Skip to main content

On Integrating the Study of Evolution and of Development

  • Chapter
Integrating Scientific Disciplines

Part of the book series: Science and Philosophy ((SCPH,volume 2))

Abstract

In the early twentieth century, studies of heredity, development and evolution went in separate directions. Although there were never any wholly impassable barriers between the resultant disciplines, each developed its own terminology, groups of focal problems, and peculiar perspective. In short, development, evolution, and genetics evolved into fairly independent biological disciplines. The resultant theoretical lacunae and barriers to communication are of quite general interest. So are the numerous attempts to weld synthetic or integrative theories bridging these disciplines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bateson, William (1979). Problems of genetics. New Haven: Yale University Press. Reissue. Original 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, John (1985). An organizational interpretation of evolution. In Depew and Weber ( 1985 ), pp. 133–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depew, David and Weber, Bruce (1985). Evolution at a crossroads: The new biology and the new philosophy of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dover, Gabriel and Flavell, Richard (Eds.) (1982). Genome evolution. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunkapiller, Tim; Huang, Henry; Hood, Leroy; and Campbell, John (1982). The impact of modern genetics on evolutionary theory. In Milkman (1982), pp. 164–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. Evelyn and Rachootin, Stan (1979). Historical introduction. In Bateson (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, J. W. and Mount, D. W. (1982). The SOS regulatory system of Escherichial coll. Molecular and General Genetics, 105, 74–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, John (1978). The Evolution of sex. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, John (Ed.) (1983). Evolution now. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, John; Burian, Richard; Kauffman, Stuart; Alberch, Pere; Campbell, John; Goodwin, Brian; Lande, Russell; Raup, David; and Wolpert, Lewis (1985). Developmental constraints and evolution. Quarterly Review of Biology, 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst (1976). Behavior programs and evolutionary strategies. In Mayr, Evolution and the diversity of life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 694–711. Reprinted from American Scientist, 62, (1974), 650–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milkman, Roger (Ed.) (1982). Perspectives on evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, Masotoshi and Koehn, Richard (eds.)(1983). Evolution of genes and proteins. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapp, Jan (1984). Cytoplasmic inheritance and the struggle for authority in the field of heredity, 1891–1981. Unpublished dissertation, University of Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, George (1975). Sex and evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, K. E. von (1828). Entwicklungsgeschichte der Thiere: Beobachtung und Reflexion. Konigsberg: Borntrager.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, J. T. (1982). Evolution and Development. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, Frederick B. (1980). The modern evolutionary synthesis and the biogenetic law. In E. Mayr and W. B. Provine, eds., The evolutionary synthesis. Perspectives on the unification of biology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darden, Lindley and Maull, Nancy (1977). Interfield theories. Philosophy of Science, 44, 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer, G. R. (1930). Embryology and evolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garstang, W. (1922). The theory of recapitulation: A critical reassessment of the biogenetic law. J. Linn. Soc. Zool. 35, 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Scott (1985). The rivalry of genetics and embryology: 1920–1940. Talk presented at Summer History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Biology Conference, St. Mary’s College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, Richard (1938). Physiological genetics. New York: McGraw—Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Brian; Holder, Nigel; and Wylie, C. C. (1983). Development and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Steven J. (1977). Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, E. (1866). Generalle Morphologie der Organismen: Allgemeine Grundzuge der organischen Formen-Wissenschaft, mechanisch begrundet durch die von Charles Darwin reformirte DescendezTheorie. Berlin: Georg Reimer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hamburger, Victor (1980). Embryology and the modern synthesis in evolutionary theory. In E. Mayr and W. B. Provine, eds., The evolutionary synthesis. Perspectives on the unification of biology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maienschein, Jane (1985). Development and inheritance: Early 20th century divorce? Talk presented at

    Google Scholar 

  • Summer History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Biology Conference. St. Mary’s College. Maynard Smith, John; Burian, Richard; Kauffman, Stuart; Alberch, Pere; Campbell, John; Goodwin

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian; Lande, Russell; Raup, David; and Wolpert, Lewis (1985). Developmental constraints and evolution. Quarterly Review of Biology, 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst (1982). The growth of biological thought. Cambridge: Harvard Univerity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, T. H. (1934). Embryology and genetics. New York: Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, C. H. (1940). Organizers and genes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, C. H. (1957). The strategy of the genes. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

William Bechtel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burian, R.M. (1986). On Integrating the Study of Evolution and of Development. In: Bechtel, W. (eds) Integrating Scientific Disciplines. Science and Philosophy, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9435-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9435-1_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-3342-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-9435-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics