Skip to main content
Log in

Power influences upon technology design for age-related cognitive decline using the VSD framework

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Ethics and Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Implicit in the value sensitive design (VSD) approach is a concern for understanding, and where possible, disrupting problematic power relationships. Yet an awareness of the issues and ethics of power relations is a pre-requisite for such a concern to bear fruit. This article provides some insight into the issues, and through a case study of technology design to support care arrangements for age-related cognitive decline, illustrates how finding a satisfactory resolution can be particularly troublesome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, S. D. (2015). The process of networked civic innovation: Examining the role of values, resources, and power in community-based technology projects. Seattle: University of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerknes, G., Ehn, P., & Kyng, M. (1987). Computers and democracy: A Scandinavian challenge. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bødker, S., Ehn, P., Sjögren, D., & Sundblad, Y. (2000). Co-operative design—Perspectives on 20 years with ‘the Scandinavian IT design model. In Proceedings of NordiCHI 2000, Stockholm.

  • Brey, P. (2007). The technological construction of social power. Social Epistemology, 22(1), 71–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burmeister, O. K. (2010). Websites for seniors: Cognitive accessibility. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 8(2), 99–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burmeister, O. K. (2012). What seniors value about online community. Journal of Community Informatics, 8(1).

  • Burmeister, O. K. (2016). The development of assistive dementia technology that accounts for the values of those affected by its use. Ethics and Information Technology, 18(3), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-016-9404-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burmeister, O. K., Weckert, J., & Williamson, K. (2011). Seniors extend understanding of what constitutes universal values. Journal of Information, Communication & Ethics in Society, 9(4), 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1108/14779961111191048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, G., Huldtgren, A., Malmborg, L., Harley, D., & Ijsselsteijn, W. (2015). Design for agency, adaptivity and reciprocity: Reimagining AAL and telecare agendas. In V. Wulf, K. Schmidt & D. Randall (Eds.), Designing socially embedded technologies in the real-world (pp. 305–338). London: Springer London.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, B., Hendry, D. G., & Borning, A. (2017). A survey of value sensitive design methods. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction, 11(2), 63–125. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heusinger, M. J. (2013). Challenges of critical and emancipatory design science research: the design of ‘Possible Worlds’ as response. In 15th International conference on enterprise information systems, Angers, 04–07 July 2013 (pp. 233–239). Institute for Systems, Technologies of Information, Control, and Communication (INSTICC).

  • Kreps, D. (Ed.). (2015). Gramsci and Foucault: A Reassessment. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D., Burmeister, O. K., & Blaynee, J. (2016). Skeuomorphic reassurance: Personhood and dementia. In D. Kreps, G. Fletcher, & M. Griffiths (Eds.), Technology and intimacy: Choice or coercion: 12th IFIP TC 9 international conference on human choice and computers, HCC12 2016, Salford, UK, September 7–9, 2016, Proceedings (pp. 61–71). Cham: Springer.

  • Schikhof, Y., Mulder, I., & Choenni, S. (2010). Who will watch (over) me? Humane monitoring in dementia care. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(6), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, A. J. C. (2014). Robots and human dignity: The effects of robot care on the dignity of older people. Ethics and Information Technology, 16(1), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-014-9338-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teipel, S., Babiloni, C., Hoey, J., Kaye, J., Kirste, T., & Burmeister, O. K. (2016). Information and communication technology solutions for outdoor navigation in dementia. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association, 12(6), 695–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2015.11.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winner, L. (1986). The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver K. Burmeister.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burmeister, O.K., Kreps, D. Power influences upon technology design for age-related cognitive decline using the VSD framework. Ethics Inf Technol 23, 95–98 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9460-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9460-x

Keywords

Navigation