Skip to main content
Log in

Crisis, argument, and agriculture

  • Published:
Journal of agricultural ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scholarly critics such as Wendell Berry, as well as the popular media, frequently refer to problems associated with agriculture as “the agricultural crisis” or “the farm crisis.” Despite the identification of a problem or problems as symptomatic of this “crisis,” scant attention is paid to why the situation is a social crisis as opposed to a problem, tragedy, trend, or simple change in the structure of agriculture. This paper analyzes the use of “social crisis” as applied to the state of modern agriculture and, by extension, other “crises” such as those in legitimation and morality. It concludes that, although important social values associated with “farming as a way of life” may be in danger of being lost, the crisis we may be facing with respect to agriculture is more properly understood as a sociopolitical crisis that has broader implications than simply the loss of farms or traditional farming values. Indeed, what is in danger of being lost is our ability to affect a secure and sustainable political-economic system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burkhardt, J. Crisis, argument, and agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Ethics 1, 123–138 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01827030

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01827030

Keywords

Navigation