Abstract
This chapter analyses the phenomenon of new animism in the light of the notion of cultural critique borrowed from work by anthropologists such as George Marcus and Michael Fischer. In developing the analysis, a distinction is drawn between affirmatory new animism and a critical approach to new animism. While each of these approaches acknowledges divergences between animist viewpoints and modern Western viewpoints, the affirmatory approach affirms the superiority of the animist side of the contrast; the critical approach remains more circumspect, emphasizing the hermeneutical difficulties that accompany efforts to understand the cultural phenomena at issue. The purpose of the chapter is not to vindicate either the affirmatory or the critical approach but to clarify what kind of phenomenon (or movement or orientation) new animism is, what its possibilities are and what might be the strengths and weaknesses both of new animism itself and of the criticisms that have been lodged against it.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Emerson, C. and Michael Holquist (trans.). University of Texas Press.
Banerjee, S. B., & Linstead, S. (2004). Masking subversion: Neocolonial embeddedness in anthropological accounts of indigenous management. Human Relations, 57(2), 221–247.
Bird-David, N. (1993). Tribal Metaphorization of human–nature relatedness: A comparative analysis. In D. K. Milton (Ed.), Environmentalism: The view from anthropology (pp. 112–125). Routledge.
Bird-David, N. (1999). ‘Animism’ revisited: Personhood, environment, and relational epistemology. Current Anthropology, 40, S67–S79.
Bird-David, N. (2017). Us, relatives: Scaling and plural life in a forager world. University of California Press.
Bird-David, N. (2018). Size matters! The scalability of modern hunter-gatherer animism. Quaternary International, 464(A), 305–314.
Bouissac, P. (1989). What is a human? Ecological semiotics and the new animism. Semiotica, 77(4), 497–516.
Buchanan, I. (2010). A dictionary of critical theory. Oxford University Press.
Burley, M. (2019). ‘A language in which to think of the world’: Animism, indigenous traditions, and the deprovincialization of philosophy of religion. Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory, 18(3), 466–490.
Burley, M. (2020). A radical pluralist philosophy of religion: Cross-cultural, multireligious, interdisciplinary. Bloomsbury.
Cato, H. (Ed.). (1990). The Samoa reader: Anthropologists take stock. University Press of America.
Clammer, J. (2004). The politics of animism. In J. Clammer, S. Poirier, & E. Schwimmer (Eds.), Figured worlds: Ontological obstacles in intercultural relations (pp. 83–109). University of Toronto Press.
Conklin, B. A. (2001). Consuming grief: Compassionate cannibalism in an Amazonian society. University of Texas Press.
Cox, J. L. (2007). From primitive to indigenous: The academic study of indigenous religions. Ashgate.
Curran, G. (2011). The ‘expanding domain’ of Warlpiri initiation rituals. In Y. Musharbash & M. Barber (Eds.), Ethnography and the production of anthropological knowledge: Essays in honour of Nicolas Peterson (pp. 39–50). Australian National University Press.
Viveiros de Castro, E. (1998). Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 4(3), 469–488.
Descola, P. (1992). Societies of nature and the nature of society. In A. Kuper (Ed.), Conceptualizing society (pp. 107–126). Routledge.
Eldridge, R. (1996). Is animism alive and well? In D. Z. Phillips (Ed.), Can religion be explained away? (pp. 3–25). Macmillan.
Fischer, M. M. J., & Abedi, M. (1990). Debating Muslims: Cultural dialogues in postmodernity and tradition. University of Wisconsin Press.
Freeman, D. (1999). The fateful hoaxing of Margaret Mead: A historical analysis of her Samoan research. Westview Press.
Geertz, A. W. (2004). Can we move beyond primitivism? On recovering the indigenes of indigenous religions in the academic study of religion. In J. K. Olupona (Ed.), Beyond primitivism: Indigenous religious traditions and modernity (pp. 37–70). Routledge.
Geertz, A. W. (2009). Indigenous religions: A review essay. Anthropos, 104(1), 198–202.
Hallowell, A. I. (1955). Culture and experience. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hallowell, A. I. (1960). Ojibwa ontology, behavior, and world view. In S. Diamond (Ed.), Culture in history: Essays in honor of Paul Radin (pp. 19–52). Columbia University Press.
Harvey, G. (2002). Introduction. In G. Harvey (Ed.), Readings in indigenous religions (pp. 1–14). Continuum.
Harvey, G. (2004). Response to a review in AASR bulletin 21. African Association for the Study of Religions Bulletin, 22, 38–39.
Harvey, G. (2005). Animism: Respecting the living world. Hurst.
Harvey, G. (2006). Animals, animists, and academics. Zygon, 41(1), 9–19.
Harvey, G. (2010). Animism rather than shamanism: New approaches to what shamans do (for other animists). In B. E. Schmidt & L. Huskinson (Eds.), Spirit possession and trance: New interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 16–30). Continuum.
Harvey, G. (Ed.). (2013). The handbook of contemporary animism. Acumen.
Harvey, G. (2017a). Animism: Respecting the living world (2nd ed.). Hurst.
Harvey, G. (2017b). If not all stones are alive …: Radical relationality in animism studies. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture, 11(4), 481–497.
Harvey, G. (2018). Adjusted styles of communication (ASCs) in the post-Cartesian world. In M. Astor-Aguilera & G. Harvey (Eds.), Rethinking relations and animism: Personhood and materiality (pp. 35–52). Routledge.
Ingold, T. (1988). The animal in the study of humanity. In T. Ingold (Ed.), What is an animal? (pp. 84–99). Unwin Hyman.
Ingold, T. (2006). Rethinking the animate, re-animating thought. Ethnos, 71(1), 9–20.
Ingold, T. (2016). End comment: To conclude in the spirit of rebirth, or, a note on animic anthropo-ontogenesis. In K. Århem & G. Sprenger (Eds.), Animism in Southeast Asia (pp. 302–309). Routledge.
Jakamarra, H. C. (1994). Marlujarrakurlu: The two kangaroos. In P. R. Napaljarri & L. Cataldi (Trans.), Warlpiri Dreamings and histories: Yimikirli: Newly recorded sayings from aboriginal elders of Central Australia (pp. 45–51). AltaMira Press.
Laack, I. (2020). The new animism and its challenges to the study of religion. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 32(2), 115–147.
Leube, M. (2017). A renaissance of animism: A meditation on the relationship between things and their makers. In J. Chapman (Ed.), Routledge handbook of sustainable product design (pp. 41–52). Routledge.
Lisitzky, G. (1956). Four ways of being human: An introduction to anthropology. Viking Press.
Marcus, G. E., & Fischer, M. M. J. (1999). Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Mattar, S. G. (2012). Yeats, fairies, and the new animism. New Literary History, 43(1), 137–157.
Mbiti, J. S. (1969). African religions and philosophy. Praeger.
Mead, M. (1928). Coming of age in Samoa: A psychological study of primitive youth for western civilisation. Morrow.
Morrison, K. M. (2013). Animism and a proposal for a post-Cartesian anthropology. In G. Harvey (Ed.), The handbook of contemporary animism (pp. 38–52). Durham.
Munn, N. D. (1970). The transformation of subjects into objects in Walbiri and Pitjantjatjara myth. In R. M. Berndt (Ed.), Australian aboriginal anthropology: Modern studies in the social anthropology of the Australian aborigines (pp. 141–163). University of Western Australia Press.
Peterson, N. (2011). Is the aboriginal landscape sentient? Animism, the new animism and the Warlpiri. Oceania, 81(2), 167–179.
Phillips, D. Z. (1990). The presumption of theory. In R. Gaita (Ed.), Value and understanding: Essays for Peter Winch (pp. 216–241). Routledge.
Phillips, D. Z. (2001). Religion and the hermeneutics of contemplation. Cambridge University Press.
Phillips, D. Z. (2007). Philosophy’s radical pluralism in the house of intellect – A reply to Henk Vroom. In A. F. Sanders (Ed.), D. Z. Phillips’ contemplative philosophy of religion: Questions and responses (pp. 197–211). Ashgate.
Platvoet, J. G. (2004). Beyond ‘primitivism’: ‘Indigenous religions’. African Association for the Study of Religions Bulletin, 21, 47–52.
Platvoet, J. G. (2006). On boundary hopping & ‘primitivism’: Reply to Graham Harvey. African Association for the Study of Religions Bulletin, 25, 45–48.
Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the mastery of nature. Routledge.
Robinson, E. A. (1949). Animism as a world hypothesis. Philosophical Review, 58(1), 53–63.
Shklovsky, V. (1965 [1917]). Art as technique. In L. T. Lemon, & M. J. Reis (trans.). Russian formalist criticism: Four essays (pp. 3–24). University of Nebraska Press.
Smith, T. (2020). The common consent argument for the existence of nature spirits. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 98(2), 334–348.
Stahl, G. E. (1737). Theoria medica vera: physiologiam et pathologiam (2nd ed.). Literis Orphanotrophei.
Stocking, G. W., Jr. (1987). Victorian anthropology. Free Press.
Stringer, M. D. (1999). Rethinking animism: Thoughts from the infancy of our discipline. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 5(4), 541–556.
Tylor, E. B. (1871). Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, art, and custom (Vol. 1). Murray.
von der Ruhr, M. (1996). Is animism alive and well? A response to Professor Eldridge. In D. Z. Phillips (Ed.), Can religion be explained away? (pp. 26–45). Macmillan.
Wilkinson, D. (2017). Is there such a thing as animism? Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 85(2), 289–311.
Winch, P. (1964). Understanding a primitive society. American Philosophical Quarterly, 1(4), 307–324.
Wittgenstein, L. (2009 [1953]). Philosophical investigations (4th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Acknowledgments
I am grateful to Tiddy Smith and to an anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments on a previous draft of this chapter. The section headed ‘The Concept of Cultural Critique’ is a substantially augmented reworking of material from my book A Radical Pluralist Philosophy of Religion (Burley, 2020: 57–60).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burley, M. (2023). New Animism as Cultural Critique?. In: Smith, T. (eds) Animism and Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave Frontiers in Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94170-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94170-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-94169-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-94170-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)