Dan L. Burk
Abstract
The theories of information ethics articulated by Luciano Floridi and his collaborators have clear implications for law. Information law, including the law of privacy and of intellectual property, is especially likely to benefit from a coherent and comprehensive theory of information ethics. This article illustrates how information ethics might apply to legal doctrine, by examining legal questions related to the ownership and control of the personal data representations, including photographs, game avatars, and consumer profiles, that have become ubiquitous with the proliferation of information and communication technologies. Recent controversy over the control of player performance statistics in "fantasy" sports leagues provides a limiting case for the analysis. Such data representations will in many instances constitute the kind of personal data that information ethics asserts constitutes an information entity. Legal doctrine in some instances proves sympathetic to such an assertion, but remains largely inchoate as to which data might constitute a given information entity in a given instance. Neither is information ethics, in its current state of development, entirely helpful in answering this critical question. While information ethics holds some promise to bring coherence to this area of the law, further work articulating a richer theory of information ethics will be necessary before it can do so.
- A. Bartow. Our Data, Ourselves: Privacy, Propertization and Gender. University of San Francisco Law Review, 34: 633-704, 2000.Google Scholar
- D. Burk. Legal Consequences of the Cyberspatial Metaphor. In M. Consalvo et al. editors, Internet Research Annual Vol. 1: Selected Papers from The Association of Internet Researchers Conferences 2000-2002, pp. 17-24. Peter Lang, 2003.Google Scholar
- D. Burk. Expression, Selection, Abstraction: Copyright's Golden Braid. Syracuse Law Review, 55: 593-618, 2005.Google Scholar
- D. Burk. Electronic Gaming and the Ethics of Information Ownership 4. International Review of Information Ethics 4, 2006a. http://www.i-r-i-e.net/inhalt/004/burk.pdf.Google Scholar
- D. Burk. Privacy and Property in the Global Datasphere. In: S. Hongladarom and C. Ess, editors, Information Technology Ethics: Cultural Perspectives, pp. 94-107, Idea Group, 2006b.Google Scholar
- D. Burk. Method and Madness in Copyright Law. Utah Law Review, 2007: 587-618, 2007.Google Scholar
- C.B.C. Distribution and Marketing, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Mass Media, L.P., 443 F. Supp. 2d 1077 (E.D. Mo. 2006).Google Scholar
- L. Floridi. Information Ethics: On the Philosophical Foundations of Computer Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 1: 37-56, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Floridi. On the Intrinsic Value of Information Objects and the Infosphere. Ethics and Information Technology, 4: 287-304, 2003. Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Floridi. The Ontological Interpretation of Informational Privacy. Ethics and Information Technology, 7: 185-200, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Floridi. Four Challenges for a Theory of Information Privacy. Ethics and Information Technology, 8: 109-119, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Floridi and J.W. Sanders. Artificial Evil and the Foundation of Computer Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 3: 55-66, 2001. Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. Gibson. Idoru. Penguin, 1996.Google Scholar
- S. Haack. On Logic in the Law: "Something but not All". Ratio Juris, 20: 1-31, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Heyman. The Birth of the Authornym: Authorship, Pseudonymity, and Trademark Law 80. Notre Dame Law Review, 80: 377, 2005.Google Scholar
- J. Malkan. Stolen Photographs: Personality, Publicity, and Privacy. Texas Law Review, 75: 779-835, 1997.Google Scholar
- M. McKenna. The Right of Publicity and Autonomous Self-Definition. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 67: 225-294, 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. McKenna. The Normative Foundations of Trademark Law. Notre Dame Law Review, 82: 1839-1916, 2007.Google Scholar
- N. Negroponte, Being Digital. Vintage Books, New York, 1995. Google Scholar
- M.J. Radin. Property and Personhood. Stanford Law Review, 34: 97-1015, 1982.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Reidenberg. Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cyberspace. Stanford Law Review, 52: 1315-1371, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Starke-Meyering, D. Burk, and L. Gurak. American Internet Users and Privacy: A Safe Harbor of Their Own? In P.E.N. Howard and S. Jones, editors, Society Online: The Internet in Context, pp. 275-294. Sage, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Swire and R. Litan, None of Your Business: World Data Flows, Electronic Commerce, and the European Privacy Directive. Brookings, Washington DC, 1998.Google Scholar
- N. Weiner. The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society, (2nd ed.). Doubleday Anchor, 1954.Google Scholar
- A.F. Westin, Privacy and Freedom. Atheneum, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Information ethics and the law of data representations
Recommendations
Epistemic Value Theory and Information Ethics
Three of the major issues in information ethics – intellectual property, speech regulation, and privacy – concern the morality of restricting people’s access to certain information. Consequently, policies in these areas have a significant impact on the ...
Floridi and Spinoza on global information ethics
Floridi's ontocentric ethics is compared with Spinoza's ethical and metaphysical system as found in the Ethics. Floridi's is a naturalistic ethics where he argues that an action is right or wrong primarily because the action does decrease the entropy' ...
Towards an ontological foundation of information ethics
The paper presents, firstly, a brief review of the long history of information ethics beginning with the Greek concept of parrhesia or freedom of speech as analyzed by Michel Foucault. The recent concept of information ethics is related particularly ...
Comments