Abstract
Galileo’s last publication, his Discorsi e dimostrazioni matematiche intorno a due nuove scienze attenenti alla mecanica & i movimenti locali (1638), is widely considered to be one of the most influential contributions of early modern science to the emergence of classical physics. As the title of Galileo’s book indicates, he himself claimed to have established “two new sciences,” including a new science of motion which, from the perspective of classical physics, indeed turned the Aristotelean theory of motion, which had prevailed for hundreds of years, into an obscure medieval relic.
The following considerations have been inspired by vivid discussions in the context of the Amsterdam workshop on the reception of the Galilean science of motion in Europe and constitute a preliminary attempt to deal with preconditions of reception within the framework of historical epistemology. These discussions have been continued at the Eurosymposium 2001 on Galileo in Tenerife. A somewhat modified version of the present paper has therefore also been published in the proceedings of this conference (cf. Büttner e.a. “Traces of an Invisible Giant).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
See Shirley, Thomas Harriot.
See Elkana, “Experiment.
See Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro ] , I, pp. 215 ff.
See ibid., I, pp. 187 ff. and ibid., vIII, p. 313.
See Wohlwill, Galilei und sein Kampf and Drake, Galileo at Work.
See Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro], I, pp. 22–177; Wallace, Galileo’s Logical Treatises and Wallace, Galileo’s Early Notebooks.
See Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro], I, pp. 243–419; Fredette, Les De Motu “plus anciens,”; Fredette, ”Galileo’s De motu antiquiora.” and Giusti, “Elements.
See Benedetti, Diversarum speculationum liber and Del Monte, Meditatiunculae, p. 41.
See Valleriani, “A View on Galileo’s Ricordi autografi:’
See Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro], II, pp. 7–191, 203–253, 335–510.
See ibid., pp. 193–202, 203–253.
See Galilei, Notes on Mechanics, Firenze, Ms. Gal. 72, fol. 154r°. Galileo’s idea of a tidal theory is also documented in notes from the year 1595 that are found in a notebook of Paolo Sarpi; see Sarpi, Pensieri [Cozzi & Sosio], pp. 424–427, n. 569, 57o and 571; see also the discussion in Renn e.a., “Hunting the White Elephant’:
See Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro], y, pp. 371–395.
See Galilei, Notes on Mechanics, Firenze, Ms. Gal. 72, fol. 134, 135 and 146.
See Hill, “Pendulums and Planes’:
See the letter to Belisario Vinta, May 7,161o, Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro], x, pp. 348–353.
See e.g. Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro], vIIII, pp. 571–587.
See Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro], y, pp. 415–425.
See Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro], vI, pp. 627–647.
See Renn e.a., “Hunting the White Elephant.”
See Renn e.a., “Galileo and the Challenge:’
See Damerow e.a., Exploring the Limits, also for the following.
For Descartes see Gaukroger, Descartes; for Galileo see Wallace, Prelude to Galileo.
See Benedetti, Diversarum speculationum liber; Del Monte, Meditatiunculae de rebus mathematici ca. 1587–1592, Paris, Ms. Lat. 10246, fol. 41; Beeckman, Journal [De Waard] and Harriot, London, Add Ms 6788, fol. 144–148.
See Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro], I, pp. 367–408.
See ibid., pp. 247–340.
See ibid., pp. 418–419.
From Pseudo-Aristotle via Thabit ibn Qurra to Jordanus, see Aristotle, Minor works [Hett] and Moody e.a. (eds.), The Medieval Science of Weights.
See Del Monte, Mechanicorum liber and Le mechaniche [Pigafetta] .
See Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro], II, pp. 146–191.
See Renn e.a., “Hunting the White Elephant.”
See Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro], xIx, pp. 597–646 and Drake, Galileo at Work.
See Büttner e.a., “The Challenging Images of Artillery.”
See Galilei, Notes on Mechanics, Firenze, Ms. Gal. 72, fol. 193r°. An electronic representation of Galileo’s notes on motion is freely accessible from the website of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, http://www.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de.
See Galilei, Notes on Mechanics, Firenze, Ms. Gal. 72, fol. 166r° and Hill, “Pendulums and Planes.
See the letter to Guidobaldo dal Monte, November 29, 1602, Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro], x, pp. 97–100.
For a treatment of the pendulum in the Discorsi see e.g., Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro], vIII, pp. 139 ff.
See Baliani, De motu naturali [1638] and the revised and substantially extended edition Baliani, De motu naturali [1646].
Firenze, Ms. Gal. 74, fol. 35v° ff. Galileo intended to publish this proof in the second edition of the Discorsi as can be inferred from a hand written marginal note in his personal copy of the first edition of the work (Firenze, Ms. Gal. 79, fol. 62r°).
See Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro] , II, pp. 203–255.
See the letter to Johannes Kepler, August 4, 1597, [Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro] , x, pp. 67 ff.
See Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro], xix, p. 120.
See the letter to Jacopo Mazzoni, May 30, 1597, Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro], II, pp. 193–202.
See Galilei, Notes on Mechanics, Firenze, Ms. Gal. 72, fol. 154r°.
See Galilei, Notes on Mechanics, Firenze, Ivs. Gal. 72, fol. 134,135 and 146. For a detailed account of Galileo’s cosmogony see Büttner, “Galileo’s Cosmogony.”
See Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro], vII, pp. 44–45, 53–54 and ibid., vIII, pp. 283 ff.
See Biagioli, Galileo, Courtier.
See Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro], vI, pp. 627–647.
See the letter to BelisarioVinta, May 7,161o, Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro], x, pp. 348–353.
Bonaventura Cavalieri to Galileo, August 31, 1632, Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro], xIv, pp. 378.
Galileo to Cesare Marsili, September 11, 1632, Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro], xIv, pp. 386.
Bonaventura Cavalieri to Galileo, September 21, 1632, Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro], xIv, p.395; see also the discussion of this correspondence in Wohlwill, “I)ie Entdeckung.”
Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro], xIv, p. 395
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Büttner, J., Damerow, P., Renn, J. (2004). Galileo’s Unpublished Treatises. In: Palmerino, C.R., Thijssen, J.M.M.H. (eds) The Reception of the Galilean Science of Motion in Seventeenth-Century Europe. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 239. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2455-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2455-9_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6658-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2455-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive