Abstract
Proponents of sustainable agriculture seek deeply rooted social changes, but to advance this agenda requires political credibility and work with diverse partners. Asthe literature on political co-optation makesclear, the tension between conviction andcredibility is persistent and unavoidable; nota problem to be solved so much as a built-incondition of movement politics. Drawing on acase history of California's largestsustainable agriculture organization, astructural assessment is made of the strategicchoices facing movement leaders, organizationaltensions that accompany these choices, andperceived gains and losses. The case historydemonstrates how movement leaders craft middlerange strategies that adapt to politicalcircumstances while retaining attachments tocore values and constituencies. Thesestrategies are ripe with tradeoffs, placingdemands on leaders who must implement them in aspirit that sustains organizational vitalitywhile broadening political and social impact.But they also enlarge the democraticsensibilities of movement leaders, increasingtheir ability to listen, learn, and forgealliances based on shared goals rather thansimilar motives.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boyte, H. C. and N. N. Kari (1996). Building America: The Democratic Promise of Public Work. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Broome, J. and B. Liebhardt (1997). "Agricultural partnerships in California." Sustainable Agriculture 9(3): 1–4.
Buck, D., C. Getz, and J. Guthman (1997). "From farm to table: The organic vegetable commodity chain of northern California." Sociologia Ruralis 37(1): 3–20.
Buttel, F. H. (1992). "Environmentalism: Origins, processes, and implications for rural social change." Rural Sociology 57(1): 1–27.
Buttel, F. H. (1997). "The politics and policies of sustainable agriculture: Some concluding remarks." Society and Natural Resources 10: 341–344.
Dlott, J., T. Nelson, R. Bugg, M. Spezia, R. Eck, J. Redmond, J. Klein, and L. Lewis (1996). "California, USA: Merced County BIOS project." In L. A. Thrupp (ed.), New Partnerships For Sustainable Agriculture. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
Dolbeare, K. M. and M. J. Edelman (1985). American Politics: Policies, Power, and Change. Lexington, Massachusetts: D.C. Heath and Company.
Dye, T. R. and H. Zeigler (1987). The Irony of Democracy: An Uncommon Introduction to American Politics. Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Evans, S. M. and H. C. Boyte (1986). Free Spaces: The Sources of Democratic Change in America. New York: Harper and Row.
Flacks, R. (1981). "Populism in search of the people." Working Papers 8(1): 26–35.
Goldrich, D. and T. Cooper (1984). The Challenge of Internal Development for a Public Interest Coalition. Report to participants in the Northwest Conservation Act Coalition, November 10–11.
Gorz, A. (1967). A Strategy for Labor. Boston: Beacon Press.
Guthman, J. (1998). "Regulating meaning, appropriating nature: the codification of California organic agriculture." Antipode 30(2): 135–154.
Pence, R. A. (1998). Leveling the Learning Fields: An Assessment of the Agriculture Partnership Model of BIOS-Merced and BIFS-Lodi. Evaluation conducted for US EPA, Region IX Agriculture Initiative. Grant #X999–530–111.
Pence, R. A. and J. I. Grieshop (2001). "Mapping the road for voluntary change: Partnerships In agricultural extension." Agriculture and Human Values 18(2): 209–217.
Schaefer, K. S. (ed.) (1997). Learning from the BIOS Approach: A Guide for Community-Based Biological Farming Programs. Davis, California: Community Alliance with Family Farmers; Washington, DC:World Resources Institute.
Sennett, R. (1997). "The new capitalism." Social Research 64(2): 161–180.
Touraine, A. (1988). Return of the Actor: Social Theory in Postindustrial Society. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Wilhoit, L., N. Davidson, D. Supkopf, J. Steggall, A. Braun, S. Simmons, B. Hobza, C. Hunter, N. Gorder, C. Goodman, and B. Todd (1999). Pesticide Use Analysis and Trends from 1991 to 1996. Department of Pesticide Regulation, EMPMBranch, California Department of Food and Agriculture.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Campbell, D. Conviction seeking efficacy: Sustainable agriculture and the politics of co-optation. Agriculture and Human Values 18, 353–363 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015210215751
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015210215751