Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Real world epistemic under-determination

  • Discussion
  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Earman, J. (1992),Bayes or Bust. Cambridge: M.I.T.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J. (1993), “Under-determination, Realism, and Reason”,Midwest Studies in Philosophy 18: 19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, J. (1973), “Under-determination: Craig and Ramsey”,Journal of Philosophy 70: 453–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J. (1990), “Two Dogmas of Empiricism: The “Theory-Informity” of Observation and the Quine-Duhem Thesis”,Philosophy of Science 57: 553–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grünbaum, A. (1976), “The Duhemian Argument”, in Harding, S. (ed.),Can Theories be Refuted?, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 116–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guth, A. (1997).The Inflationary Universe. Reading Mass: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoefer, C. and Rosenberg, A. (1994), “Empirical Equivalence, Under-determination, and Systems of the World”,Philosophy of Science 61: 592–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P. (1993),The Advancement of Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klee, R. (1992), “In Defense of the Quine-Duhem Thesis: A Reply to Greenwood”,Philosophy of Science 59: 487–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. (1976), “Grnbaum on ‘The Duhemian Argument’, in Harding, S. (ed.),Can Theories be Refuted? Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. (1990), “Demystifying Under-determination” in Savage, C. (ed.),Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 14, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 266–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. and Leplin, L. (1991), “Empirical Equivalence and Underdetermination”,Journal of Philosophy 138: 449–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malament, D. (1977), “Observationally Indistinguishable Space-Times”, in Earman, J., Glymour, C. and Stachel, J (eds.),Foundations of Space-Time Theories, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol 8, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawton-Smith, W. (1980), “The Under-determination of Theory by Data” in Hilpinen, R. (ed.),Rationality in Science. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 91–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. (1990), “Contrastive Empiricism”, in Savage, C. (ed.),Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 14,. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 392–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. (1975), “On Empirically Equivalent Systems of the World”,Erkenntnis 9: 313–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. (1976), “A Comment on Grünbaum's Claim”, in Harding, S. (ed.),Can Theories be Refuted?. Dordrecht: Reidel, p. 132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. (1986), “Reply to Paul Roth”, in Hahn, L. and Schlipp, P. (eds.),The Philosophy of W.V. Quine. La Salle: Open Court, p. 459.P

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rutgers University, 08901, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA

    Martin Bunzl

Authors
  1. Martin Bunzl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bunzl, M. Real world epistemic under-determination. Philosophia 31, 139–147 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380928

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380928

Keywords

Search

Navigation