctors and cancer patients agree cancer patients should be informed about their cancer.
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol, 9(4):342-348, 15 May 2013
Cited by: 2 articles | PMID: 23672291
Patient perceptions of oncologist-patient communication about prognosis: changes from initial diagnosis to cancer recurrence.
Health Commun, 26(1):48-58, 01 Jan 2011
Cited by: 17 articles | PMID: 21218304 | PMCID: PMC10065377
Mapping the information resources available to patients with colorectal cancer.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl), 19(4):492-500, 20 Aug 2009
Cited by: 3 articles | PMID: 19702698
Go to all (17) article citations
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
[The origin of informed consent].
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital, 25(5):312-327, 01 Oct 2005
Cited by: 20 articles | PMID: 16602332
Whose information is it anyway? Informing a 12-year-old patient of her terminal prognosis.
J Med Ethics, 31(7):427-434, 01 Jul 2005
Cited by: 1 article | PMID: 15994366 | PMCID: PMC1734176
Terminally ill patients and Jehovah's Witnesses: teaching acceptance of patients' refusals of vital treatments.
Med Educ, 36(5):479-488, 01 May 2002
Cited by: 12 articles | PMID: 12028399
Not telling the truth: circumstances leading to concealment of diagnosis and prognosis from cancer patients.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl), 19(5):589-593, 03 Dec 2009
Cited by: 38 articles | PMID: 20030693
Review
[Are schizophrenic patients being told their diagnosis today in France?]
Encephale, 43(2):160-169, 29 Jun 2016
Cited by: 1 article | PMID: 27372353
Review