Time, Leeway, and the Laws of Nature: Why Humean Compatibilists Cannot Be Eternalists

References

Armstrong, D. 1983. What Is a Law of Nature? New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316499030Search in Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. 1993. “A World of States of Affairs.” Philosophical Perspectives 7: 429–40.10.2307/2214133Search in Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. 1997. A World of States of Affairs. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511583308Search in Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. 2004. Truth and Truthmakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511487552Search in Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. 2010. Sketch for a Systematic Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199590612.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Balashov, Y. 2000. “Persistence and Space-Time: Philosophical Lessons of the Pole and the Barn.” The Monist 83: 321–40.10.5840/monist200083323Search in Google Scholar

Beebee, H. 2000. “The Non-Governing Conception of Laws of Nature.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61: 571–94.10.2307/2653613Search in Google Scholar

Beebee, H. 2003. “Local Miracle Compatibilism.” Noûs 37: 258–77.10.1111/1468-0068.00438Search in Google Scholar

Beebee, H., and A. Mele. 2002. “Humean compatibilism.” Mind 111: 201–23.10.1093/mind/111.442.201Search in Google Scholar

Belnap, N. 1992. “Branching Space-Time.” Synthese 92: 385–434.10.1007/BF00414289Search in Google Scholar

Berofsky, B. 2012. Natures’s Challenge to Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199640010.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Broad, C. 1923. Scientific Thought. London: Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, J. 2005. “Compatibilist Alternatives.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35: 387–406.10.1080/00455091.2005.10716595Search in Google Scholar

Chakravartty, A. 2007. A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511487354Search in Google Scholar

Clancy, S. 2013. “A Strong Compatibilist Account of Settling.” Inquiry 56: 653–65.10.1080/0020174X.2013.841053Search in Google Scholar

Clarke, R. 2014. “Agency and Incompatibilism.” Res Philosophica 91: 519–25.10.11612/resphil.2014.91.3.14Search in Google Scholar

Crisp, T. 2005. “Presentism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics, edited by M. Loux, and D. Zimmerman, 211–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199284221.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, D. 1963. “Actions, Reasons, and Causes.” Journal of Philosophy 60: 685–700.10.2307/2023177Search in Google Scholar

Dretske, F. 1977. “Laws of Nature.” Philosophy of Science 44: 248–68.10.1086/288741Search in Google Scholar

Dyke, H. 2002. “McTaggart and the Truth about Time.” In Time, Reality, and Experience, edited by C. Callender, 137–52. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511550263.008Search in Google Scholar

Earman, J., and J. Roberts. 2005. “Contact with the Nomic: A Challenge for Deniers of Humean Supervenience about Laws of Nature, Part I: Humean Supervenience and Part II: The Epistemological Argument for Humean Supervenience.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71: 1–22 and 253–286.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2005.tb00428.xSearch in Google Scholar

Ellis, B. 2009. The Metaphysics of Scientific Realism. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.10.1017/UPO9781844654529Search in Google Scholar

Fara, M. 2008. “Masked Abilities and Compatibilism.” Mind 117: 843–65.10.1093/mind/fzn078Search in Google Scholar

Finch, A., and T. Warfield. 1998. “The Mind Argument and Libertarianism.” Mind 107: 515–28.10.1093/mind/107.427.515Search in Google Scholar

Hazlett, A. 2011. “How the past Depends upon the Future.” Ratio 24: 167–75.10.1111/j.1467-9329.2011.00491.xSearch in Google Scholar

Heil, J. 2003. From an Ontological Point of View. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199259747.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Heil, J. 2006. “The Legacy of Linguisticism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84: 233–44.10.1080/00048400600759043Search in Google Scholar

Heil, J. 2012. The Universe as We Find It. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199596201.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hinchliff, M. 1996. “The Puzzle of Change.” Philosophical Perspectives 10: 119–36.10.2307/2216239Search in Google Scholar

Hinchliff, M. 2000. “A Defense of Presentism in A Relativistic Setting.” Philosophy of Science 67: S575–S586.10.1086/392847Search in Google Scholar

Hume, D. 1777/1975. Enquires Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/actrade/9780198245353.book.1Search in Google Scholar

Hüttemann, A. 2014. “Scientific Practice and Necessary Connections.” Theoria: an International Journal for Theory, History, and Foundations of Science 79: 29–39.10.1387/theoria.7118Search in Google Scholar

Lehrer, K. 1980. “Preferences, Conditionals, and Freedom.” In Time and Cause: Essays Presented to Richard Taylor, edited by P. van Inwagen, 187–202. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.10.1007/978-94-017-3528-5_11Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, D. 2003. “Are We Free to Break the Laws?” In Free Will, 2nd ed, edited by G. Watson, 122–29. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Loewer, B. 1996. “Humean supervenience.” Philosophical Topics 24: 101–27.10.5840/philtopics199624112Search in Google Scholar

Lombard, L. 1979. “Events.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9: 425–60.10.1080/00455091.1979.10716261Search in Google Scholar

Markosian, N. 2004. “A Defense of Presentism.” Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 1: 47–82.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, C. 2007. The Mind in Nature. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234103.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Martin, C., and J. Heil. 1999. “The Ontological Turn.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 23: 34–60.10.1111/1475-4975.00003Search in Google Scholar

McCall, S. 1994. A Model of the Universe. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

McKay, T., and D. Johnson. 1996. “A Reconsideration of an Argument against Compatibilism.” Philosophical Topics 24: 113–22.10.5840/philtopics199624219Search in Google Scholar

McTaggart, J. 1908. “The Unreality of Time.” Mind 17: 457–74.10.1093/mind/XVII.4.457Search in Google Scholar

Molnar, G. 2003. Powers: A Study in Metaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Parsons, J. 2005. “Truthmakers, the Past, and the Future.” In Truthmakers: The Contemporary Debate, edited by H. Beebee, and J. Dodd, 161–74. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283569.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Perry, J. 2004. “Compatibilist Options.” In Freedom and Determinism, edited by J. Campbell, M. O’Rourke, and D. Shier, 231–54. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rea, M. 2001. “How to Be an Eleatic Monist.” Philosophical Perspectives 15: 129–51.10.1111/0029-4624.35.s15.7Search in Google Scholar

Read, R., and K. Richman, eds. 2000. The New Hume Debate. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Richard, M. 1981. “Temporalism and Eternalism.” Philosophical Studies 39: 1–13.10.1007/BF00354808Search in Google Scholar

Russell, P. 2008. “Hume on Free Will.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), edited by E. Zalta. URL <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/hume-freewill/>.Search in Google Scholar

Savitt, S. 2000. “There’s No Time like the Present (In Minkowski Spacetime).” Philosophy of Science 67: S563–S574.10.1086/392846Search in Google Scholar

Savitt, S. 2006. “Being and Becoming in Modern Physics.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2008 Edition), edited by E. Zalta. URL <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/spacetime-bebecome/>.Search in Google Scholar

Sellars, W. 1966. “Fatalism and Determinism.” In Freedom and Determinism, edited by K. Lehrer, 141–74. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Random House.Search in Google Scholar

Sider, T. 1999. “Presentism and Ontological Commitment.” The Journal of Philosophy 96: 325–47.10.2307/2564601Search in Google Scholar

Sider, T. 2001. Four-Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/019924443X.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Sider, T. 2005. “Traveling in A- and B-Time.” The Monist 88: 329–35.10.5840/monist200588326Search in Google Scholar

Steward, H. 2012. A Metaphysics for Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552054.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Stoneham, T. 2009. “Time and Truth: The Presentism-Eternalism Debate.” Philosophy 84: 201–18.10.1017/S0031819109000187Search in Google Scholar

Stout, R. 2002. “The Right Structure for a Causal Theory of Action.” Facta Philosophica 4: 11–24.10.5840/factaphil20024110Search in Google Scholar

Tooley, M. 1997. Time, Tense, and Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Van Inwagen, P. 1983. An Essay on Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Van Inwagen, P. 2000. “Free Will Remains a Mystery.” Philosophical Perspectives 14: 1–19.10.1017/9781316711101.009Search in Google Scholar

Vihvelin, K. 1988. “The Modal Argument for Incompatibilism.” Philosophical Studies 53: 227–44.10.1007/BF00354642Search in Google Scholar

Vihvelin, K. 2004. “Free Will Demystified: A Dispositional Account.” Philosophical Topics 32: 427–50.10.5840/philtopics2004321/211Search in Google Scholar

Vihvelin, K. 2013. Causes, Laws, and Free Will: Why Determinism Doesn’t Matter. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795185.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Widerker, D. 1987. “On an Argument for Incompatibilism.” Analysis 47: 37–41.10.1093/analys/47.1.37Search in Google Scholar