Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Policy schemes and targeted technologies in an extensive cereal–sheep farming system

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many commentators and experts arguethat extensive agricultural systems across theEuropean Union (EU) should be supported toreach the two main functions of the EuropeanModel of Agriculture (EMA): lively economicsystems and environmental awareness. We arguethat the main current policy instrument of theEMA, the CAP (Common Agricultural Policy),should be targeted to take advantage ofexisting regional diversity in social realitiesand agricultural structures. Community-basedresearch work has been carried out throughoutthe 1990s in the cereal–sheep farming system ofCastile-La Mancha (south-central Spain), wherea system of land-use operates in which cerealcropping and sheep farming are carried out onthe same land. Local agricultural staff andfarmers acted as collaborators in rating themain constraints and devising proposals forstructural, social, and institutional reforms.Results showed that the two social groupsinvolved (cultivators and pastoralists) haddivergent interests and unbalanced numbers forcollective action to be effective. Governmentintervention is required, but current EUagricultural policy is not accomplishing therestructuring objectives. Results of theopinion survey also support switching the EUsubsidy scheme to sheep from a per-head basisto a per-hectare basis and making grazing landmore accessible to landless shepherds. Regionalpolicy schemes should be devised that aretailored to meet the circumstances ofparticular land areas, but sensible policyschemes can only be devised after properknowledge of the structure and institutionalframework of EU agricultural systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnon I. (1992). Agriculture in Dry Lands. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayer, H. W. (1997). “Grass roots collective action: Agricultural opportunities.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 22: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E. R. (1973). Survey Research Methods. California: Wadsworth, Belmont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bello, A. (1993). “Valores Agroecológicos de la producción de pastos y forrajes en Castilla-La Mancha.” In SEEP (ed.), Actas de la 33 reunión científica de la SEEP (pp. 37–50). Ciudad Real, Spain: Sociedad Española para el Estudio de los Pastos.

    Google Scholar 

  • BMDP (1992). BMDP Statistical Software Inc. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boza, J., A. B. Robles, P. Fernández, F. F. Bermúedez, and J. L. González-Rebollar (1997). “Planificación ganadera de pastos en zonas desfavorecidas.” In SEEP (ed.), Actas de la 37 reunión científica de la SEEP (pp. 395–409). Sevilla, Spain: Sociedad Española para el Estudio de los Pastos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. W. (1998). “Property regimes in economic development: Lesson and policy implications.” In E. Lutz (ed.), Agriculture and the Environment. Perspectives in Sustainable Rural Development (pp. 83–91). A World Bank symposium. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, R, M. Arauzo, and C. Garcia (1992). “Implications of introducing sheep into the existing agricultural systems of Central Spain.” Journal of International Farm Management 1: 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, R. (1993). “An experts' survey on the role of legumes in arable cropping systems of the Mediterranean area.” Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 3: 133–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, R. and C. Garcia (1996). Cultivo y utilización de la asociación veza-cereal en Castilla-La Mancha. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, R. (1997). Cultivators-pastoralists relationships in the cereal-sheep system of Castile-La Mancha. Selection of a land-based structure for analysis and modelling. Scientific Report to the EU Commission. FAIR3-CT96-1893. Dept. of Agric. Econ., Agric. Univ. of Athens, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, R. (1999). “Castile-La Mancha: A once traditional and integrated cereal-sheep farming system under change.” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture14: 188–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, R. (2001). “Typology of cereal-sheep farming systems in Castile-laMancha (south-central Spain).” Agricultural Systems 68: 215–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correal, E. and J. A. Sotomayor (1998). “Sistemas ovino-cereal y su repercusión sobre el medio natural.” In SEEP (ed.), Actas de la 38 reunión científica de la SEEP (pp. 109–128). Soria, Spain: Sociedad Española para el Estudio de los Pastos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunha, A. (1999). “La PAC y el futuro de la agricultura europea.” In Foro Agrario (ed.), La agricultura en el umbral del siglo XXI (pp. 65–76). Madrid: Mundi Prensa.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Juana, E, C. Martín-Novella, M. A. Naveso, D. Pain, and J. Sears (1993). “Farming and birds in Spain: Threats and opportunities for conservation.” RSPB Conservation Review 7: 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • DPFRNN (1997). “Feed Seed: Foraging for an answer.” Dryland Pasture, Forage and Range Network News. Issue No. 14. Aleppo, Syria: ICARDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1999). The Common Agricultural Policy. Promoting Europe's Agriculture and Rural Areas: Continuity and Change. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publication of the EC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer, C, L. Olea, I. Delgado, G. Remmers, and M. Fernández (1995). “Presente y futuro de la explotación pascícola y forrajera en zonas marginales.” Pastos 25: 321–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fundación BBV (1999). Renta Nacional de España. Bilbao, Spain: Fundación BBV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayami, Y. and V. W. Ruttan (1971). Agricultural Development: An International Perspective. Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazell, P. and E. Lutz (1998). “Integrating environmental and sustainability concerns into rural development policies.” In E. Lutz (ed.), Agriculture and the Environment. Perspectives in Sustainable Rural Development (pp. 9–21). A World Bank symposium. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICARDA (1998). “Indices of sustainability in a long-term rainfed wheat/legume rotation.” In ICARDA (ed.), Annual Report, 1997 (pp. 39–40). Aleppo, Syria: International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas.

    Google Scholar 

  • INE (Instituto Nacional de Estadística) (1998). Contabilidad regional de España.Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Estadística.

  • JCCM (Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha) (1999). Servicio de estudios y relaciones con la Unión Europea. Toledo: Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha.

  • Lacasta, C. (1995). Investigaciones sobre el secano en Castilla-La Mancha. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laker, J. P. and J. A. Milne (eds.) (1999). Livestock Production in the European Less Favoured Areas. Aberdeen, Scotland: Macaulay Land Use Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichbach, M. I. (1994). “What makes rational peasants revolutionary? Dilemma, paradox, and irony in peasant collective action.” World Politics 46: 383–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2000). Agricultural Policy Reform: Development and Prospects. Policy Brief, June 2000.

  • Olson, M. (1971). The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (2000). Power and Prosperity. Outgrowing Communist and Capitalist Dictatorship. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pala, M. (1997). “Production and improvement of crops for dryland.” In U. S. Gupta (ed.), Book review, Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 115: 15–22.

  • Papastylianou, I. (1999). “Estimation of nitrogen fixed by legumes in long-term vs. short-term cropping systems.” Agronomy Journal91: 329–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarageldin, I. (1999). “Biotechnology and food security in the 21st Century.” Science 285: 387–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A. and R. W. Vishny (1998). The Grabbing Hand. Government Pathologies and Their Cures. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierra, I. (1996). “Los sistemas extensivos, las razas autóctonas y el medio natural.” In SEEP (ed.), Actas de la 36 reunión científica de la SEEP (pp. 17–31). La Rioja, Spain: Sociedad Española para el Estudio de los Pastos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungar, E. D. (1990). Mangement of Agropastoral Systems in a Semirarid Regions. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Pudoc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volanen, R. (1998). “Welcome address.” In S. Gross, E. Bignal and M. Pienkowski (eds.), Agenda 2000 and Prospects for the Environment. European Forum on Nature Conservation and Pastoralism (EFNCP). Occasional Publication No. 16. Argyll, UK: European Forum on Nature Conservation and Pastoralism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weizsäcker, E. U., A. von Lovins, and H. Lovins (1997). Factor Four. Doubling Wealth and Halving Resource Use. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yesilsoy, M. S. and S. Ersahin (1997). “Soil, water and crop management practices in the dryland farming regions of Turkey.” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 12: 130–132.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Agroecology Department, Environmental Science Center, CSIC, Madrid, Spain

    Rafael Caballero

Authors
  1. Rafael Caballero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael Caballero.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caballero, R. Policy schemes and targeted technologies in an extensive cereal–sheep farming system. Agriculture and Human Values 19, 63–74 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015051010634

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015051010634

Search

Navigation